Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:17:37.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on bovine colostrum as an alternative source of immunoglobulin for lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

E. F. Logan ,
W. H. Foster  and
D. Irwin
E. F. Logan
Affiliation:
Veterinary Research Laboratories, Stormont, Belfast, BT4 3SD
W. H. Foster
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down
D. Irwin
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down
Get access

Abstract

Newborn lambs were separated from their dams before they had an opportunity to suck. They were given bovine colostrum in a single feed and thereafter fed on a milk substitute. Their weight gain compared favourably with that of lambs fed on ovine colostrum followed by milk substitute or suckled naturally. It was concluded that bovine colostrum can be used successfully as an alternative source of immunoglobulin for rearing lambs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , February 1978 , pp. 93 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fey, H. Von. 1972. Colibacillosis in Calves. Hans Huber, Bern.Google Scholar
Foster, W. H., McCaughey, W. J., Logan, E. F. and Irwin, D. 1977. Controlled breeding of sheep. 50th Rep. Agric. Res. N. Ireland, pp. 19–27.Google Scholar
Gamble, J. A., Earle, I. P. and Howe, P. E. 1938. Rearing foals and lambs by the use of colostrum, blood serum and substitute milks. Tech. Bull. US Dep. Agric, No. 661.Google Scholar
Halliday, R. 1968. Serum protein concentrations in 2-day-old Finnish Landrace, Scottish Blackface, Merino and Merino × Cheviot lambs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 71: 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, R. 1974. Variations in immunoglobulin concentrations in Merino and Scottish Blackface lambs. Anim. Prod. 19: 301–308.Google Scholar
Kruse, V. 1970. Absorption of immunoglobulin from colostrum in newborn calves. Anim. Prod. 12: 627–638.Google Scholar
Logan, E. F. (1977). The influence of husbandry on colostrum yield and immuno-globulin concentration in beef cows. Br. Vet. J. 133: 120–125.Google Scholar
Logan, E. F. and Irwin, D. 1977. Serum immunoglobulin levels in neonatal lambs. Res. Vet. Sci. 23: 389–390.Google Scholar
Logan, E. F. and Penhale, W. J. 1971. Studies on the immunity of the calf to colibacillosis. IV. The prevention of experimental colisepticaemia by the intravenous administration of a bovine serum IgM-rich fraction. Vet. Rec. 89: 663–667.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1976. Artificial rearing of lambs. Sheep Improvement Service Technical Report. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley, Bucks.Google Scholar
Nedkvitne, J. J. and Haugland, E. 1970. [Artificial rearing of lambs.] Nord.JordbrForskn. 52: 70–71.Google Scholar
Penhale, W. J., Logan, E. F., Selman, I. E., Fisher, E. W. and McEwan, A. D. 1973. Observations on the absorption of colostral immunoglobulins by the neonatal calf and their significance in colibacillosis. Annls Rech. Vet. 4: 223–233.Google Scholar
Penning, P. D., Treacher, T. T. and Woods, A. J. 1971. Intestinal haemorrhage syndrome in artificially-reared lambs. Vet. Rec. 88: 613–615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porter, P. 1972. Immunoglobulins in bovine mammary secretions. Quantitative changes in early lactation and absorption by the neonatal calf. Immunology 23: 225–238.Google ScholarPubMed
Reid, J. F. S. 1972. Serum immune globulin concentrations of newborn hill lambs. Vet. Rec. 90: 371–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spedding, C. R. W., Treacher, T. T. and Penning, P. D. 1970. Feeding systems for the early weaned lamb. Proc. Univ. Nottingham 4th Nutr. Conf. Feed Manufacturers (ed. Swan, H. and Lewis, D.), pp. 70–83. Churchill, London.Google Scholar