Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:12:00.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of processing and of certain crude enzyme preparations on the utilisation of cereals by pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. S. Burnett  and
E. L. Neil
G. S. Burnett
Affiliation:
Isaac Andrews & Sons, Belfast, N. Ireland
E. L. Neil
Affiliation:
Isaac Andrews & Sons, Belfast, N. Ireland
Get access

Extract

1. Three group feeding trials and two individual feeding experiments, involving a total of 202 pigs from 8 to 10 weeks of age to bacon weight, were conducted to determine the effect of processing (steaming, followed by rolling and grinding) of maize and barley on pig performance. The effect of supplementation of raw and processed cereal diets with two crude enzyme preparations was also studied.

2. Processing of maize or barley had no significant effects on rate of growth or efficiency of food utilisation in pigs fed on diets containing a proportion of bran and pollard, or of pigs fed on diets in which maize or barley constituted the entire cereal portion.

3. Neither enzyme preparation affected pig performance.

4. The growth rate and efficiency of food utilisation of pigs given diets high in maize were significantly better than for those given diets high in barley.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 1964 , pp. 237 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blish, M. J. & Sandstedt, R. M., 1932. Sugars, diastatic activity and gassing power in flour. Cereal Chem., 9: 378.Google Scholar
Braude, R. & Foot, A. S., 1942. War-time rations for pigs. J. agric. Sci., 32: 70.Google Scholar
Burnett, G. S., 1961. A study of the effects of the processing of cereals on their composition and on their nutritive values for pigs and chickens. M. Agr. Thesis. Queen's University, Belfast.Google Scholar
Burnett, G. S., 1962. The effect of damaged starch, amylolytic enzymes and proteolytic enzymes on the utilisation of cereals by chickens. Brit. Poultry Sci., 3: 89.Google Scholar
Dadswell, I. W. & Gardner, J. F., 1947. The relation of alpha amylase and susceptible starch to diastatic activity. Cereal Chem., 24: 79.Google Scholar
Hills, C. H. & Bailey, C. H., 1938. The nature of the increase in amylase activity of germinating barley. Cereal Chem., 15: 273.Google Scholar
Olsen, W. J., Evans, R. & Dickson, A. D., 1944. A modification of the Kneen & Sandstedt's methods for the determination of alpha and beta amylase in barley malt. Cereal Chem., 21: 533.Google Scholar
Sandstedt, R. M., Kneen, E. & Blish, M. J., 1939. A standardised Wohlgemuth procedure for alpha amylase activity. Cereal Chem., 16: 712.Google Scholar
Sheehy, E. J. & Senior, B. J., 1939. The comparative feeding values for pigs of cereals prepared in the flaked and ground form. J. Dept. Agric. Eire, 36: 230.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E., 1925. Maize and barley for pig feeding. J. Minist. Agric, 31: 12.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E., 1925. Digestion trials with swine. J. agric. Sci. 15: 1.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E., 1954. Rations for livestock. Bull. Minist. Agric. (Lond.) no. 48.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. & Evans, R. E., 1932. The value of degermed maize meal (cooked) in the nutrition of swine. J. agric. Sci., 22: 670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar