Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:35:44.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of nutrition on pre-partum plasma levels of progesterone and total oestrogens and post-partum plasma levels of luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone in suckling cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. Gauthier ,
M. Terqui  and
P. Mauleon
D. Gauthier
Affiliation:
INRA Station de Physiologie de la Reproduction, 37380 Monnaie, France
M. Terqui
Affiliation:
INRA Station de Physiologie de la Reproduction, 37380 Monnaie, France
P. Mauleon
Affiliation:
INRA Station de Physiologie de la Reproduction, 37380 Monnaie, France
Get access

Abstract

Two groups of suckling Charolais cows were fed at different levels of nutrition from 70 days before the estimated date of calving until 45 days after calving, to study the effects of reduced dietary intake on pre-partum plasma levels of progesterone and total oestrogens (conjugated + unconjugated) and post-partum plasma levels of luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone. Eight control cows received a ration containing the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique's recommendations for all nutrients, while 10 cows received a restricted diet which supplied approximately three-quarters of the recommended amounts for energy and nitrogen.

The mean weight of the two groups of cows was similar at the beginning of the experiment but the restricted group had a significantly lower weight just before calving than the control group (678 v. 766 kg; P < 0·05).

After calving, cows ont he low diet had a weight loss of 600 g/day, while those on the control diet gained 300 g/day. During the last 45 days of pregnancy underfeeding did not significantly affect oestrogen levels, but progesterone levels increased proportionally by 0·24 (P < 0·01).

During the first 45 days of lactation underfeeding decreased the number of cows showing oestrus (0/10 v. 4/8) and significantly decreased both luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone levels at 5, 15 and 30 days post partum.

Furthermore, the correlation between mean daily gain (0 to 45 days post partum) and luteinizing hormone concentration on day 30 was highly significant (r = 0·58; P < 0·01; no. = 19). These results suggest that the delay of the first post-partum ovulation in the underfed cow is due to low gonadotropin levels.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , August 1983 , pp. 89 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beal, W. E., Short, R. E., Staigmiller, R. B., Bellows, R. A., Kaltenbach, C. C. and Dunn, T. G. 1978. Influence of dietary energy intake on bovine pituitary and luteal function. J. Anim. Sci. 46: 181–188.Google Scholar
Blanc, M. R. and Poirier, J. C. 1979. A new homologous radioimmunoassay for ovine follicle stimulating hormone. Development and characterization. Annls Biol. anim. Biochim, Biophys. 19: 1011–1026.Google Scholar
Coetzer, W. A., Van Niekerk, C. H. and Morgenthal, J. C. 1978. Hormone levels in peripheral plasma of the Afrikaner cows. Progesterone levels during the post-partum period. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 8: 11–14.Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. E., Bassett, J. M. and Thorburn, G. D. 1970. Peripheral plasma progesterone concentration of cows during puberty, oestrus cycles, pregnancy and lactation, and the effects of undernutrition or exogenous oxytocin on progesterone concentration. J. Endocr. 48: 599–614.Google Scholar
Dunn, T. G., Rone Janice Kaltenbach, C. C., Van Der Walt, L. A., Riley, M. L. and Akbar, A. M. 1974. Hormone changes during underfeeding of beef cows. J. Anim. Sci. 39: 206 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Dyck, G. W., Palmer, W. M. and Simaraks, S. 1980. Progesterone and luteinizing hormone concentration in serum of pregnant gilts on different levels of feed consumption. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 60: 877–884.Google Scholar
Findlay, J. K. and Cumming, I. A. 1976. FSH in the ewe: effects of season, live weight and plane of nutrition on plasma FSH and ovulation rate. Biol. Reprod. 15: 335–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, J. L. and Hafs, H. D. 1971. Analysis of repeated measurements of animals. J. Anim. Sci. 33: 331–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gombe, S. and Hansel, W. 1973. Plasma luteinizing hormone (LH) and progesterone levels in heifers on restricted energy intakes. J. Anim. Sci. 37: 728–733.Google Scholar
Hill, J. R., Lamond, D. R., Henricks, D. M., Dickey, J. F. and Niswender, G. D. 1970. The effects of undernutrition on ovarian function and fertility in beef heifers. Biol. Reprod. 2: 78–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holness, D. H., Hopley, J. D. H. and Hale, D. H. 1978. The effects of plane of nutrition, live weight, temporary weaning and breed on the occurrence of oestrus in beef cows during the post-partum period. Anim. Prod. 26: 47–54.Google Scholar
Howland, B. E. 1972. Effect of restricted feed intake on LH levels in female rats. J. Anim. Sci. 34: 445–447.Google Scholar
Palmer, E. and Terqui, M. 1977. The measurement of total plasma oestrogens during the follicular phase of the mare's oestrus cycle. Theriogenology 7: 331–338.Google Scholar
Pelletier, J. 1972. Ovine and bovine plasma LH radioimmunoassays technique. In Les Techniques Radioimmunologiques, Colloque inserm; hôpital St-Antoine, Paris, pp. 237–255.Google Scholar
Pelletier, J. and Thimonier, J. 1975. Interactions between ovarian steroids or progestagens and LH release. Annls Biol. anim. Biochim. Biophys. 15: 175–180.Google Scholar
Sertich, P. L., Kaltenbach, C. C., Dunn, T. G. and Klindt, J. M. 1979. Endocrine enzyme and fetal weight parameters in the undernourished ewe. J. Anim. Sci. 49: Supp. 1, p. 336 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Smith, V. G., Edgerton, L. A., Hafs, H. D. and Convey, E. M. 1973. Bovine serum estrogens, progestins and glucocorticoids during late pregnancy, parturition and early lactation. J. Anim. Sci. 36: 391–396.Google Scholar
Spitzer, J. C., Niswender, G. D., Seidel, G. E. and Wiltbank, J. N. 1978. Fertilization and blood levels of progesterone and LH in beef heifers on a restricted energy diet. J. Anim. Sci. 46: 1071–1077.Google Scholar
Stabenfeldt, G. H., Oxborn, B. I. and Ewing, L. L. 1970. Peripheral plasma progesterone levels in the cow during pregnancy and parturition. Am. J. Physiol. 218: 571–577.Google Scholar
Teroui, M., Garnier, D. H., De Reviers, M. M., Huet, S. and Pelletier, J. 1980. Chronological organisation of hormonal signals between pituitary and gonads in domestic mammals. In Rhythmes et Reproduction (ed. Ortavant, R. and Reinberg, A.), pp. 59–72. Masson, Paris.Google Scholar
Thatcher, W. W., Lewis, G. S., Eley, R. M., Bazer, F. W., Fields, M. J., Williams, W. F. and Wilcox, C. J. 1980. Contribution of the bovine conceptus to the endocrinological phenomenon existing at implantation during gestation and around parturition. Proc. 9th int. Congr. Anim. Reprod. and. A. I., Madrid 1, pp. 9–22.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. C., Strohbehn, R. E. and Harris, P. A. 1972. ACTH, corticoids and luteal function in heifers. J. Ann i. Sci. 35: 789–793.Google ScholarPubMed
Wiltbank, J. N., Rowden, W. W., Ingaels, J. E. and Zimmerman, D. R. 1964. Influence of post-partum energy level on reproductive performance of Hereford cows restricted in energy intake prior to calving. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 1049–1053.Google Scholar
Yenikoye, A., Mariana, J. C., Ley, J. P., Jolivet, E., Teroui, M. and Lemon-Resplandy, M. 1981. A mathematical model of the cow progesterone pattern: application and proof of breed differences. Reprod. Nutr. Dev 21: 561–575.Google Scholar