Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:43:43.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on porcine skeletal muscle parameters and their possible use in early progeny testing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

N. C. Stickland  and
G. Goldspink
N. C. Stickland
Affiliation:
Muscle Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Hull
G. Goldspink
Affiliation:
Muscle Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Hull
Get access

Summary

An ‘indicator muscle’ (m. flexor digiti V brevis) was removed in its entirety from several Large White and Landrace pigs of varying fat depth (measured over the eye-muscle area). The total muscle fibre number was measured in transverse sections for each muscle. Significant inverse relationships were found between this fibre number and fat depth measurements. These and other results suggest that fibre number is related to lean meat content. Fibre number was also shown to be highly correlated with fibre density and as thinner fibres (i.e. higher fibre density) are associated with more tender meat, fibre number may be associated with quality as well as quantity of meat.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , August 1975 , pp. 93 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carpenter, Z. L., Kauffman, R. G., Bray, R. W., Briskey, E. J. and Weckel, K. G. 1966. Factors influencing quality of pork. A. Histological observations. J. Food Sci. 28: 467–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joubert, D. M. 1956. An analysis of factors influencing post natal growth and development of the muscle fibre. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 47: 59–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingston, D. M. S., Blair, R. and English, P. R. 1966. The usefulness of muscle fibre diameter in studies of the lean meat content of pigs. Anim. Prod. 8: 267–275.Google Scholar
Luff, A. R. and Goldspink, G. 1967. Large and small muscles. Life Sci. 6: 1821–1826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, L. R. 1970. Influences on porcine muscle fibre attributes. Diss. Abstr. 30: No. 4859-B.Google Scholar
Staun, H. 1963. Various factors affecting number and size of muscle fibres in the pig. Ada Agric. scand. XIII: 293–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staun, H. 1968. [Diameter and number of muscle fibres and their relation to meatiness and meat quality in Danish Landrace pigs.] No. 366. Beretn.fra Forsogslab., København.Google Scholar
Stickland, N. C. 1973. The growth and development of skeletal muscle in pigs. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Hull.Google Scholar
Stickland, N. C. and Goldspink, G. 1973. A possible indicator muscle for the fibre content and growth characteristics of porcine muscle. Anim. Prod. 16: 135–146.Google Scholar