Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T01:33:28.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Milk production from grass silage diets: strategies for concentrate allocation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

K. Aston ,
J. D. Sutton  and
W. J. Fisher
K. Aston
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
J. D. Sutton
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
W. J. Fisher
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
Get access

Abstract

To investigate strategies for concentrate allocation, 155 multiparous Holstein-Friesian cows received grass silage ad libitum during lactation weeks 4 to 22 in two experiments. A standard concentrate (196 g crude protein (CP) per kg dry matter (DM)) was offered at the same average amount across the lactation period either at aflat rate or as two rates with a change of 6 kg in week 13. Treatments, described as kg concentrate DM per day in the first and second periods of lactation, were 3: 3, 6: 0, 3: 9 (experiment 1), 6: 6, 9: 3, 9: 9 and 12: 6 (experiments 1 and 2). In experiment 2, two additional treatments maintained CP supply from concentrate after a change from 9 and 12 kg DM by giving 3 and 6 kg high-protein concentrate (HP) DM per day (575 and 383 g CP per kg respectively).

Generally as concentrate intake increased silage intake fell, DM intake rose and yields of milk and all milk solids increased linearly. However, in experiment 1 from a base of 3 kg DM, as concentrate intake increased so did fat yield overall and protein yield in mid-lactation but at a declining rate. Fat concentration was depressed at the lowest and highest concentrate levels. Protein concentration rose as concentrate allowance increased particularly at low levels. Increasing concentrate in mid lactation improved protein but not fat concentration. Additional concentrate either spared weight loss or increased weight gain. Distributing more of a fixed allowance of concentrate to early lactation did not affect cow performance overall.

Silage intake, milk, protein and lactose yields and protein concentration increased and fat concentration was reduced by giving HP concentrates, effects being greater with 3 than with 6 kg DM per day. Reducing concentrate level while maintaining CP intake did not influence milk and solids yields. The ratios of responses to concentrate CP (3 kg DM per day HP v. 3 kg DM per day standard) compared with concentrate energy (9 kg DM per day standard v. 3 kg DM per day HP) were 2·1, 2·2, 7·4 and 1·9 for milk, fat, protein and lactose yields respectively. The results suggest feeding strategies for manipulating the production and quality of milk from grass silage diets.

Keywords

concentratesdairy cowsmilk productionproteinsilage
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 61 , Issue 3 , December 1995 , pp. 465 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1992. Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients, report No. 9. Nutritive requirements of ruminant animals: protein. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews. Series B 62: 787–835.Google Scholar
Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1993. Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Aston, K., Thomas, C, Daley, S. R. and Sutton, J. D. 1994a. Milk production from grass silage diets: effects of the composition of supplementary concentrates. Animal Production 59: 335–344.Google Scholar
Aston, K., Thomas, C, Daley, S. R., Sutton, J. D. and Dhanoa, M. S. 1994b. Milk production from grass silage diets: effects of silage characteristics and the amount of supplementary concentrate. Animal Production 59: 31–41.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Broster, V. J. and Smith, T. 1969. Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer. VII. Effect on milk production of level of feeding at two stages of the lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72: 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, W. H. and Thomas, C. 1981. The influence of level and pattern of concentrate input on milk output. In Recent advances in animal mutrition — 1981 (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 49–69. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Cammell, S. B., Beever, D. E., Sutton, J. D., Spooner, M. C. and Haines, M. J. 1992. Body composition and performance of autumn-calving Holstein-Friesian dairy cows during lactation: energy partition. Animal Production 54: 475 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Castle, M. E. 1982. Feeding high quality silage. In Silage for milk production (ed. Rook, J. A. F. and Thomas, P. C.), technical bulletin, National Institute for Research in Dairying, Reading and Hannah Research Institute, Ayr, no. 2, pp. 127–150.Google Scholar
Ekern, A. 1992. Feeding of high yielding dairy cows. Technical bulletin no. 147. Department of Animal Nutrition, Agricultural University of Norway.Google Scholar
Emery, R. S. 1978. Feeding for increased milk protein. Journal of Dairy Science 61: 825–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferns, H. R. and Roberts, D. J. 1984. The diagnosis of the causes of the production of herd milk with low fat, protein and lactose contents. In Milk compositional quality and its importance in future markets (ed. Castle, M. E. and Gunn, R. G.), occasional publication, British Society of Animal Production, no. 9, pp. 53–67.Google Scholar
Gleeson, P. A. 1970. Feeding dairy concentrates to maximum advantage under Irish conditions. In Dairy nutrition, pp. 85–95. U. S. Feed Grains Council, London.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1984. The effect of level of concentrate supplementation given with grass silage during the winter on the total lactation performance of autumn-calving dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102: 163–179.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. and McMurray, C. H. 1979. The optimum level of protein in the supplement for dairy cows with access to grass silage. Animal Production 29: 283–291.Google Scholar
Laird, R., Leaver, J. D., Moisey, F. R. and Castle, M. E. 1981. The effects of concentrate supplements on the performance of dairy cows offered grass silage ad libitum. Animal Production 33: 199–209.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. 1981. Proceedings of the sixth silage conference (ed. Harkness, R. D. and Castle, M. E.). University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Technical bulletin, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, no. 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Moisey, F. R. and Leaver, J. D. 1985. Systems of concentrate allocation for dairy cows. 3. A comparison of two flat-rate feeding systems at two amounts of concentrates. Animal Production 40: 209–217.Google Scholar
Østergaard, V. 1979. Strategies for concentrate feeding to attain optimum feeding level in high yielding dairy cows. Beretningfra Statens Husdyrbrugs forsoq, Kobenhavn, no. 482.Google Scholar
Rook, A. J., Gill, M., Willink, R. D. and Lister, S. J. 1991. Prediction of voluntary intake of grass silages by lactating cows offered concentrates at a flat rate. Animal Production 52: 407–420.Google Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. and Line, C. 1961. The effect of the plane of energy nutrition of the cow on the secretion in milk of the constituents of the solids-not-fat fraction and on the concentration of certain blood-plasma constituents. British Journal of Nutrition 15: 109–119.Google Scholar
Spörndly, E. 1989a. Effects of diet on milk composition and yield of dairy cows with special emphasis on milk protein content. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 19: 99–106.Google Scholar
Spörndly, E. 1989b. Effects on milk protein content, yield and composition of dietary changes in diets based on grass silage to dairy cows. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 19: 107–113.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Aston, K., Beever, D. E. and Fisher, W. J. 1994. Milk production from grass silage diets: the relative importance of the amounts of energy and crude protein in the concentrates. Animal Production 59: 327–334.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D. and Morant, S. V. 1989. A review of the potential of nutrition to modify milk fat and protein. Livestock Production Science 23: 219–237.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. and Leaver, J. D. 1984. Systems of concentrate allocation for dairy cattle. 2. A comparison of two patterns of allocation for autumn-calving cows offered two qualities of grass silage ad libitum. Animal Production 39: 325–333.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. and Leaver, J. D. 1986. Systems of concentrate allocation for dairy cattle. 4. A comparison of two amounts and two patterns of allocation. Animal Production 43: 17–26.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. 1980. Conserved forages. In Feeding strategies for dairy cows (ed. Broster, W. H., Johnson, C. L. and Tayler, J. C.), pp. 8.1–8.14. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. 1987. Factors affecting substitution rates in dairy cows on silage-based rations. In Recent advances in animal nutrition — 1987 (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 205–218. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, C, Aston, K., Daley, S. R. and Bass, J. 1986. Milk production from silage. 4. The effect of the composition of the supplement. Animal Production 42: 315–325.Google Scholar