Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:14:54.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mating behaviour in a small flock of lowland sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. Tomkins  and
M. J. Bryant
T. Tomkins
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Department of Agriculture, Earley Gate, Reading, RG6 2AT
M. J. Bryant
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Department of Agriculture, Earley Gate, Reading, RG6 2AT
Get access

Summary

A flock of Polled Dorset Horn ewes joined with three Polled Dorset Horn rams were observed during the hours of daylight, for 17 days, when all the ewes were known to be showing oestrus regularly. The number of approaches, mounts and serves made by the rams and the identities of the ewes involved were recorded.

The mean and SE for the number of services per ewe in oestrus was 4·2 ± 0·3. There were no significant differences in sexual performance between the rams apart from the number of mounts and the mount to service ratio. The number of ewes served per ram and the number of services per ewe in oestrus declined significantly over the 17-day period. Ram performance was significantly related to the number of ewes in oestrus and to the time that the rams had been joined with the same group of stimulative animals (e.g. multiple regression of number of services x with time y and number of ewes in oestrus z is: x = −0·72y + 1·3z + 8·8).

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , October 1972 , pp. 203 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Banks, E. M. 1964. Some aspects of sexual behaviour in domestic sheep, Ovis aries. Behaviour 23: 249–279.Google Scholar
Bermant, G., Clegg, M. T. and Beamer, W. 1969. Copulatory behaviour of the ram, Ovis aries. I. A normative study. Anim. Behav. 17: 700–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blockey, M. A. De B. and Cumming, I. A. 1970. Mating behaviour of Merino ewes. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 8: 344–345.Google Scholar
Bourke, M. E. 1967. A study of mating behaviour of Merino rams. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 7: 203–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connors, R. W. and Giles, J. R. 1970. An association between ram fertility and repro- ductive performance of Merino ewes of different ages. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 8: 331–336.Google Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E. 1969. The Behaviour of Domestic Animals, 2nd ed. Ballière, Tindall and Cassell Ltd, London.Google Scholar
Hulet, C. V. 1966. Behavioural, social and psychological factors affecting mating time and breeding efficiency in sheep. Environmental Influences on Reproductive Processes. 7th Biennial Symposium on Animal Reproduction, 1965. J. Anim. Sci. 25 (suppl.): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulet, C. V., Ercanbrack, S. K., Price, D. A., Blackwell, R. L. and Wilson, L. O. 1962a. Mating behaviour of the ram in the one-sire pen. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 857–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulet, C. V., Ercanbrack, S. K., Price, D. A., Blackwell, R. L. and Wilson, L. O. 1962b. Mating behaviour of the ram in the multi-sire pen. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 865–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulet, C. V., Ercanbrack, S. K., Price, D. A., Blackwell, R. L. and Wilson, L. O. 1962c. Mating behaviour of the ewe. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 870–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambourne, L. J. 1956. Mating behaviour. Proc. Ruakura Farmers' Conference Week, Hamilton, New Zealand, 1956, p. 16.Google Scholar
Lees, J. L. and Weatherhead, M. 1970. A note on mating preferences of Clun Forest ewes. Anim. Prod. 12: 173–175.Google Scholar
Lindsay, D. R. 1965. Modification of behavioural oestrus in the ewe by social and hormonal factors. Anim. Behav. 14: 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, D. R. and Ellsmore, J. 1968. The effect of breed, season and competition on mating behaviour of rams. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 8: 649–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, D. R. and Robinson, T. J. 1961a. Studies on the efficiency of mating in sheep. I. The effect of paddock size and number of rams. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 57: 137–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, D. R. and Robinson, T. J. 1961b. Studies on the efficiency of mating in sheep. II. The effect of freedom of the rams, paddock size and age of the ewes. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 57: 141–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, F. F. and Terrill, C. E. 1937. Estrus, ovulation and related phenomena in the ewe. Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Stn, No. 264.Google Scholar
McMeniman, N. P. and Beasley, P. S. 1970. The influence of previous experience upon mating behaviour of maiden ewes. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 8: 371–374.Google Scholar
Mattner, P. E., Braden, A. H. W. and Turnbull, K. E. 1967. Studies in flock mating of sheep. I. Mating behaviour. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 7: 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepelko, W. E. and Clegg, M. T. 1965. Influence of season of the year upon patterns of sexual behaviour in male sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 24: 633–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar