Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:07:16.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on milk intake of piglets measured by tritium dilution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. S. Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology, Waite Agricultural Research Institute, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia
B. Howard
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology, Waite Agricultural Research Institute, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia
W. V. Macfarlane
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology, Waite Agricultural Research Institute, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia
Get access

Abstract

The milk intake of two litters of suckling piglets was measured by the turnover of tritium-labelled body water. The estimated intakes of a litter of seven piglets agree with the current knowledge of milk yield from sows, which generally rises to a maximum at the 3rd week and then declines. With a litter of four, intake rose continuously from the 1st to the 6th week. Since piglets are often weaned at 3 weeks of age, this method has few disadvantages n i practical use. During the estimation of water turnover the total body water of individual piglets can also be obtained so that information on body composition (solids, protein, fat and ash) can be derived. The efficiency of conversion of milk by piglets can thus be calculated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Buss, D. H. and Voss, W. R. 1971. Evaluation of four methods for estimating the milk yield of baboons. J. Nutr. 101: 901909.Google ScholarPubMed
Dove, H. and Freer, M. 1979. The accuracy of tritiated water turnover rate as an estimate of milk intake in lambs. Aust. J. agric. Res. 30: 725739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, D. L. and Lodge, G. A. 1960. Diet in relation to reproduction and the viability of the young. Part III. Pigs. Tech. Comm. No. 21. Commonw. Bur. Anim. Nutr. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough, Buckinghamshire.Google Scholar
Elsley, F. W. H. 1971. Nutrition and lactation in the sow. In Lactation (ed. Falconer, I. R.), pp. 393411. Proc. Symp. 17th Easter Sch. agric. Sci. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Holleman, D. F., White, R. G. and Luick, J. R. 1975. New isotope methods for estimating milk intake and yield. J. Dairy Sci. 58: 18141821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lfwis, A. J., Speer, V. C. and Haught, D. G. 1978. Relationship between yield and composition of sows' milk and weight gains of nursing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 47: 634638.Google Scholar
Lucas, I. A. M. and Lodge, G. A. 1961. The nutrition of the young pig. Tech. Common. No. 22, Commonw. Bur. Anim. Nutr. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough, Buckinghamshire.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, W. V., Howard, B. and Siebert, B. D. 1969. Tritiated water in the measurement of milk intake and tissue growth of ruminants in the field. Nature, Land. 221: 578579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed