Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:08:50.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Milk acetone concentration as an indicator of hyperketonaemia in dairy cows: the critical value revised

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. H. Gustafsson
Affiliation:
Swedish Association for Livestock Breeding and Production, Research and Development, S-631 84 Eskilstuna, Sweden
U. Emanuelson
Affiliation:
Swedish Association for Livestock Breeding and Production, Research and Development, S-631 84 Eskilstuna, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Acetone concentration in milk is correlated with subclinical and clinical ketosis and also with milk yield and reproductive efficiency. The purpose of this study was to assess a threshold of milk acetone at which cows tend to be adversely affected. The critical values were estimated on data from 11690 lactations where the change in daily milk yield from weeks 1 to 2 to weeks 5 to 6 of lactation was evaluated in relation to different milk acetone concentrations. Daily milk yield tended to be reduced in cows with acetone concentrations between 0·7 and 1·4 mmol/l, but responses were not entirely consistent. At concentrations >l·4 mmol/l, daily milk yield was clearly reduced. Long-term milk yield (day 0 to 100 and day 0 to 200) was about 190 kg of 40 g/kg fat-corrected milk (FCM) less in cows with acetone concentrations >l·4 vis-à-vis <0·7 mmol/l. Reproductive efficiency was also impaired in cows with acetone concentrations >l·4 mmol/l; 4·9 days longer interval from calving to first service (first parity and parity 2+ cows) and 5·7 times a greater risk of cystic ovaries (parity 1), compared with cows with milk acetone <0·7 mmol/l. However, no significant effects on long-term milk yield or on reproductive efficiency were found in cows with acetone concentrations 0·7 to 1·4 vis-à-vis <0·7 mmol/l. The results suggest that 1·4 mmol/l acetone in milk may be used as the most important critical value, as higher concentrations are detrimental to productivity. The interval 0·7 to 1·4 mmol acetone per I milk may be used as a warning class, since early lactation yield may be reduced.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersson, L. and Emanuelson, U. 1985. An epidemiological study of hyperketonaemia in Swedish dairy cows; determinants and the relation to fertility. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 3: 449462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, L., Gustafsson, A. H. and Emanuelson, U. 1991. Effect of hyperketonaemia and feeding on fertility in dairy cows. Theriogenology 36: 521536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersson, L. and Lundstrom, K. 1984. Milk and blood ketone bodies, blood isopropanol and plasma glucose in dairy cows; methodological studies and diurnal variations. Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin A 31: 340349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canfield, R. W. and Butler, W. R. 1990. Energy balance and pulsatile LH-secretion in early postpartum dairy cattle. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 7: 323330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gustafsson, A. H. 1993. Acetone and urea concentration in milk as indicators of the nutritional status and the composition of the diet of dairy cows. Dissertation. Report 222, Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, A. H., Andersson, L. and Emanuelson, U. 1993. Effect of hyperketonaemia, feeding frequency and intake of concentrate and energy on milk yield in dairy cows. Animal Production 56: 5160.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1977. User's guide for LSML76. Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.Google Scholar
Kesler, D. J. and Garverick, H. A. 1982. Ovarian cysts in dairy cattle: a review. Journal of Animal Science 55: 11471159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lameshow, S. and Hosmer, D. W. 1984. Estimating odds ratios with categorically scaled covariates in multiple logistic regression analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology 119: 147151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, M. C., Savio, J. D., Badinga, L., De La Sota, R. L. and Thatcher, W. W. 1992a. Factors that affect ovarian follicular dynamics in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 70: 36153626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucy, M. C., Staples, C. R., Thatcher, W. W., Erickson, P. S., Cleale, R. M., Firkins, J. L., Clark, J. H., Murphy, M. R. and Brodie, B. O. 1992b. Influence of diet composition, dry-matter intake, milk production and energy balance on time of post-partum ovulation and fertility in dairy cows. Animal Production 54: 323331.Google Scholar
Marstorp, P., Anfalt, T. and Andersson, L. 1983. Determination of oxidized ketone bodies in milk by flow injection analysis. Analytical Chimica Acta 149: 281289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miettinen, P. v. A. 1994. Relationship between milk acetone and milk yield in individual cows. Journal of Veterinary Medicine A 41: 102109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1985. SAS user's guide: statistics, version 5 edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar