Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:25:58.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the differences between geographical areas in the gestation length and birth weight of British Friesian calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

L. K. O'Connor ,
P. D. P. Wood  and
G. F. Smith
L. K. O'Connor
Affiliation:
Milk Marketing Board, Thames Ditton, Surrey
P. D. P. Wood
Affiliation:
Milk Marketing Board, Thames Ditton, Surrey
G. F. Smith
Affiliation:
Milk Marketing Board, Thames Ditton, Surrey
Get access

Extract

The Milk Marketing Board's 23 artificial insemination (AI) centres which provide service in much of England and Wales are grouped into five geographical areas (Figure 1). Analyses of trials on commercial farms to study the effects of crossing Charolais bulls with dairy cows (Edwards et al. 1966), revealed significant differences between these areas in both gestation length and birth weight of crossbred calves. However, the Charolais bulls used in the trials were divided into five teams, each of three bulls, and each team was used only in a single area. Consequently, bull teams and areas were confounded. The purpose of the experiment reported here was to estimate the differences between areas in gestation length and birth weight independent of sire.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , February 1968 , pp. 125 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, H. and Plum, M. 1965. Gestation length and birthweight in cattle and buffaloes: A review. J. Dairy Sci. 48: 1224–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J., Jobst, D., Hodges, J., Leyburn, M., O'Connor, L. K., Macdonald, A., Smith, G. F. and Wood, P. 1966. The Charolais Report, Mlk. Mktg. Bd.Google Scholar
Hodges, J. 1967. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Reading.Google Scholar
O'Connor, L. K. and Willis, M. B. 1967. The effect of artificial insemination on the breed structure of British Friesian Cattle. Anim. Prod. 9: 287–294.Google Scholar
Ridler, B., Broster, W. H. and Foot, A. S. 1963. The growth rate of heifers in a dairy breed. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 61: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, Alan and Asker, A. A. 1951. The genetic history and breed structure of British Friesian Cattle. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 19: 113–130.Google Scholar