Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T07:30:23.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modelling responses to selection for resistance to gastro-intestinal parasites in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

S. C. Bishop
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
M. J. Stear
Affiliation:
Glasgow University Veterinary School, Bearsden Road, Glasgow G61 1QH
Get access

Abstract

This paper describes a general framework which enables responses to selection for resistance to gastro-intestinal parasites in sheep to be stochastically modelled. The model incorporates between-animal variation for pasture intake, the proportion of larvae ingested from the pasture which survive to become adults, the fecundity of the mature worm, along with density-dependent control of this trait and the mortality rate of the worms. The between-animal variation for each component is partitioned into genetic, permanent and temporary environmental components which vary with age. Infection rates are estimated from existing pasture larval contamination and new contamination from infected animals. Using this framework, selection for reduced mean faecal egg count was practised, in silico, for a period of 10 years. Several general patterns emerged. First, a curvilinear response to selection was observed, with responses initially being large then declining over time. Mean faecal egg count declined from approximately 500 to 140 eggs per gin 10 years and worm burdens and pasture larval contamination showed similar patterns of response. The initial responses to selection were approximately 1·7 times that predicted by quantitative genetic theory because the epidemiology of the disease changed as the animals' genetic resistance improved. A method of partitioning selection responses into components due to the altered genotypes of the animals and components due to altered disease epidemiology is outlined. Secondly, the faecal egg count distribution became more aggregated, or skewed, as selection progressed. Thirdly, correlating pasture contamination levels across years (carry-over effects) resulted in even greater apparent responses to selection. Finally, regular anihelmintic treatment reduced mean faecal egg counts but did not alter the patterns of response to selection, indicating that selective breeding should be feasible under a variety of anthelmintic regimes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. M. and May, R. M. 1992. Infectious diseases of humans. Dynamics and control. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, R. L., Watson, T. G., Bisset, S. A., Vlassof, A. and Douch, P. G. C. 1991. Breeding sheep in New Zealand for resistance to internal parasites: research results and commercial application. In Breeding for disease resistance sheep (ed. Gray, G. D. and Woolaston, R. R.), pp. 1932. Australian Wool Corporation, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Barger, I. A. 1989. Genetic resistance of hosts and its influence on epidemiology. Veterinary Parasitology 32: 2135CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, E. H. and Dobson, R. J. 1990. Population dynamics of trichostrongylus colubriformis in sheep: computer model simulate grazing systems and the evolution of anthelmintic resistance. International Journalfor Parasitology 20: 823831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beecham, J. A., Wright, I. A. and Gettinby, G. 1994. An integrated model of helminth epidemiology in ryegrass pastures grazed by sheep. Proceedings of the 45th meeting the European Association of Animal Production, paper SI. 5.Google Scholar
Bishop, S. C., Bairden, K., McKellar, Q. A., Park, M. and Stear, M. J. 1996. Genetic parameters for faecal egg count following mixed, natural, predominantly Ostertagia circumcincta infection and relationships with live weight in young lambs. Animal Science 63: 423428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gettinby, G. and Byrom, W. 1991. Weather-based computer experiments on parasites. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 11: 293308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gettinby, G., Soutar, A., Armour, J. and Evans, P. 1989. Anthelmintic resistance and the control of ovine ostergiasis: a drug action model for genetic selection. International Journal for Parasitology 19: 369376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1983. GENSTAT a general statistical program. Numerical Algorithms Group Limited.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. G. and Grenfell, B. T. 1991. The population dynamics of nematode infections of ruminants: periodic perturbations as a model for management. IMA Journal of Mathematics Applied in Medicine and Biology 8: 8393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. and Guerrero, J. 1993. Mathematical models for the population biology of Ostertagia ostertagi and the significance of aggregated parasite distributions. Veterinary Parasitology 46: 243257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stear, M. J., Bairden, K., Duncan, J. L., Gettinby, G., McKellar, Q. A., Murray, M. and Wallace, D. S. 1995a. The distribution of faecal nematode egg counts in Scottish Blackface lambs following natural, predominantly Ostertagia circumcincta infection. Parasitology 110: 573581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stear, M. J., Bishop, S. C., Doligalska, M., Duncan, J. L., Holmes, P. H., Irvine, J., McCririe, L., McKellar, Q. A., Sinski, E. and Murray, M. 1995b. Regulation of egg production, worm burden, worm length and worm fecundity by host responses in sheep infected with Ostertagia circumcincta. Parasite Immunology 17: 643652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stear, M. J., Bishop, S. C., Duncan, J. L., McKellar, Q. A. and Murray, M. 1995c. The repeatability of faecal egg counts, peripheral eosinophil counts, and plasma pepsinogen concentrations during deliberate infections with Ostertagia circumcincta. International Journal for Parasitology 25: 375380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Windon, R. G. 1990. Selective breeding for the control of nematodiasis in sheep. Revue Scientifique et Technique, Office International des Epizootics 9: 555576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolaston, R. R. and Piper, L. R. 1996. Selection of Merino sheep for resistance to Haemonchus contortus: genetic variation. Animal Science 62: 451460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolaston, R. R., Windon, R. G. and Gray, G. D. 1991. Genetic variation in resistance to internal parasites in Armidale experimental flocks. In Breeding for disease resistance in sheep (ed. Gray, G. D. and Woolaston, R. R.), pp. 19. Australian Wool Corporation, Melbourne.Google Scholar