Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:13:15.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of genetic index for milk production on the response to complete diet feeding and the utilization of energy and nitrogen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

F. J. Gordon ,
D. C. Patterson ,
T. Yan ,
M. G. Porter ,
C. S. Mayne  and
E. F. Unsworth
F. J. Gordon
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX Agricultural and Environmental Science Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland
D. C. Patterson
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX Agricultural and Environmental Science Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland
T. Yan
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR
M. G. Porter
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Environmental Science Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland
C. S. Mayne
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX Agricultural and Environmental Science Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland
E. F. Unsworth
Affiliation:
The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX Agricultural and Environmental Science Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland
Get access

Abstract

Thirty-six Holstein/Friesian cows were used in a 3 × 2 factorial design randomized-block experiment to evaluate the production and nutrient utilization responses of animals of three genetic indices (cow genetic index 90 (CGI); 950, 650 and 550), each given either a complete diet (CD) or concentrate separate from grass silage through out-ofparlour feeders (OPF). The experiment included days 11 to 160 of lactation. On the CD treatment the diet was offered ad libitum with a concentrate proportion of 0.64 (dry matter (DM) basis), while on the OPF treatment the grass silage urns offered ad libitum and the allowance of concentrate was made equal to the mean concentrate intake of the CD treatment during the previous week. The concentrate was based on barley, maize gluten, molassed sugar-beet pulp, citrus pulp, soya-bean meal, fish meal and protected fat. During the experiment eight blocks each of six animals were used in metabolism studies to determine total ration digestibility, nitrogen balance and energy utilization.

No significant feeding method × genetic index interactions were found in terms of food intake, milk production or nutrient utilization. Although CGI had no significant effect on total DM intake, silage DM intake increased linearly as the cow CGI increased (P < 0.01) across the CD and OPF treatments. The high CGI cows produced respectively 6.60 and 8.25 kg/day more milk fP < 0.001) than the medium and low CGI animals without altering milk concentrations of fat and protein, but with on average a negative live-weight change with the high CGI cows. Although nitrogen digestibility was significantly higher with the low than medium CGI cows (P < 0.05), cow CGI had no significant effects on DM and energy digestibilities, daily methane energy output, heat production or the efficiency of utilization of metabolizable energy for lactation fk,) in the metabolism study. The results indicated that higher milk production with the high CGI cows was mainly attributed to an alteration in nutrient partitioning between milk energy and body energy retention.

Across the three genetic indices, feeding method had no significant effect on total DM intake, although silage DM intake was 0.46 kg/day higher (P < 0-05) on the OPF treatment. However feeding the complete diet resulted in 3.04 kg/day more milk CP < 0.05) than feeding concentrate separate from silage without altering milk concentrations of fat and protein. In the nutrient metabolism study whole tract digestibilities of DM (F < 0.001), nitrogen (P < 0.05) and energy (P < 0.01) were higher on the OPF treatment, but methane energy output and heat production were similar between the two treatments.

Keywords

cowsfeeding methodgenetic indexmilk productionnutrition physiology
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , October 1995 , pp. 199 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnew, K. W. 1992. An examination of the effects of diet and feeding method on the composition of milk of lactating dairy cows. Ph.D. thesis, The Queen's University of Belfast.Google Scholar
Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1990. Technical committee on responses to nutrients. Report no. 5. Nutritive requirements of ruminant animals: energy. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series B 60: 729–804.Google Scholar
Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1992. Technical committee on responses to nutrients. Report no. 9. Nutritive requirements of ruminant animals: protein. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series B 62: 787–835.Google Scholar
Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. An advisory manual prepared by the AFRC Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Belyea, R. L. and Adams, M. W. 1990. Energy and nitrogen utilisation of high versus low producing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 73: 1023–1030.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Sutton, J. D., Bines, J. A., Broster, V. J., Smith, T., Siviter, J. W., Johnson, V. W., Napper, D. J. and Schuller, E. 1985. The influence of plane of nutrition and diet composition on the performance of dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 104: 535–557.Google Scholar
Chase, L. E. 1993. Developing nutrition programs for high producing dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 76: 3287–3293.Google Scholar
Coulon, J. B. and Remond, B. 1991. Variations in milk output and milk protein content in response to the level of energy supply to the dairy cow: a review. Livestock Production Science 29: 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushnahan, A. 1993. An examination of some factors which may influence the production potential of grazed and conserved forages by ruminants. Ph.D. thesis, The Queen's University of Belfast, pp. 291–295.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. P. 1984. The effects of frequency of feeding on milk production of dairy cattle: an analysis of published results. Animal Production 38: 181–189.Google Scholar
Gill, M. 1979. The principles and practice of feeding ruminants on complete diets. Grass and Forage Science 34: 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1994. Hillsborough confirms value of indexes. Holstein Friesian Journal 76: 58–59.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J., Porter, M. G., Mayne, C. S., Unsworth, E. F. and Kilpatrick, D. J. 1995. The effect of forage digestibility and type of concentrate on nutrient utilisation for lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Research 62: 15–27.Google Scholar
Grainger, C., Holmes, C. W. and Moore, Y. F. 1985. Performance of Friesian cows with high and low breeding indexes. 2. Energy and nitrogen balance experiments with lactating and pregnant, non-lactating cows. Animal Production 40: 389–400.Google Scholar
Holstein Friesian Journal. 1994. Pedigree index league. Holstein Friesian Journal 76: 892–895.Google Scholar
Holter, J. B., Urban, W. E., Hayes, H. H. and Davis, H. A. 1977. Utilisation of diet components fed blended or separately to lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 60: 1288–1293.Google Scholar
Istasse, I., Reid, G. W., Tait, C. A. G. and Ørskov, E. R. 1986. Concentrates for dairy cows: effects of feeding method, proportion in diet and type. Animal Feed Science and Technology 15: 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, G. C., Thurmon, H. S., Olson, H. H. and Reed, A. 1966. Complete feed rations to lactating dairy cows. journal of Dairy Science 49: 1058–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayne, C. S. and Gordon, F. J. 1984. The effect of type of concentrate and level of concentrate feeding on milk production. Animal Production 39: 65–76.Google Scholar
Nocek, J. E., Steele, R. L. and Braund, D. G. 1986. Performance of dairy cows fed forage and grain separately versus a total mixed ration. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 2140–2147.Google Scholar
Phipps, R. H., Bines, J. A., Fulford, R. J. and Weller, R. F. 1984. Complete diets for dairy cows: a comparison between complete diets and separate ingredients. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 103: 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purwanto, B. P., Abo, Y., Sakamoto, R., Furumoto, F. and Yamamoto, S. 1990. Diurnal patterns of heat production and heart rate under thermoneutral conditions in Holstein Friesian cows differing in milk production. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 114: 139–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, R. W. and Morita, K. 1967. Effect of frequency and method of feeding on performance of lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 50: 585–586.Google Scholar
Swanson, G. 1991. Individual animal model. Holstein Friesian Journal 73: 625–626.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, H. F. and Reid, J. T. 1965. Prediction of the energy value of cow's milk. Journal of Dairy Science 48: 1215–1233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unsworth, E. F. and Gordon, F. J. 1984. The energy utilisation of wilted and unwilted grass silages by lactating dairy cows. Fifth-eighth annual report of the Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, pp. 13–20.Google Scholar
Van Es, A. J. H. 1975. Feed evaluation for dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 2: 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villavicencio, E., Rusoff, L. L., Girouard, R. E. and Waters, W. H. 1968. Comparison of complete feed rations to a conventional ration for lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 51: 1633–1838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiktorsson, H. and Bengtsson, A. 1973. Feeding dairy cattle during the first part of lactation. 2. Comparison of adlib. feeding of wilted hay silage and concentrate blended or separate. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 3: 161–166.Google Scholar