Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:31:16.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Milk production from silage 3. A comparison of red clover with grass silage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. Thomas ,
K. Aston  and
S. R. Daley
C. Thomas
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
K. Aston
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
S. R. Daley
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
Get access

Abstract

Silages were made from the primary growth of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) or red clover (Trifolium pratense) and were given ad libitum to 52 British Friesian cows, together with 70 kg dry matter per day of a barley/ground maize/soya bean supplement in 2 years. Twenty of the cows were used in both years, providing a total of 72 observations. Three treatments were imposed during weeks 3 t o 20 of lactation: red clover silage, (RC/RC); red clover silage, weeks 3 to 10, grass silage weeks 12 to 20 (RC/PRG); grass silage (PRG/PRG).

Apparent digestibility of the gross energy assessed in lactation weeks 14 and 15 was slightly lower for red clover than for perennial ryegrass (0·683, 0·706 and 0·701 for treatments RC/RC, RC/PRG and PRG/PRG respectively). There was no effect of previous treatment on the digestibility of perennial ryegrass diets (RC/PRG v. PRG/PRG). Cows given red clover silage consumed proportionately 1·22 of the dry matter and 1·09 of the digestible energy ingested by those given perennial ryegrass. The intake of perennial ryegrass in mid lactation was similar, irrespective of early lactation treatment.

During weeks 3 to 20, cows given red clover yielded 1·9 kg more milk than did those given perennial ryegrass (P < 0·01). However, this milk had a significantly lower concentration of fat (P < 0·01; 37·2 and 41·2 g/kg for treatment RC/RC and PRG/PRG respectively). In mid lactation the cows that had received red clover silage in early lactation (RC/PRG) had the lowest yield of milk, milk fat, protein and lactose and the difference between this treatment and PRG/PRG was significant for milk and milk fat yields (P < 0·05).

Red clover silage rather than perennial ryegrass silage of similar digestibility resulted in higher silage intake and higher yields of milk, milk protein and lactose. However, the strategic use of red clover silage to increase yield in early lactation did not induce positive residual effects in mid lactation; rather, there was evidence of a negative effect on milk and milk-fat yield.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , August 1985 , pp. 23 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Apoar, W. P., Ramage, C. H. and Mather, R. E. 1966. Nitrogen fertilized orchardgrass compared with alfalfa at different levels of concentrate feeding for dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 49: 1033–1037.Google Scholar
Austin, A. R., Aston, K., Drane, Hilary M. and Saba, N. 1982. The fertility of heifers consuming red clover silage. Grass Forage Sci. 37: 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beever, D. E., Losada, H. R., Cammell, S. B., Evans, R. T. and Haines, M. J. 1985. Effect of forage species and season on nutrient digestion and supply in grazing cattle. Br. J. Nutr. In press.Google Scholar
Blair, T., Thomas, C., Thompson, W. F., Golightly, A. J. and Marshall, D. R. 1981. The effect of level of concentrate supplementation on silage intake and milk yield of autumn-calving heifers and cows. Grass Forage Sci. 36: 127–129.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. and Broster, V. J. 1984. Review s of the progress of dairy science. Long-term effects of plane of nutrition on the performance of the dairy cow. J. Dairy Res. 51: 149–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broster, W. H. and Thomas, C. 1981. The influence of level and pattern of concentrate input on milk output. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition – 1981 (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 49–69. Butterworth, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, M. E. and Watson, J. N. 1974. Red clover silage for milk production. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 29: 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, C. J., Corrall, A. J., Thomas, C., Le Du, Y. L. P. and Morrison, J. 1983. The integration of conservation with grazing for milk production: a computer simulation of the practical and economic implication. Grass Forage Sci. 38: 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frame, J. 1976. The potential of tetraploid red clover and its role in the United Kingdom. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 31: 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1976. Effects of concentrate level and stocking rat e on performance of dairy cows calving in late winter. Anim. Prod. 22: 175–187.Google Scholar
Green, J. O., Corrall, A. J. and Terry, R. A. 1971. Grass species and varieties. Relationships between stage of growth, yield and forage quality. Tech. Rep. Grassld Res. Inst. No. 8.Google Scholar
Hunt, I. V., Frame, J. and Harkess, R. D. 1975. Potential productivity of red clover varieties in S.W. Scotland. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 30: 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. L. 1983. The effect of level and pattern of feeding on the yield of milk constituents from cows of different yield potential. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 101: 717–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, Heather D. St C., Thomas, C. and Cobby, J. M. 1984. Comparison of equations for predicting voluntary intake by dairy cows. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 103: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, J. E. and Betts, J. E. 1968. Seasonal oestrogenic activity of various legumes. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 70: 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osbourn, D. F., Cammell, S. B., Terry, R. A. and Outen, G. E. 1975. Forage composition and the conduct of digestion trials for the comparative evaluation of laboratory procedures. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 30: 101–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osbourn, D. F., Terry, R. A., Outen, G. E. and Cammell, S. B. 1975. The significance of a determination of cell walls as the rational basis for the nutritive evaluation of forages. Proc. 12th int. Grassld Congr., Moscow, pp. 514–519.Google Scholar
Pope, G. S., McNaughton, M. J. and Jones, H. E. H. 1959. Oestrogens in British pasture plants. J. Dairy Res. 25: 196–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, G. L., Porter, R. H. D. and Robinson, I. 1979. Comparison of perennial ryegrass and white clover for milk production. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. Occ. Publ. No. 8. 1982 (ed. MacMillan, K. L. and Taufa, V. K.), pp. 213–214.Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Aston, K., Tayler, J. C., Daley, S. R. and Osbourn, D. F. 1981a. Milk production from silage. 1. The influence of an additive containing formaldehyde and formic acid on the response of lactating heifers and cows to supplementary protein. Anim. Prod. 32: 285–295.Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Daley, S. R., Aston, K. and Hughes, P. M. 1981b. Milk production from silage. 2. The influence of the digestibility of silage made from the primary growth of perennial ryegrass. Anim. Prod. 33: 7–13.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. J. 1975. The effect of feeding red clover conserved by drying or ensiling on reproduction in the ewe. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 30: 149–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, D. J. 1977. The role of legumes in improving the quality of forage diets. Proc. int. Meet. Anim. Prod. Temperate Grassld (ed. Gilsenen, B.), pp. 131–135. An Foras Táluntais, Dublin.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E., Haines, M. J., Cammell, S. B., Evans, R. T., Dhanoa, M. S. and Austin, A. R. 1985. The yield and composition of the milk from Friesian cows grazing either perennial ryegrass or white clover in early lactation. J. Dairy Res. 52: 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar