No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Legume silages as supplements to a maize silage plus urea diet for young calves
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2010
Abstract
Forty British Friesian calves aged approximately 90 days, mean initial live weight 107 kg, were divided into five groups and the animals in each group offered, ad libitum for 84 days, one of five diets based on maize silage. The basal diet of maize silage and 20 g urea/kg dry matter (diet 1) was supplemented with fish meal at 47 g/kg dry matter (diet 2) or with legume silage supplements at 310 g silage dry matter/kg dry matter. The silage supplements were red clover ensiled with formic acid (diet 3), red clover ensiled with formic acid plus formaldehyde at 30 g/kg crude protein (diet 4), or sainfoin ensiled with formic acid (diet 5). Diets 1 to 5 contained 23·7, 28·8, 28·3, 28·3, and 27·1 g total nitrogen/kg dry matter respectively.
The proportion of the total nitrogen insoluble in water, an indicator of the protein in the diet that was likely to escape degradation in the rumen, was 273, 356, 377, 413 and 339 g/kg for diets 1 to 5 respectively. Increasing the proportion of insoluble nitrogen in the diet by including fish meal or formaldehyde-treated red clover silage improved rates of live-weight gain and efficiency of feed conversion. Mean daily intakes of 15·2, 16·2, 16·2, 15·4 and 15·8 g digestible organic matter/kg live weight produced daily live-weight gains of 0·79, 1·05, 0·88, 0·93 and 0·83 kg/head by calves on diets 1 to 5 respectively. Diet 2 produced live-weight gains and gains per kg of digestible organic matter intake that were greater than those for diets 1, 3 or 5 (P<0·05), but not significantly greater than those for diet 4 (P<0·05). Calf live-weight gains were similar and satisfactory on the basal diet (maize silage and urea) and the diets with formic acid-preserved silage of red clover or sainfoin, but poorer than on the diet with 47 g fish meal/kg diet dry matter (P<0·05).
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1980
References
REFERENCES
Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Association Of Official Agricultural Chemists. 1965. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 10th ed. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Cottrill, B. R. and Osbourn, D. F. 1977. The effect of source of nitrogen and energy supplementation on the utilization of maize silage by calves. Anim. Prod. 24: 127–128 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Cottrill, B. R., Osbourn, D. F., Wilkinson, J. M. and Richmond, P. J. 1976. The effect of dietary pH and nitrogen supplementation on the intake and utilization of maize silage by young calves. Anim. Prod. 22: 154–155 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Dewar, W. A. and McDonald, P 1961. Determination of dry matter in silage by distillation with toluene. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 12: 790–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsden, S. R. and Gibson, Q. H. 1954. The estimation of lactic acid using eerie sulphate. Biochem.J. 58: 154–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, A. G., England, P. and Gibbs, B. G. 1978. The effect of level of formaldehyde applied at ensiling on the utilization of red clover silage by young calves. Anim. Prod. 26: 363 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Lonsdale, C. R. 1976. The effect of season of harvest on the utilization of dried grass given alone or as supplements to grass silage. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Reading.Google Scholar
McDougall, E. I. 1948. Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep's saliva. Biochem. J. 43: 99–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osbourn, D. F., Cottrill, B. R. and Beever, D. E. 1978. The evaluation of maize silage for beef production. A. Rep. Grassld Res. Inst. 1977, Hurley, Maidenhead, pp. 90–93.Google Scholar
Osbourn, D. F., Terry, R. A., Cammell, S. B. and Outen, G. E. 1971. The effect of leuco-anthocyanins in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) on the availability of protein to sheep and upon the determination of the acid detergent fibre and lignin fractions. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 30: 13A–14A.Google ScholarPubMed
Roy, J. H. B., Balch, C. C., Miller, E. L., Rskov, E. R. and Smith, R. H. 1977. Calculation of the N requirement for ruminants from nitrogen metabolism studies. Proc. 2nd int. Symp. Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, Lelystad, The Netherlands, pp. 126–129.Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Wilkinson, J. M. and Tayler, J. C. 1975a. The utilization of maize silage for intensive beef production. 1. The effect of level and source of supplementary nitrogen on the utilization of maize silage by cattle of different ages. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 84:353–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, C., Wilson, R. F., Wilkins, R. J. and Wilkinson, J. M. 1975b. The utilization of maize silage for intensive beef production. II. The effect of urea on silage fermentation and on the voluntary intake and performance of young cattle fed maize silage-based diets. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 84: 365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E., Harrison, D. G., Hill, I. W. and Osbourn, D. F. 1971. The digestion of dried lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) and dried sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) by sheep. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 30: 14A–15A.Google ScholarPubMed
Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18: 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. and Wine, R. H. 1967. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. J. Assoc. off. analyt. Chem. 50: 50–55.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, J. M., Penning, Ines M. and Osbourn, D. F. 1978. Effect of stage of harvest and fineness of chopping on the voluntary intake and digestibility of maize silage by young beef cattle. Anim. Prod. 26: 143–150.Google Scholar