Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T01:38:34.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of animal age and sward height on the herbage intake and grazing behaviour of Charolais cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. Ferrer Cazcarra  and
M. Petit
R. Ferrer Cazcarra
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Adaptation des Herbivores aux Milieux, INRA, Theix, 63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
M. Petit
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Adaptation des Herbivores aux Milieux, INRA, Theix, 63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
Get access

Abstract

Mature dry cows, 18-month-old heifers and 7-month-old female calves of the Charolais breed (eight animals of each age) were strip-grazed on moderate (15cm) or tall (52 and 32cm) cocksfoot swards over two 15-day experimental periods. The swards were leafy regrowths of 2 (short) and 8 (tall) weeks of age. Herbage intake was estimated by the alkane method, and grazing behaviour was visually recorded.

Bite weight was lower, grazing time and biting rate greater, and organic matter in take of grass (OMIG) higher on shorter swards, the latter being related to a higher in vitro digestibility and nitrogen concentration. Average OMIG per kg live weight (M) was 15·2, 19·1 and 17·0 (s.e.d. 0·49)g in cows, heifers and calves respectively. The average allometric coefficient between OMIG and M was 0·88 (similar between swards), and close to that obtained with hay after the grazing trial.

Faecal markers suggested a greater selectivity of calves compared with older cattle. Average bite weights (BW) were 310 (s.e. 40), 467 (s.e. 112) and 718 (s.e. 144)mg OM in calves, heifers and cows respectively. The allometric coefficient between BW and M was higher in short swards than in tall ones. Biting rates increased and grazing times tended to decrease with age of cattle.

Keywords

agecattlegrazing behaviourintakesward height
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 61 , Issue 3 , December 1995 , pp. 497 - 506
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agabriel, J., D'hour, P. and Petit, M. 1987. Influence de l'age et de la race sur la capacite d'ingestion des femelles bovines. Reproduction Nutrition and Development 27: 211–212.Google Scholar
Allden, W. G. and Whittaker, A. M. 1970. The determinants of herbage intake by grazing sheep: the interrelationship of factors influencing herbage intake and availability. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 21: 755–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aufrère, J. and Michalet-Doreau, B. 1988. Comparison of methods for predicting digestibility of feeds. Animal Feed, Science and Technology 20: 203–218.Google Scholar
Baker, R. D., Alvarez, F., Le Du, Y. L. P. 1981. The herbage intake and performance of set-stocked suckler cows and calves. Grass and Forage Science 36: 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brun, J. P., Prache, S. and Béchet, G. 1984. A portable device for eating behaviour studies. Proceedings of the fifth European grazing workshop.Google Scholar
Chacon, E. and Stobbs, T. H. 1976. Influence of progressive defoliation of a grass sward on the eating behaviour of cattle. Australian journal of Agricultural Research 27: 709–727.Google Scholar
Demment, M. W. and Laca, E. A. 1993. The grazing ruminant: models and experimental techniques to relate sward structure and intake. Proceedings of the world conference on animal production, Edmonton, Canada, pp. 439–460.Google Scholar
Demment, M. W. and Van Soest, P. J. 1985. A nutritional explanation for body-size patterns of ruminant and nonruminant herbivores. American Naturalist 125: 641–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, T. D. A. 1988. Researching the plant-animal interface: the investigation of ingestive behaviour in grazing animals. Journal of Animal Science 66: 2369–2379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodgson, J. 1982. Ingestive behaviour. In Herbage intake handbook (ed. Leaver, J. D.), pp. 113–118. British Grassland Society.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. 1985. The control of herbage intake in the grazing ruminant. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 44: 339–346.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. 1986. Grazing behaviour and herbage intake. In Grazing (ed. Frame, J.), occasional symposium, British Grassland Society, no. 19, pp. 51–64.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. and Jamieson, W. S. 1981. Variations in herbage mass and digestibility, and the grazing behaviour and herbage intake of adult cattle and weaned calves. Grass and Forage Science 36: 39–48.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J., Rodriguez Capriles, J. M. and Fenlon, J. S. 1977. The influence of sward characteristics on the herbage intake of grazing calves. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89: 743–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. and Wilkinson, J. M. 1967. The relationship between live-weight and herbage intake in grazing cattle. Animal Production 9: 365–376.Google Scholar
Holmes, W., Jones, J. G. W. and Drake-Brockman, R. M. 1961. The feed intake of grazing cattle. II. The influence of size of animal on feed intake. Animal Production 3: 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, F. P., Telford, J. P., McCroskey, J. E. and Stephens, D. F. 1979. Relationship of animal performance and dry matter intake to chemical constituents of grazed forage. Journal of Animal Science 49: 1051–1058.Google Scholar
Illius, A. W. 1989. Allometry of food intake and grazing behaviour with body size in cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 113: 259–266.Google Scholar
Illius, A. W. and Gordon, I. J. 1987. The allometry of food intake in grazing ruminants. Journal of Animal Ecology 56: 989–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique. 1988. [Ruminant nutrition. Recommended allowances and food tables] (ed. Jarrige, R.). Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris.Google Scholar
Jamieson, W. S. and Hodgson, J. 1979. The effect of daily herbage allowance and sward characteristics upon the ingestive behaviour and herbage intake of calves under strip-grazing management. Grass and Forage Science 34: 261–271.Google Scholar
Leaver, J. D. 1970. A comparison of grazing systems for dairy herd replacements. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75: 265–272.Google Scholar
Le Du, Y. L. P. and Baker, R. D. 1981. The digestibility of herbage selected by oesophageally fistulated cows, steer calves and wether sheep strip-grazing together. Grass and Forage Science 36: 237–239.Google Scholar
Mayes, R. W., Lamb, C. S. and Colgrove, P. M. 1986. The use of dosed and herbage n-alkanes as markers for the determination of herbage intake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107: 161–170.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1988. SAS/STAT user's guide, release 6.03 edition, pp. 549–640. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S., Murray, J. I. and Illius, A. W. 1987. Relative growth of incisor arcade breadth and eating rate in cattle and sheep. Animal Production 45: 453–458.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. 1963. Use of detergents in the analyses of fibrous feeds. A rapid method for the determination of fiber and lignin. Journal of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists 46: 829–835.Google Scholar
Verité, R. and Journet, M. 1970. Influence de la teneur en eau et de al deshydratation de l'herbe sur sa valeur alimentaire pour les vaches laitieres. Annales de Zootechnie 19: 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vulich, S. A. and Hanrahan, J. P. 1990. Determination of herbage and faecal n-alkane concentrations: sources of sampling variation. Proceedings of the seventh European grazing workshop, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Zoby, J. L. F. and Holmes, W. 1983. The influence of size of animal and stocking rate on the herbage intake and grazing behaviour of cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100: 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar