Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:04:55.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Meat tenderness and palatability of Swamp buffalo and four breeds of cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. D. Charles
D. D. Charles
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4067, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Samples of cooked muscle of Swamp buffalo, Hereford, Angus, Friesian and Charolais cross steers were sheared and scored by a taste panel for tenderness, flavour, juiciness and palatability. The cattle were given commercial pellets from 9 months of age to slaughter at 12,15 and 18 months. The buffaloes were fed one of four regimens: all pellets, all hay, 3/4 pellets and 1/4 hay or 1/4 pellets and 3/4 hay from 13 to 22 months of age to slaughter at 20 to 34 months.

There was little difference between the buffaloes and the cattle in shear-force or taste panel scores. Age at slaughter had no significant effect on the quality traits measured in either the buffaloes or the cattle. The feeding regime did not influence the tenderness, flavour or palatability of buffalo muscle but the high pellet diets increased juiciness.

Shear-force was not influenced by rectal or muscle temperatures, muscle pH, carcass weight or fatness in the buffaloes but fatness reduced shear-force in cattle m. longissimus.

Buffalo intramuscular fat increased with age and carcass fatness but had no effect on shear-force or taste panel score.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , February 1982 , pp. 79 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Butterfield, R. M. 1963. Estimation of carcase composition: the anatomical approach. Symp. Carcase Composition Appraisal Meat Anims (Tribe, D. E.), Pap. No. 4, p. 1. CSIRO, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Charles, D. D. and Johnson, E. R. 1975. Liveweight gains and carcass composition of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) steers on four feeding regimes. Aust. J. agric. Res. 26: 407–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Covington, R. C., Tuma, H. J., Grant, D. L. and Dayton, A. D. 1970. Various chemical and histological characteristics of beef muscle as related to tenderness. J. Anim. Sci. 30: 191–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuff, H. C. 1972. Observations of scrub cattle and feral buffaloes in the sub-coastal plains of the Northern Territory. A Collection of Papers Related to the Northern Territory Buffalo Industry, 9th Bienn. Conf. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod., pp. 52–56.Google Scholar
Da vies, H. L. 1977. Continued studies on the effect of grain or pasture on the carcass composition and meat quality of Friesian steers. Aust. J. agric. Res. 28: 755–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, R. A., Nelms, G. E. and Schoonover, C. O. 1966. Effects of age, marbling and sex on palatability of beef. J. Anim. Sci. 25: 360–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goll, D. E., Carlin, A. F., Anderson, L. P., Kline, E. A. and Walter, M. J. 1965. Effect of marbling on maturity of beef muscle characteristics. II. Physical, chemical and sensory evaluation of steaks. Fd Technol., Champaign 19: 845–849.Google Scholar
Hiner, R. L. and Hankins, O. G. 1950. The tenderness of beef in relation to different muscles and age in the animal. J. Anim. Sci. 9: 347–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunsley, R. E., Vetter, R. L., Kline, E. A. and Burroughs, W. 1971. Effects of age and sex on quality, tenderness and collagen content of bovine longissimus muscle. J. Anim. Sci. 33: 933–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E. R. and Charles, D. D. 1975. Comparisons of liveweight gain and changes in carcass composition between buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) and Bos taurus steers. Aust. J. agric. Res. 26: 415–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joksimovic, J. 1969. Physical, chemical and structural characteristics of buffalo meat. Arh. poljopr. Nauke Teh. 22: 110–151.Google Scholar
Joksimovic, J. and Ognjanovic, A. 1977. Comparison of carcase yield, carcase composition and quality characteristics of buffalo meat and beef. Meat Sci. 1: 105–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kartha, K. P. R. 1959. Buffalo. In An Introduction to Animal Husbandry in the Tropics, 1st ed. (ed. Williamson, G. and Payne, W. J. A.), pp. 247–262. Longmans, Green, London.Google Scholar
King, G. T., Butler, O. D. and Simms, R. L. 1958. Beef acceptability as rated by a panel of families and the WarnerBratzler Shear, using loin steaks and chuck roasts from cattle of known history. J. Anim. Sci. 17: 1152 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Letts, G. A. 1962. Early livestock introduction to the ‘top-end’ of the Northern Territory. Aust. vet. J. 38: 282–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, B., Thomas, J., Buckley, R. and Cole, J. W. 1960. The quality of grain finished and grass finished beef as affected by ripening. Fd Technol., Champaign 14: 4–7.Google Scholar
Ragab, M. T., Darwish, M. Y. H., Shafie, M. M. and Malek, A. G. A. 1966. Meat production from Egyptian buffaloes. III. — Tenderness in buffalo's meat as influenced by age. J. Anim. Prod. U.A.R. 6: 51–62.Google Scholar
Smith, G. C., Dutson, T. R., Hostetler, R. L. and Carpenter, Z. L. 1976. Fatness, rate of chilling and tenderness of lamb. J. Fd Sci. 41: 748–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuma, H. J., Henrickson, R. L., Stephens, D. F. and Moore, Ruby. 1962. Influence of marbling and animal age on factors associated with beef quality. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 848–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar