Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:13:26.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on teat order and metabolic rate in piglets up to 57 days old

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. B. Meese
Affiliation:
ARC Institute of Animal Physiology, Babraham, Cambridge
Get access

Summary

An investigation was carried out to determine whether teat order has any effect on metabolic rate in young pigs as determined by oxygen consumption in the thermoneutral zone. A total of six sows and their litters was examined. Metabolic rate was determined at 1 day old and thereafter at 7-day intervals up to 57 days of age. Teat order was determined by regular observations of the piglets suckling. There was considerable variation in metabolic rate both within and between litters but there was no detectable effect of teat order on metabolic rate expressed as ml O2/W0·75 per min.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Donald, H. P. 1937a. The milk consumption and growth of suckling pigs. Emp. J. exp.Agric. 5: 349360.Google Scholar
Donald, H. P. 1937b. Suckling and suckling preference in pigs. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 5: 361368.Google Scholar
Fraser, D. and Morley-Jones, R. 1975. The ‘teat order’ of suckling pigs. 1. Relation to birth weight and subsequent growth. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 84: 387391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, J. C. and Thomson, W. 1956. Observations of the behaviour of suckling pigs. Br. J. Anim. Behav. 4: 4651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiber, M. 1961. The Fire of Life. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Mount, L. E. and Stephens, D. B. 1970. The relation between body size and maximum and minimum metabolic rates in the new-born pig. J. Physiol., Lond. 207: 417427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed