Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:38:08.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of castration on the growth of male pigs in relation to high levels of dietary protein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. H. D. Prescott  and
G. E. Lamming
J. H. D. Prescott
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
G. E. Lamming
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Get access

Extract

1. A factorial split-plot experiment was conducted to investigate the growth of entire and castrate male pigs on conventional diets and diets containing higher levels of protein. Thirty-two Large White pigs were fed ad libitum from 50 lb to slaughter at 260 lb live weight. The carcasses were dissected.

2. The live-weight gain of entire males was the same as that of castrates on the conventional diet, but they grew non-significantly faster than castrates on the higher protein diet.

3. The entire males had a lower dressing percentage and less fat in the carcass than the castrates, but more lean, bone and rind, and a similar lean: bone ratio. The leanness of the entire males was increased on the higher level of dietary protein whereas the leanness of the castrates was unaffected except in the leg. The interactions were not significant.

4. The carcasses of the entire males were proportionately heavier in the head and shoulders and lighter in the middle than those of the castrates.

5. The majority of the entire males had flesh with a slightly tainted flavour.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , November 1967 , pp. 535 - 545
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blair, R., & English, P. R., 1965. The effect of sex on growth and carcass quality in the bacon pig. J. agric. Sci., Camb., 64: 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowland, J. P., & Berg, R. T., 1959. The influence of strain and sex on the relationship of protein to energy in the rations of growing and finishing bacon pigs. Canad. J. Anim. Sci., 39: 102–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratzler, L. J., Soule, R. P. Jnr., Reineke, E. P., & Paul, P., 1954. The effect of testosterone and castration on the growth and carcass characteristics of swine. J. Anim. Sci., 13: 171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charette, L. A., 1961. The effects of sex and age of male at castration on growth and carcass quality of Yorkshire swine. Canad. J. Anim. Sci., 41: 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochakian, C. D., Tillotson, C., Austin, J., Dougherty, E., Haag, V., & Coalson, R., 1956. The effect of castration on the weight and composition of the muscles of the guinea pig. Endocrinology, 58: 315–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochakian, C. D., & Tillotson, C., 1957. The influence of several C19 steroids on the growth of the individual muscles of the guinea pig. Endocrinology, 60: 607–618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochakian, C. D., Tillotson, C., & Austin, J., 1957. A comparison of the effect of inanition, castration and testosterone on the muscles of the male guinea pig. Endocrinology, 60: 144–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luscombe, J. R., 1962. To cut or not to cut. Pig Fmg, Oct. pp. 49–51.Google Scholar
Plimpton, R. F. Jnr., Teague, H. S., Kunkle, L. E., Moxon, A. L., & Cahill, V. R., 1961. Stilboestrol influence on boar pork acceptance. J. Anim. Sci., 20: 920 (Soc. Proc.).Google Scholar
Prescott, J. H. D., (1963). The influence of sex and certain steroids on the growth of the pig. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Prescott, J. H. D., & Lamming, G. E., 1964. The effects of castration on meat production in cattle, sheep and pigs. J. agric. Sci., Camb., 63: 341–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D. W., 1962. Protein and energy nutrition of the bacon pig. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, H. R., & Culik, R., 1955. Lysine requirement of the growing rat as a function of the productive energy level of the diet. J. Anim. Sci., 14: 1221 (Soc. Proc.).Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W., 1956. Statistical Methods. 5th ed.Iowa State College Press, Ames, Ia.Google Scholar
Speer, V. C., Lasley, E. L., Ashton, G. C., Hazel, L. N., & Catron, D. V., 1957. Protein levels for growing boars on pasture and concrete drylot. J. Anim. Sci., 16: 607–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teague, H. S., Cahill, V. C., Plimpton, R. F., Grifo, A. P., & Kunkle, L. E., 1962. The influence of DES implantation and hydrocortisone acetate feeding on the growth and carcass characteristics of boars. Ohio agric. Exp. Stn., Anim. Sci. Mimeo. no. 127.Google Scholar
Tribble, L. F., Amick, G. L., Lasley, J. F., & Zobrisky, S. E., 1965. The effects of stilbestrol and sex condition on growth, carcass characteristics and reproductive organs of swine. Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Stn. no. 881.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R., 1944. The influence of sex upon carcass quality and efficiency of food utilisation. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod., pp. 64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, L. M., Comstock, R. E., Jordan, D. F., & Kiser, O. M., 1942. The effect of sex on the development of the pig. I. Differences in growth between boars and barrows by lines of breeding. J. Anim. Sci., 1: 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar