Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:56:18.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Limb injuries, immune response and growth performance of early-weaned pigs in different housing systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

H. R. C. Kelly*
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, Ferguson Building, Craigstone Estate, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9YA
J. M. Bruce
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, Ferguson Building, Craigstone Estate, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9YA
S. A. Edwards*
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, Ferguson Building, Craigstone Estate, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9YA
P. R. English
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Aberdeen, MacRobert Building, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB24 5UA
V. R. Fowler
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Aberdeen, MacRobert Building, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB24 5UA
*
Present address: Department of Agriculture, University of Aberdeen, MacRobert Building, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB24 5UA.
Present address: Department of Agriculture, University of Aberdeen, MacRobert Building, 581 King Street, Aberdeen AB24 5UA.
Get access

Abstract

The welfare of early-weaned pigs in different housing systems was examined using a range of indicators. Three replicates of 20 pigs were weaned at 6·4 kg live weight into either: (a) deep-straw; (b) Straw-Flow®; (c) large flatdeck; (d) small flatdeck. A kenneled lying area was provided in (a) and (b). The floor in (c) and (d) was expanded metal. Stocking densities were 0·23 m2 per pig in (a), (b) and (c) and 0·17 m2 per pig in (d). After 4 to 5 weeks (19·6 kg live weight), 16 pigs from each pen were moved into Straw-Flow grower pens (0·68 m2 per pig) and observed until slaughter at 90·6 kg. The remaining pigs were grouped together to examine the effects of mixing. At weaning, 24·1% of pigs had foot injuries. Pigs with foot injuries recovered quickly on deep-straw but the injuries increased in flatdecks immediately after weaning (Straw-Flow was intermediate). Injuries were more persistent in the small flatdeck. Deep-straw prevented adventitious bursitis of the hock. After 1 month in the grower pens, there was no residual treatment effect. Antibody response was examined by immune challenge with keyhole limpet haemocyanin (KLH). Immunoglobulin (Ig) response was greater in straw pens. Pigs mixed at 20 kg showed a decreased immune response to KLH challenge. Growth and food intake showed no treatment effects; food conversion ratio was poorer in (c) than in (b) or (d).

Type
Non-ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Algers, B. 1984. Animal health in fiatdeck rearing of weaned piglets. Zentralblatt für Veterinarmedizen Reihe A 31: 113.Google Scholar
Blecha, F., Pollman, D. S. and Nichols, D. A. 1983. Weaning pigs at an early age decreases cellular immunity. Journal of Animal Science 56: 396400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
British Government. 1994. The welfare of livestock regulations 1994. Animals: prevention of cruelty. Statutory Instruments 1994 no. 2126. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, UK.Google Scholar
Britton, M., Roden, J. A., MacPherson, O., Willcox, G. and English, P. R. 1993. A comparison of a straw-based and slatted floor housing system for the weaned pig. Animal Production 56: 477 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Broom, D. M. 1988. The scientific assessment of animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20: 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, J. M. 1990. Straw-Flow as a high welfare system for pigs. Farm Building Progress 102: 913.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. M. and Clark, J. J. 1979. Models of heat production and critical temperature for growing pigs. Animal Production 28: 353369.Google Scholar
Dantzer, R. and Kelley, K. W. 1989. Stress and immunity. Life Sciences 44: 19952008.Google Scholar
Ekesbo, I. 1981. Models for the assessment of the environment from the point of view of animal welfare. Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, 31 August-3 September, Zagreb, Yugoslavia.Google Scholar
Graves, H.B., Graves, K. L. and Sherritt, G. W. 1978. Social behaviour and growth of pigs following mixing during the growing-finishing period. Applied Animal Ethology 4: 169180.Google Scholar
Lyons, C. A. P., Bruce, J. M., Fowler, V. R. and English, P. R. 1995. A comparison of productivity and welfare of growing pigs in four intensive systems. Livestock Production Science 43: 265274.Google Scholar
McGlone, J. J. and Curtis, S. E. 1985. Behaviour and performance of weaners in pens equipped with hide areas. Journal of Animal Science 60: 2024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, A. M. 1994. Effect of husbandry on immune responses and implications for the assessment of welfare in calves. Ph.D. thesis, University of Liverpool, UK. Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1995. Pig yearbook. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley, UK.Google Scholar
Miller, B. and Stokes, C. 1994. The neonatal and post-weaned pig. In Principles of pig science (ed. Cole, D. J. A. Wiseman, J. and Varley, M. A.). Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Pearce, C. A. 1993. Behaviour and other indices of welfare in growing /finishing pigs kept on Straw-Flow(R), bare concrete, full slats and deep straw. Ph.D. thesis, University of Aberdeen. Google Scholar
Richard, S., Bouvier, P., Creed, G., Grenier, E. and Willequet, F. 1993. Relationship between flooring characteristics of the postweaning room and piglet performance. Pig News and Information 14: 79N80N (abstr.).Google Scholar
Roitt, I., Brostoff, J. and Male, D. 1993. Immunology, third edition. Mosby, UK.Google Scholar
Rook, G. A. W., Hernandez-Pando, R. and Lightman, S. L. 1994. Hormones, peripherally activated hormones and regulation of the Thl/Th2 balance. Immunology Today 15: 301303.Google Scholar
Sebestik, V. K., Bogner, H., Fusseder, J., Grauvoglund, A. and Sprengel, D. 1984. Ethologishe und Productionstechnische Untersuchungen an Abgesetzen Ferkeln in drei unterschiedlichen Haltungssystemen. Bayerisches Landwirtschaftliches Jahrbuch 61: 865893.Google Scholar
Smith, W. J. 1992. A study of adventitious bursitis of the hock. DVMS thesis, University of Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Smith, W. J. and Morgan, M. 1992. Adventitious bursitis of the hock — further studies. Proceedings of the 12th international Pig Veterinary Society Conference, The Hague, p. 381 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Veen, H. M. van, Vellenga, L. and Hoogerbrugge, A. 1985. Mortality, morbidity and external injuries in piglets housed in two different housing systems. II. Rearing period of piglets (age 5-5-10 weeks). Veterinary Quarterly 7: 127132.Google Scholar