Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:06:18.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of social conditions post-puberty on the sexual behaviour of the domestic male pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. H. Hemsworth ,
C. G. Winfield ,
R. G. Beilharz  and
D. B. Galloway
P. H. Hemsworth
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3052
C. G. Winfield
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Animal Research Institute, Werribee, Victoria, Australia, 3030
R. G. Beilharz
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry and Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3052
D. B. Galloway
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry and Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3052
Get access

Summary

Three groups of four mature boars were housed in individual pens for 3 mo under one of the following social conditions: near ovariectomized female pigs induced into sexual receptivity at 2-week intervals; isolated from female pigs but either with or without visual and physical contact with neighbouring boars. The total number of copulations achieved in six mating tests throughout the period was significantly greater (P<0·01) for the boars housed near sexually receptive females than for those housed in the other two social conditions. For the subsequent 3 mo all boars were housed near sexually receptive females and no significant differences were found between the three groups for total number of copulations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , December 1977 , pp. 305 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, G., Signoret, J. P. and Hafez, E. S. E. 1974. Sexual and maternal behaviour. In Reproduction in Farm Animals, 3rd ed. (ed. Hafez, E. S. E.), pp. 222–256. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Fraser, A. F. 1968. Reproductive Behaviour in Ungulates. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, P. H., Beilharz, R. G. and Galloway, D. B. 1977. Influence of social conditions during rearing on the sexual behaviour of the domestic boar. Anim. Prod. 24: 245–251.Google Scholar
Illius, A. W., Haynes, N. B. and Lamming, G. E. 1976. Effects of ewe proximity on peripheral plasma testosterone levels and behaviour in the ram. J. Reprod. Fert. 48: 25–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Signoret, J. P. 1970. Swine behaviour in reproduction. Proc. Symp. Effect of Disease and Stress on Reproductive Efficiency in Swine. University of Nebraska College of Agriculture, Lincoln, Nebraska.Google Scholar
Vandenbergh, J. G. 1969. Endocrine co-ordination in monkeys: male sexual responses to the female. Physiol. Behav. 4: 261–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar