Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:35:20.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heritabilities and genetic correlations of egg production and other characters in a White Wyandotte flock

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1961

R. W. Hale
R. W. Hale
Affiliation:
The Queen's University of Belfast and the Ministry of Agriculture, Northern Ireland
Get access

Extract

Five years' records of unculled White Wyandotte flocks at Hillsborough, Northern Ireland, were analysed to give estimates of heritabilities and of genetic and environmental correlations by two methods. Pooling data for four years and eliminating hatch effects gave heritabilities of 0·28 for eggs laid by survivors to 500 days; 0·61 for weight of pullets at penning; 0·51 for weight of pullets at 8 weeks; 0·18 for days to first egg; and 0·71 for spring egg weight. These are in general agreement with most other published figures, as are most of the genetic correlations. A suggestion of sex-linkage in the genetic correlations between weight at 8 weeks and days to maturity was not supported by other figures from the data. The method of eliminating hatch effects, unexpectedly, gave higher heritability figures where heritability was already moderate or high. It gave numerically greater figures in most genetic correlations, but did not lead to an expected reduction in the environmental correlations. The data were probably inadequate for a rigorous test of the method.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , February 1961 , pp. 73 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abplanalp, H., 1957. Genetic and environmental correlations among production traits of poultry. Poult. Sci., 36: 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, G. E., 1957. Genetic covariation among some economic characters of Leghorn-type chickens. Poult. Sci., 36: 1112 (Soc. Proc).Google Scholar
Dillard, E. V., Dickerson, G. E., & Lamoreux, W. F., 1953. Heritabilities of egg and meat production qualities and their genetic and environmental relationships in New Hampshire pullets. Poult. Sci., 32: 897 (Soc. Proc).Google Scholar
El-Ibiary, H. M., & Shaffner, C. S., 1951. The effect of induced hypothyroidism on the genetics of growth in the chicken. Poult. Sci., 30: 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S., 1960. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Oliver & Boyd, Ltd., Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, G. M., & Nordskog, A. W., 1955. Estimates of genetic parameters influencing blood spots and other economic traits of the fowl. Poult. Sci., 34: 1192 (Soc. Proc).Google Scholar
Goodman, B. L., & Godfrey, G. F., 1956. Heritability of body weight in the domestic fowl. Poult. Sci., 35: 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowe, R. S., Johnson, A. S., Crawford, R. D., Downs, J. H., Hill, A. T., Mountain, W. F., Pelletier, J. R., & Strain, J. H., 1960. Restricted versus full-feeding during the growing period for egg production stock. Brit. Poult. Sci., 1: 37.Google Scholar
Hale, R. W., 1952. Experimental errors in laying experiments. J. agric. Sci., 42: 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, R. W., 1954. Heritability of chick viability in a White Wyandotte flock. J. agric. Sci., 44: 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, R. W., 1959a. Heritability of laying-house viability in a White Wyandotte flock. Poult. Sci., 38: 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, R. W., 1959b. Absence of pen effects in laying experiments on a semi-intensive plant. Poult. Sci., 38: 739 (Research note).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazel, L. N., & Lamoreux, W. F., 1947. Heritability, maternal effects and nicking in relation to sexual maturity and body weight in White Leghorns. Poult. Sci., 26: 508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, A. F., 1958. Heritability and correlation analyses of egg weight, egg shape and egg number in chickens. Poult. Sci., 37: 967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HogsettM., L. M., L. & Nordskog, A. W., 1958. Genetic-economic value in selecting for egg production rate, body weight and egg weight. Poult. Sci., 37: 1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerome, F. N., Henderson, C. R., & KingS., C S., C, 1956. Heritabilities, gene interactions, and correlations associated with certain traits in the domestic fowl. Poult. Sci., 35: 995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, S. C., & Henderson, C. R., 1954. Variance components analysis in heritability studies. Poult. Sci., 33: 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreuger, W. F., Dickerson, G. E., Kinder, Q. B., & Kempster, H. L., 1952. The genetic and environmental relationship of total egg production to its components and to body weight in the fowl. Poult. Sci., 31: 922 (Soc. Proc).Google Scholar
Lerner, I. M., 1950. Population Genetics and Animal Improvement. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, I. M., 1958. The Genetic Basis of Selection. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Lerner, I. M., & Cruden, D., 1951. The heritability of egg weight: the advantages of mass selection and of early measurements. Poult. Sci., 30: 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordskog, A. W., 1960. Importance of egg size and other factors in determining net income in random sample tests. Poult. Sci., 39: 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, R., 1954. Sex-linked association of egg weight and body weight in Brown Leghorns. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin. (B), 65: 317.Google Scholar
Osborne, R., & PatersonW., S. B. W., S. B., 1952. On the sampling variance of heritability estimates derived from variance analyses. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin. (B), 64: 456.Google Scholar
Peeler, R. J., Glazener, E. W., & BLOW, W. L., 1955. The heritability of broiler weight and age at sexual maturity and the genetic and environmental correlations between these traits. Poult. Sci., 34: 420.Google Scholar
Robertson, A., 1959. The sampling variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics, 15: 469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saeki, Y., & Katsuragi, T., 1957. (Several factors affecting egg size, especially interrelationship between egg weight and some economic traits) Bull. nat. Inst. agric. Sci. (Chiba), G, No. 13: 35. (Anim. Breed. Abst., 26, No. 1607).Google Scholar
Siegel, P. B., & Essary, E. O., 1959. Heritabilities and interrelationships of live measurements and eviscerated weight in broilers. Poult. Sci., 38: 530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W., 1956. Statistical Methods. Iowa State College Press, Ames, la.5th ed.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. H., Blow, W. L., Cockerham, C. C., & Glazener, E. W., 1958. The heritability of body weight, gain, feed consumption and feed conversion in broilers. Poult. Sci., 37: 862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, A. J., 1954. Genetic variation and covariation in egg production and other economic traits in chickens. Poult. Sci., 33: 1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar