Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:06:46.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of calving season on the interactions among reproductive disorders of dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. Labernia ,
F. Lopez-Gatius ,
P. Santolaria ,
C. Hanzen ,
Y. Laurent  and
J. Y. Houtain
J. Labernia
Affiliation:
Departament de Producció Animal, Universitat de Lleida, Rovira Roure 177, 25198 Lleida, Spain
F. Lopez-Gatius
Affiliation:
Departament de Producció Animal, Universitat de Lleida, Rovira Roure 177, 25198 Lleida, Spain
P. Santolaria
Affiliation:
Departament de Producció Animal, Universitat de Lleida, Rovira Roure 177, 25198 Lleida, Spain
C. Hanzen
Affiliation:
Service d‘Obstétrique et des Troubles de la Reproduction, Université de Liège, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, B41 Sart Tilman, B-4000 Liège, Belgium
Y. Laurent
Affiliation:
Departament de Producció Animal, Universitat de Lleida, Rovira Roure 177, 25198 Lleida, Spain
J. Y. Houtain
Affiliation:
Service d‘Obstétrique et des Troubles de la Reproduction, Université de Liège, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, B41 Sart Tilman, B-4000 Liège, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of calving season on the interactions among reproductive disorders prior to conception and their effect on subsequent reproductive performance in dairy cows. Data from 3170 lactations of Holstein-Friesian cows that subsequently conceived were analysed by means of path analysis techniques. The cows were from nine commercial dairy herds in north-eastern Spain. Lactation incidence rates for retained placenta, metritis, ovarian cysts and repeat breeding (more than four artificial inseminations per conception) were 6·4, 3·7, 5·4 and 7·9%, respectively, and there were no differences between warm (May to September) and cool (October to April) calving seasons. However, our data show that calving season influenced the interrelationships among reproductive traits. Lactation number was not related to any of the path model variables for cows calving in cool seasons and retained placenta did not directly influence ovarian cysts or repeat breeding. In contrast, older cows that calved during warm seasons showed an increased risk of experiencing retained placenta, ovarian cysts and more days open; retained placenta was a direct risk factor for ovarian cysts and repeat breeding. Our data indicated that a cool season decreased interactions among reproductive disorders of dairy cows. Cows that calved in a cool environment could more effectively cope with reproductive disorders prior to conception and this fact was mainly observed in older cows.

Keywords

calvingdairy cowspath analysisreproductive disordersseasonal variation
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 67 , Issue 3 , December 1998 , pp. 387 - 393
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashmawy, A. A., Vogt, D. W., Garverick, H. A. and Youngquist, R. S. 1992. Incidences and associations of cystic ovaries with production and reproduction traits in dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 109: 129–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, P. C., Kirk, J. H. and Mather, E. C. 1986. Repeated insemination in Michigan Holstein-Friesian cattle: incidence, descriptive epidemiology and estimated economic impact. Theriogenology. 26: 309–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bigras-Poulin, M., Meek, A. H., Martin, S. W. and McMillan, I. 1990. Health problems in selected Ontario Holstein cows: frequency of occurrences, time to first diagnosis and associations. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 10: 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnett, B. N. and Martin, S. W. 1995. Path analysis of peripartum and postparrum events, rectal palpation findings, endometrial biopsy results and reproductive performance in Holstein-Friesian cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 21: 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapin, C. A. and Van Vleck, L. D. 1980. Effects of twinning on lactation and days open in Holsteins. journal of Dairy Science. 63: 1881–1886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correa, M. T., Curtis, C. R., Erb, H. N., Scarlett, J. M. and Smith, R. D. 1990. An ecological analysis of risk factors for postparrum disorders of Holstein Friesian cows from thirty-two New York farms, journal of Dairy Science. 73: 1515–1523.Google Scholar
Erb, H. N. and Martin, S. W. 1980. Interrelationships between production and reproductive diseases in Holstein cows, journal of Dairy Science. 63: 1911–1917.Google Scholar
Erb, H. N., Martin, S. W., Ison, N. and Swaminathan, S. 1981a. Interrelationships between production and reproductive diseases in Holstein cows. Conditional relationship between production and disease. Data. Journal of Dairy Science. 64: 272–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erb, H. N., Martin, S. W., Ison, N. and Swaminathan, S. 1981b. Interrelationships between production and reproductive diseases in Holstein cows. Path analysis. Journal of Dairy Science 64: 282–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erb, H. N., Smith, R. D., Oltenacu, P. A., Guard, C. L., Hillman, R. B., Powers, P. A., Smith, M. C. and White, M. E. 1985. Path model of reproductive disorders and performance, milk fever, mastitis, milk yield, and culling in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 3337–3349.Google Scholar
Fonseca, F. A., Britt, J. H., McDaniel, B. T., Wilk, J. C. and Rakes, A. H. 1983. Reproductive traits of Holsteins and lerseys. Effects of age, milk yield, and clinical abnormalities on involution of cervix and uterus, ovulation, estrous cycles, detection of estrus, conception rate, and days open. Journal of Dairy Science 66: 1128–1147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francos, G. and Mayer, E. 1988. Analysis of fertility indices of cows with reproductive disorders and of normal cows in herds with low and normal fertility. Theriogenology. 29: 413–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fulkerson, W. J. 1984. Reproduction in dairy cattle: effect of age, cow condition, production level, calving-to-first service interval and the male. Animal Reproduction Science. 7: 305–314.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. F. T., Hartigan, P. J. and Nunn, W. R. 1974. Nonspecific uterine infection and bovine fertility. II. Infection patterns and endometritis before and after service. Theriogenology 1: 107–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grohn, Y. T., Erb, H. N., McCulloch, C. E. and Saloniemi, H. S. 1990. Epidemiology of reproductive disorders in dairy cattle: associations among host characteristics, disease and production. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 8: 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwazdauskas, F. C. 1985. Effects of climate on reproduction in cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 68: 1568–1578.Google Scholar
Halpern, N. E., Erb, H. N. and Smith, R. D. 1985. Duration of retained fetal membranes and subsequent fertility in dairy cows. Theriogenology. 23: 807–813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joosten, I., Stelwagen, J. and Dijkhuizen, A. A. 1988. Economic and reproductive consequences of retained placenta in dairy cattle. Veterinary Record. 123: 53–57. Kruif, A. de. 1978. Factors influencing the fertility of a cattle population. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 54: 507–518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markusfeld, O. 1987. Periparturient traits in seven high dairy herds. Incidence rates, association with parity, and interrelationships among traits. Journal of Dairy Science. 70: 158–166.Google Scholar
Markusfeld, O. 1990. Risk of recurrence of eight periparturient and reproductive traits of dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 9: 279–286.Google Scholar
Martinez, J. and Thibier, M. 1984. Reproductive disorders i n dairy cattle. I.Respective influence of herds, seasons, milk yield and parity. Theriogenology. 21: 569–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellado, M. and Reyes, C. 1994. Associations between periparturient disorders and reproductive efficiency in Holstein cows in northern Mexico. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 19: 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohammed, H. O., White, M. E. and LaFaunce, N. 1991. Multivariate analysis of factors associated with calving interval and calving rate in dairy cows. Theriogenology. 35: 443–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrow, D. A., Roberts, S. J. and McEntee, K. 1969. A review of postpartum ovarian activity and involution of the uterus and cervix in cattle. Cornell Veterinarian. 59: 134–154.Google Scholar
Nakao, T., Moriyoshi, M. and Kawata, K. 1992. The effect of postpartum ovarian dysfunction and endometritis on subsequent reproductive performance in high and medium producing dairy cows. Theriogenology 37: 341–349.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1989. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, sixth revised edition. National Academic Science, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Nielen, M., Schukken, Y. H., Scholl, D. T., Wilbrink, H. J. and Brand, A. 1989. Twinning in dairy cattle: a study of risk factors and effects. Theriogenology. 32: 845–862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peeler, E. J., Otte, M. J. and Esslemont, R. J. 1994. Recurrence odds ratios for periparturient diseases and reproductive traits of dairy cows. British Veterinary Journal 150: 481–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pellissier, C. L. 1972. Herd breeding problems and their consequences. Journal of Dairy Science. 55: 385–395.Google Scholar
Shanks, R. D., Freeman, A. E. and Berger, P. J. 1979. Relationship of reproductive factors with interval and rate of conception. Journal of Dairy Science. 62: 74–81.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1990. SASISTAT user's guide, version 6, 4th edition. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Thatcher, W. W. 1974. Effects of season, climate, and temperature on reproduction and lactation. Journal of Dairy Science. 57: 360–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar