Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:49:58.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The growth and development of nine European sheep breeds. 1. British breeds: Scottish Blackface, Welsh Mountain and Shetland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

N. C. Friggens ,
M. Shanks ,
I. Kyriazakis ,
J. D. Oldham  and
T. H. McClelland
N. C. Friggens
Affiliation:
Genetics and Behavioural Sciences Department, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
M. Shanks
Affiliation:
Genetics and Behavioural Sciences Department, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
I. Kyriazakis
Affiliation:
Genetics and Behavioural Sciences Department, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
J. D. Oldham
Affiliation:
Genetics and Behavioural Sciences Department, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
T. H. McClelland
Affiliation:
Genetics and Behavioural Sciences Department, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the growth and development of carcass composition of entire male and female lambs of three British hill breeds (Scottish Blackface, Welsh Mountain, and Shetland), from weaning to approaching maturity, when kept under conditions designed to be nutritionally non-limiting. Lambs were weaned at 8 weeks of age and given a high-quality pelleted diet ad libitum until slaughter at one offive different degrees of maturity. The Gompertz growth function was used to characterize, for each genotype, the growth curve and to provide estimates of mature weight. As expected, there were significant effects of breed and sex on both food intake and growth rate. Growth rate was depressed, relative to the Gompertz fit, during the months of October to January, and intake was similarly depressed. The estimates of mature weight for the females of each breed were: Scottish Blackface, 69; Welsh Mountain, 61; Shetland, 46 kg. The mature weights of the males were found to be not significantly different from 1-3 times the mature weight offemales. Relationships between carcass composition and live weight were derived by allometric regression. This study provides the first full description of the growth and meat production potential of the three breeds.

Keywords

breedscarcass compositionfood intakegrowthsheep
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 65 , Issue 3 , December 1997 , pp. 409 - 426
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, England.Google Scholar
Al-Nakib, F. M. S., Findlay, R. H. and Smith, C. 1986 Performance of different Scottish Blackface stocks and their crosses. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107: 119–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Nakib, F. M. S. and King, J. W. B. 1989. The performance of Welsh Mountain ewes and their crosses with a New Zealand Romney in a hill environment. Research and Development in Agriculture 6:139–142.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1980. Official methods of analysis, 13th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Atkins, K. D., 1986. A genetic analysis of the components of lifetime productivity in Scottish Blackface sheep. Animal Production 43: 405–420.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. and Boyne, A. W. 1982. Fasting and maintenance metabolism of sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99:611–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. and Clapperton, J. L. 1965. Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. British Journal of Nutrition 19: 511–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowie, S. H. U. 1987. Shetland's native farm animals. Part two — Shetland sheep. Ark 14:194–199.Google Scholar
Brody, S. 1945. Bioenergetics and growth. Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M., Griffiths, D. A., Thompson, J. M., Zamora, J. and James, A. M. 1983. Changes in body composition relative to weight and maturity in large and small strains of Australian Merino rams. 1. Muscle, bone and fat. Animal Production 36: 29–37.Google Scholar
Buys, N., Peeters, R., De Clerk, B., Van Isterdael, J., Kühn, E. R. and Decuypere, E. 1990. Seasonal variations in prolactin, growth hormone and thyroid hormones and the prolactin surge at ovulation do not affect litter size of ewes during pregnancy in the oestrous or the anoestrous season. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 90:47–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, J. J., Emmans, G. C. and Friggens, N. 1994. Effect of diet on behaviour of individually penned lambs. Animal Production 58: 441(abstr.).Google Scholar
Cropper, M. R. 1987 Growth and development of sheep in relation to feeding strategy. Ph.D. thesis. University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, A., Harrington, G. and Smith, R. J. 1972. Tissue separation — to asses beef and lamb variation. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production 1972, pp. 113–122.Google Scholar
Doney, J. M., Milne, J. A., Maxwell, T. J., Sibbald, A. M. and Smith, A. D. M. 1988. The effects of live weight at weaning on growth rate and carcass composition at different stages of maturity in Scottish Blackface lambs fed on two different diets. Animal Production 47: 401–409.Google Scholar
Elwes, H. J. 1913. Guide to the primitive breeds of sheep and their crosses on exhibition at the Royal Agricultural Society's show, Bristol, with notes on the management of park sheep in England and the possible advantages of crossing them with improved breeds. Republished July 1983 by the Rare Breeds Survival Trust with the support of the Royal Agricultural Society of England.Google Scholar
Emmans, G. C. 1988. Genetic components of potential and actual growth. In Animal breeding opportunities. British Society of Animal Production, occasional publication no. 12, pp. 153–181.Google Scholar
Ferguson, N. S. and Gous, R. M. 1993a. Evaluation of pig genotypes. 1. Theoretical aspects of measuring genetic parameters. Animal Production 56: 233–244.Google Scholar
Ferguson, N. S. and Gous, R. M. 1993b. Evaluation of pig genotypes. 2. Testing experimental procedure. Animal Production 56: 245–250.Google Scholar
Friggens, N., McClelland, T. H., Emmans, G. C., Kyriazakis, I., Scanlan, S. and Shanks, M. 1995. The improvement of the quality and marketability of sheep meat produced in the Less Favoured Areas (LFA) of the Community — Aggregate report — SAC for CAMAR project 8001 CT 91 0308. SAC technical report, GABS Dept, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Gailli, E. S. E. 1993. A comparison of body components of indigenous Saudi sheep breeds related to relative mature size and growth rate. Animal Production 57:113–118.Google Scholar
Goering, H. K. and Van Soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agricultural handbook no. 379. Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Gompertz, B. 1825. On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality and on new modes of determining the value of life contingencies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 115: 513–585.Google Scholar
Gordon, J. G. 1964. The effect of time of year on the roughage intake of housed sheep. Nature, London 204: 798–799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Görgülü, M., Kutlu, H. R., Demir, E., Öztürkcan, O. and Forbes, J. M. 1996. Nutritional consequences among ingredients of free-choice feeding Awassi lambs. Small Ruminant Research 20:23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, R. G. 1970. A note on the effect of broken mouth on the performance of Scottish Blackface hill ewes. Animal Production 12: 517–520.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. 1932. Growth and development of mutton qualities in the sheep. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. G. 1985. Energy status and reproductive performance of a commercial Welsh Mountain ewe flock. Animal Production 40: 566(abstr.).Google Scholar
Huxley, J. 1932. Problems of relative growth, first edition Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Iason, G. R. and Mantecon, A. R. 1991. Seasonal variation in voluntary food intake and post-weaning growth in lambs: a comparison of genotypes. Animal Production 52: 279–285.Google Scholar
Iason, G. R. and Mantecon, A. R. 1993. The effects of dietary protein level during food restriction on carcass and non-carcass components, digestibility and subsequent compensatory growth in lambs. Animal Production 56: 93–100.Google Scholar
Iason, G. R., Mantecon, A. R., Milne, J. A., Sim, D. A., Smith, A. D. M. and White, I. R. 1992. The effect of pattern of food supply on performance, compensatory growth and carcass composition of Beulah and Welsh Mountain lambs. Animal Production 54: 235–241.Google Scholar
Iason, G. R., Sim, D. A., Foreman, E., Fenn, P. and Elston, D. A. 1994. Seasonal variation of voluntary food intake and metabolic rate in three contrasting breeds of sheep. Animal Production 58:381–388.Google Scholar
Kay, R. N. B. 1985. Seasonal variation of appetite in ruminants. In Recent advances in animal nutrition — 1985 (Haresign, W.), pp. 199–210. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Croston, D., Guy, D. R. and Jones, D. W. 1987. Growth and carcass characteristics of crossbred lambs by ten sire breeds, compared at the same carcass subcutaneous fat proportion. Animal Production 44: 83–98.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P., Corbett, J. L., McDonald, I. and Pullar, J. D. 1963. Estimates of the energy required for maintenance in adult sheep. 1. Housed sheep. Animal Production 5:1–10.Google Scholar
Lee, G. J. 1984. A comparison of carcass traits in Scottish Blackface and Welsh Mountain lambs and their crosses. Animal Production 39:433–440.Google Scholar
Lloyd, M., Emmans, G. C. and Prescott, J. H. D. 1985. The effects of nutrition and stage of maturity on the efficiency of lamb growth and carcass quality. Animal Production 40: 522(abstr.).Google Scholar
McClelland, T. H., Bonaiti, B. and Taylor, St C. S. 1976. Breed differences in body composition of equally mature sheep. Animal Production 23: 281–293.Google Scholar
McClelland, T. H. and Russel, A. J. F. 1972. The distribution of body fat in Scottish Blackface and Finnish Landrace lambs. Animal Production 15: 301–306.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1989a. Instructions for the assessment, photography, jointing, retail cutting and tissue separation of lamb carcasses. Meat and Livestock Commission, Milton Keynes, UK.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1989b. Lamb carcass production — planning to meet your market, second edition. Meat and Livestock Commission, Milton Keynes, UK.Google Scholar
Milne, J. A., MacRae, J. C., Spence, A. M. and Wilson, S. 1978. A comparison of the voluntary intake and digestion of a range of forages at different times of the year by the sheep and the red deer (Cervus elaphus). British Journal of Nutrition 40: 347–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pálsson, H. 1939. Meat qualities in sheep with special reference to the Scottish breeds and crosses. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 29: 544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, J. R. 1982. A theory offeeding and growth of animals. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, R. R., Chapin, L. T., Emery, R. S. and Tucker, H. A. 1980. Growth and hormonal response of heifers to various photoperiods. Journal of Animal Science, Cambridge 51: 1148–1153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Read, J. L. 1964. Crossbreeding and hill sheep. Animal Breeding Research Organisation report — 1964. Agricultural Research Council, UK, pp. 25–32.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. B. and Van Soest, P. J. 1977. Dietary fiber estimation in concentrate animal feedstuffs. 69th meeting of the American Society of Animal Science. Journal of Animal Science 54: (supplement 1) 254–255.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. F. 1961. Comparison of Blackface and Cheviot breed types. Hill Farming Research Organisation, second report, 1958-1961, Edinburgh, UK, pp. 28–30.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Gunn, R. G. and Doney, J. M. 1968a. Components of weight loss in pregnant hill ewes. Animal Production 10:43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Gunn, R. G., Skedd, E. and Doney, J. M. 1968b. Relationships between chemical and physical composition of Scottish Blackface ewes. Animal Production 10: 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schanbacher, B. D. and Crouse, J. D. 1980. Growth and performance of growing-finishing lambs exposed to long and short photoperiods. Journal of Animal Science 51: 943–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steane, D. E. 1983. The significance of interactions in practical sheep breeding in Northern Europe. Livestock Production Science 10: 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. and Murray, J. I. 1987. Genetic aspects of mammalian survival and growth in relation to body size. In The nutrition of herbivores (ed. Hacker, J. B. and Ternouth, J. H.), pp. 487–533. Academic Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S., Murray, J. I. and Thonney, M. L. 1989a. Breed and sex differences among equally mature sheep and goats. 4. Carcass muscle, fat and bone. Animal Production 49: 385–409.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S., Murray, J. I. and Thonney, M. L. 1989b. Breed and sex differences among equally mature sheep and goats. 5. Lipid in dry tissue. Animal Production 49: 411–422.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S., Murray, J. I. and Thonney, M. L. 1989c. Breed and sex differences among equally mature sheep and goats. 6. Breed correlations for body composition and food conversion efficiency. Animal Production 49:423–434.Google Scholar
Thomson, W. and Aitken, F. C. 1959. Diet in relation to reproduction and the viability of the young. II. Sheep: world survey of reproduction and review of feeding experiments. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, Buckinghamshire, UK.Google Scholar
Thonney, M. L., Taylor, St C. S. and McClelland, T. H. 1987a. Breed and sex differences in equally mature sheep and goats. 1. Growth and food intake. Animal Production 45: 239–260.Google Scholar
Thonney, M. L., Taylor, St C. S., Murray, J. I. and McClelland, T. H. 1987b. Breed and sex differences in equally mature sheep and goats. 2. Body components at slaughter. Animal Production 45: 261–276.Google Scholar
Thonney, M. L., Taylor, St C. S., Murray, J. I. and McClelland, T. H. 1987c. Breed and sex differences in equally mature sheep and goats. 3. Muscle weight distribution. Animal Production 45:277–290.Google Scholar
Tribe, D. E. 1949. Some seasonal observations on the grazing habits of sheep. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 17:105–115.Google Scholar
Vipond, J. E., Clark, C. F. S., Peck, D. N. and King, M. E. 1987. The effect of ewe size on efficiency of lowland lamb production and the consequences of fulfilling local demand for ewe replacements in North Eastern Scotland from crosses derived from small Shetland ewes through a stratified breeding system. Research and Development Agriculture 4:13–19.Google Scholar
Wiener, G. 1967. A comparison of the body size, fleece weight and maternal performance of five breeds of sheep kept in one environment. Animal Production 9:177–196.Google Scholar
Wiener, G. and Hayter, S. 1974. Body size and conformation in sheep from birth to maturity as affected by breed, crossbreeding, maternal and other factors. Animal Production 19: 47–66.Google Scholar
Wiener, G., Lee, G. J. and Woolliams, J. A. 1992. Effects of rapid inbreeding and of crossing of inbred lines on the body weight growth of sheep. Animal Production 55: 89–99.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. M. 1976. Voluntary food intake studies with six genotypes of sheep. Ph.D. thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Zygoyiannis, D., Stamataris, C., Friggens, N. C., Doney, J. M. and Emmans, G. C. 1997. Estimation of the mature weight of three breeds of Greek sheep using condition scoring corrected for the effect of age. Animal Science 64: 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar