Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:09:04.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the effect of cannulation of the terminal ileum of the growing pig on the apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids in ground barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. J. Moughan  and
W. C. Smith
P. J. Moughan
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
W. C. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Get access

Extract

Ileal digesta are often sampled from the pig through either re-entrant or simple T-piece cannulas. There is conflicting evidence, however, concerning the effects of cannulation on nutrient digestion and absorption. In several studies with the pig, cannulation has not influenced overall protein digestibility (Furuya, Takahashi and Omori, 1974; Sauer, Stothers and Parker, 1977; Taverner, 1979; Huisman, Weerden, Leeuwen, Hof and Sauer, 1984) or energy metabolism (Close, Heavens, Stephens and Sambrook, 1984) while in other studies (Laplace and Borgida, 1976; Sauer, Aherne and Thacker, 1979) there have been indications of adverse effects of cannulation on nutrient digestibility. Livingstone and McWilliam (1985) showed an effect of simple ileal cannulation on pig growth which may have been due to decreased nutrient digestibility or utilization.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , April 1987 , pp. 319 - 321
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Badawy, A. M. 1964. Changes in the protein and nonprotein nitrogen in the digesta of th e sheep. In The Role of the Gastrointestinal Tract in Protein Metabolism (ed. Munro, H. N.), pp. 175–185. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Badawy, A. M., Campbell, R. M., Cuthbertson, D. P. and Fell, B. F. 1957. Changes in the intestinal mucosa of the sheep following death by humane killer. Nature, London 180: 756–757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Close, W. H., Heavens, R. P., Stephens, D. B. and Sambrook, I. E. 1984. The influence of gastrointestinal cannulation on the energy metabolism of the pig. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 43: 66A (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Fisher, M. T. and Lee, J. 1982. Multi-element analysis by inductively-coupled plasma emission spectrometry in animal diets and faeces containing chromium marker. Analytica Chimica Ada 139: 333–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furuya, S., Takahashi, S. and Omori, S. 1974. The establishment of T-piece cannula fistulas into the small intestine of the pig. Japanese Journal of Zootechnical Science 45: 42–44.Google Scholar
Gargallo, J. and Zimmerman, D. R. 1980. A simple intestinal cannula for swine. American Journal of Veterinary Research 41: 618–619.Google ScholarPubMed
Huisman, J., Weerden, E. J. Van, Leeuwen, P. Van, Hof, G. and Sauer, W. C. 1984. Effect of the insertion of cannulas on rate of passage and nutrient digestibilities in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 59: Suppl. 1, p. 271. (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Laplace, J. P. and Borgida, L. P. 1976. [Physiological problems involved with re-entrant cannulas in the pig ileum: review and experimental studies.] Annales de Zootechnie 25: 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, R. M. and McWilliam, R. 1985. The effect of terminal ileum cannulation on the performance of growing pigs. British Veterinary Journal 141: 186–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sauer, W. C., Aherne, F. X. and Thacker, P. A. 1979. Comparison of amino acid digestibilities in normal and cannulated pigs. In The University of Alberta 58th Annual Feeder's Day Report, pp. 28–29. The University of Alberta Faculty of Extension, Edmonton.Google Scholar
Saljer, W. C., Stothers, S. C. and Parker, R. J. 1977. Apparent and true availabilities of amino acids in wheat and milling by-products for growing pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 57: 775–784.Google Scholar
Taverner, M. R. 1979. Heal availability for pigs of amino acids in cereal grains. Ph.D. Thesis, University of New England, Australia.Google Scholar