Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:14:24.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on milk production in crosses between dutch and American strains of Friesian dairy cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. Soller
Affiliation:
National and University Institute of Agriculture, Rehovoth, Israel
R. Bar-Anan
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Hakirya, Israel
Get access

Extract

In poultry and dairy cattle heterosis is occasionally found in crosses of different strains of the same breed (Hutt and Cole, 1952; Johansson, 1939; Nordskog and Ghostley, 1954). Limited data on the milk production of reciprocal crosses between Dutch and American strains of Friesian dairy cattle being available in Israel, an investigation was carried out to determine whether crossing these two strains resulted in a heterotic effect on milk production.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Goulden, C. H., 1952. Methods of Statistical Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Hutt, F. B. & Cole, R. K., 1952. Heterosis in an interstrain cross of White Leghorns. Poult. Sci., 32: 365.Google Scholar
Johansson, I., 1939. On the results of fusion of the two dairy breeds Swedish Ayrshire and Swedish Pied Cattle. Kungl.Lantbruksakad.Tidskr., 78: 401. Cited in Johansson, I. 1961. Genetic Aspects of Dairy Cattle Breeding. Univ. of Ill. Press, Urbana, Ill.Google Scholar
Nordskog, A. W. & Ghostley, F. J., 1954. Heterosis in poultry. I. Strain crossing and crossbreeding as compared with closed flock breeding. Poult. Sci., 33: 704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A., Stewart, A. & Ashton, E. D., 1956. The progeny assessment of dairy sires for milk; the use of contemporary comparisons. Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. 1956, p. 43.Google Scholar