Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:20:26.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mammogenesis and first lactation milk yields of identical-twin heifers following pre-pubertal administration of bovine growth hormone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

L. D. Sandles ,
C. J. Peel  and
P. D. Temple-Smith
L. D. Sandles
Affiliation:
Ellinbank Dairy Research Institute, Warragul 3820, Australia
C. J. Peel
Affiliation:
Ellinbank Dairy Research Institute, Warragul 3820, Australia
P. D. Temple-Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, Monash University, Clayton 3168, Australia
Get access

Abstract

The effects of long-term administration of bovine growth hormone (GH) on pre-pubertal mammogenesis and subsequent milk production were examined in pasture-fed dairy heifers. Purified bovine GH (specific activity 0·78 i.u. per mg) was administered daily for 21 weeks (0·6 mg GH per kg M 0·75) to one member of each of 12 sets of twins from 3·5 (range 2·5 to 4-5) months of age. GH administration resulted in a significantly smaller mammary gland compared with control heifers at slaughter at the end of treatment (717 v. 839 g; P < 005 (no. = 4)) and increased the proportion of mammary fat pad containing parenchyma (461 v. 383 g/kg; P < 0·01). Mammary parenchymal dry, fat-free tissue was increased in the GH-treated group (25·8 v. 22·5 g; P < 0·05), and fat-pad adipose tissue was reduced (323 v. 435 g; P < 005), compared with the control group. Morphometric analysis of the mammary gland revealed an increase in the volume fraction of connective tissue (P < 0·1) and a tendency toward less fat in GH-treated heifers compared with control heifers. Estimates of the composition of the whole gland confirmed that GH treatment reduced total mammary fat (372 v. 496 g; P < 0·05). At calving, udder volume was greater in the heifers treated with GH compared with the untreated group (14·8 v. 11·2 1; P < 0·05 (no. = 4)). However, there were no differences in the mean daily yields of milk or milk components between groups.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , December 1987 , pp. 349 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, R. R. 1975. Mammary gland growth in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 41: 118–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauman, D. E., Eppard, P. J., Degeeter, M. J. and Lanza, G. M. 1985. Responses of high producing dairy cows to long-term treatment with pituitary and recombinant-growth hormone. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 1352–1362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, A. T., Tindal, J. S. and Yokoyama, A. 1966. The induction of mammary growth in the hypophysectomized goat. Journal of Endocrinology 34: 185–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, S. R., Hughson, G. A. and Bryant, A. M. 1983. Differences in the extent of mammary development between Jersey cows of high or low genetic merit. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 43: 71–72.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. D., Reynolds, I. P. and Little, W. 1983. A quantitative analysis of mammary glands of dairy heifers reared at different rates of live-weight gain. Journal of Dairy Research 50: 405–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herington, A. C., Jacobs, L. S. and Daughaday, W. H. 1974. Radioreceptor and radioimmunoassay quantitation of human growth hormone in acromegalic serum: overestimation by immunoassay and systematic differences between antisera. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 39: 256–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnsson, I. D., Hart, I. C. and Turvey, A. 1986. Pre-pubertal mammogenesis in the sheep. 3. The effects of restricted feeding or daily administration of bovine growth hormone and bromocriptine on mammary growth and morphology. Animal Production 42: 53–63.Google Scholar
Little, W. and Kay, R. M. 1979. The effects of rapid rearing and early calving on the subsequent performance of dairy heifers. Animal Production 29: 131–142.Google Scholar
Lyons, W. R. 1958. Hormonal synergism in mammary growth. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 149: 303–325.Google ScholarPubMed
Martin, R. F., Donohue, D. C. and Finch, L. R. 1972. New analytical procedure for the estimation of DNA with p-nitrophenylhydrazine. Biochemistry 47: 562–574.Google ScholarPubMed
Martin, R. F. and Hodgson, G. S. 1973. Estimation of DNA, RNA and125I- and 3H-labelled DNA in the same sample. Analytical Biochemistry 52: 462–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, L. A., Wien, S., Duquette, P. F., Rickes, E. L. and Cordes, E. H. 1983. Effects of exogenous growth hormone and diethylstilbestrol on growth and carcass composition of growing lambs. Journal of Animal Science 56: 1315–1323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peel, C. J., Bauman, D. E., Gorewit, R. C. and Snifff, N. C. J. 1981. Effect of exogenous growth hormone on lactational performance in high yielding dairy cows. Journal of Nutrition 111: 1662–1671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peel, C. J., Fronk, T. J., Bauman, D. E. and Gorewit, R. C. 1983. Effects of exogenous growth hormone in early and late lactation on lactational performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 66: 776–782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peel, C. J., Sandles, L. D., Quelch, K. J. and Herington, A. C. 1985. The effects of long-term administration of bovine growth hormone on the lactational performance of identical-twin dairy cows. Animal Production 41: 135–142.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. E., Hafs, H. D., Tucker, H. A., Boyd, L. J., Purchas, R. W. and Huber, J. T. 1972. Growth, mammary, reproductive, and pituitary hormone characteristics of Holstein heifers fed extra grain and melengestrol acetate. Journal of Dairy Science 55: 995–1004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reichert, L. E. Jr 1975. Purification of anterior pituitary hormones (ovine, bovine, rat and rabbit). In Methods of Enzymology. Vol. 37. Hormone Action. Part B. Peplide Hormones (ed. O'Malley, B. W. and Hardman, J. G.). pp. 360–380. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Sandles, L. D. and Peel, C. J. 1987. Growth and carcass composition of pre-pubertal dairy heifers treated with bovine growth hormone. Animal Production 44: 21–27.Google Scholar
Schultz, L. H. 1969. Relationship of rearing rate of dairy heifers to mature performance. Journal of Dairy Science 52: 1321–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sejrsen, K. 1978. Mammary development and milk yield in relation to growth rate in dairy and dual-purpose heifers. Acta Agricullurae Scandinavica 28: 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sejrsen, K., Foldager, J., Sorensen, M. T., Akers, R. M. and Bauman, D. E. 1986. Effect of exogenous bovine somatotropin mammary development in heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 1528–1535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sejrsen, K., Huber, J. T. and Tucker, H. A. 1983. Influence of amount fed on hormone concentrations and their relationship to mammary growth in heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 66: 845–855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinha, Y. N. and Tucker, H. A. 1969. Mammary development and pituitary prolactin levels of heifers from birth through puberty and during the estrus cycle. Journal of Dairy Science 52: 507–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, E. W. 1967. Optimum growth patterns for dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 50: 244–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, J. F. and Veenhuizen, E. L. 1978. Growth performance, carcass composition and plasma hormone levels in wether lambs when treated with growth hormone and thyroprotein. Journal of Animal Science 47: Suppl. 1, p. 397 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Weibel, E. R. 1979. Stereological Methods. Vol. 1. Practical Methods for Biological Morphometry. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar