Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:12:22.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lactation performance of goats and growth rates of kids under different milking and rearing methods in Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

F. Ruvuna ,
T. C. Cartwright ,
H. Blackburn ,
M. Okeyo  and
S. Chema
F. Ruvuna
Affiliation:
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station, TX 77843, USA
T. C. Cartwright
Affiliation:
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station, TX 77843, USA
H. Blackburn
Affiliation:
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station, TX 77843, USA
M. Okeyo
Affiliation:
Ministry of Livestock Development, Box 58137, Nairobi, Kenya
S. Chema
Affiliation:
Ministry of Livestock Development, Box 58137, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to test different milking procedures for dual-purpose goats that would be suitable for smallholder farmers. In experiment 1, 105 East African and Galla does that kidded to singles were randomly assigned to three treatments: (a) milking in absence of kid and kid sucking residual; (b) milking in presence of kid and kid sucking residual; and (c) milking once a week and kid sucking all milk 6 days of the week. In experiment 2, 45 Galla does that kidded to singles were randomly assigned to three treatments: (a) weigh-suckle-weigh; (b) milking half udder while kid sucking other half and (c) kid sucking all milk in the evening and milking mornings. Measurements of milk yield, milk sucked and weights of kids were taken for 12 weeks of lactation.

Results were analysed using least-squares techniques for unequal subclass numbers. Milking in the presence of kids increased does' milk yield. This increase was attributed to the stimulation of milk let-down by the presence of kids. Although this method potentially provided most milk for dairy use, less residual milk was left to sustain growth of kids. Estimates of total milk yield by milking once a week underestimated milk yield potential of the East African and Galla breeds. Results indicated an appropriate method for estimating milk potential should combine both milked and sucked milk measurements. Restricting milk available to the kids reduced their growth rates and thus indirectly affected their maturing rates. No milking procedure proved to be superior all-around for the smallholder for milking goats. To resolve this dilemma, use of an optimizing technique including socio-economic weighting of milk for family use relative to milk for kids was proposed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 237 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angwenyi, G. N. 1984. Effects of crossbreeding East African, Galla and Boer goats on body size, growth rate and kid survivability in Kenya. MS. Thesis, Texas A & M University, College Station.Google Scholar
Barr, A. J., Goodnight, J. H., Sall, J. P., Blair, W. H. and Chilko, D. M. 1979. A User's Guide to SAS. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Carles, A. B. 1986. The levels of, and constraints to, productivity of goats and sheep at Ngurunit and Korr in Marsabit District. Integrated Project in Arid Lands, Technical Report E-8, UNESCO, Nairobi, pp. 33–117.Google Scholar
Carles, A. B., Schwartz, J. J. and Rutagwenda, T. 1985. Preliminary results from a study of milk yields from the Small East African goat at Isiolo. Proceedings of Small Ruminant Collaborative Research Program, Kenya Workshop, Nairobi, Kenya, pp. 262–269.Google Scholar
Devendra, C. and Burns, M. 1983. Goat Production in the Tropics. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Hadjipanayiotou, M. and Louca, A. 1976. The effects of partial suckling on the lactation performance of Chios sheep and Damascus goats and the growth rate of the lambs and kids. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87: 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louca, A. 1972. The effect of suckling regime on growth rate and lactation performance of the Cyprus Fat-tailed and Chios sheep. Animal Production 15: 53–59.Google Scholar
Louca, A., Mavrogenis, A. and Lawlor, M. J. 1975. The effect of early weaning on the lactation performance of Damascus goats and the growth rate of the kids. Animal Production 20: 213–218.Google Scholar
Mcdowell, R. E. 1978. The potential of the goat for milk production in the tropics. Cornell International Agricultural Mimeograph, No. 60.Google Scholar
Mcdowell, R. E. and Bove, L. 1977. The goat as a producer of meat. Cornell International Agricultural Mimeograph, No. 56.Google Scholar
Ruvuna, F., Cartwright, T. C. and Okeyo, M. A. 1985. The Kenya dual-purpose goat, its development and utility. Proceedings of Small Ruminant Collaborative Research Program, Kenya Workshop, Nairobi, Kenya, pp. 52–54.Google Scholar
Ruvuna, F., Cartwright, T. C., Okeyo, A. M., Muhuyi, W., Ahuya, C. and Kitilit, J. 1984. Effects of partial suckling on lactation performance of Galla and East African goats and the growth rates of the kids. Proceedings of Kenya Workshop, Small Ruminant Collaborative Research Program, Kenya Workshop, Nairobi, Kenya, pp. 203–216.Google Scholar
Ruvuna, F., Cartwright, T. C., Smith, G. M., Bradford, E. G., Berger, Y. M., Ahuya, C. and Muia, J. 1983. Preliminary results of performance of different breeds of goats at Ol'magogo. Proceedings of Small Ruminant Collaborative Research Program, Kenya Workshop, Nairobi, Kenya, pp. 83–98.Google Scholar
Sacker, G. D. and Trail, J. C. M. 1966. Production characteristics of a herd of East African Mubende goats. Tropical Agriculture 43: 43–51.Google Scholar
Winrock International. 1976. The role of sheep and goats in agricultural development. Proceedings of Workshop held at Winrock International Livestock Research and Training Center, Morrilton, Arkansas.Google Scholar