Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:30:50.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and carcass traits of bulls and veal calves of continental cattle breeds 2. Carcass composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. El-Hakim ,
H. Eichinger  and
F. Pirchner
A. El-Hakim
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Technical University of Munich, Freising-Weihenstephan, West Germany
H. Eichinger
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Technical University of Munich, Freising-Weihenstephan, West Germany
F. Pirchner
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Technical University of Munich, Freising-Weihenstephan, West Germany
Get access

Abstract

Sibs of five to 11 twin pairs each of five breeds were either slaughtered as veal or as yearling bulls. Highly significant breed differences were evident in the carcass tissue proportions which could be explained on the basis of differences in the physiology of dairy and dual-purpose animals, the former depositing more fat and more bone than dual-purpose breeds. Among the dual-purpose breeds the carcasses of the Pinzgauer (Pi) tended to rank between the carcasses of the Fleckvieh (FV), Braunvieh (BV), Grauvieh (GV) and those of the Friesian (Fr).

The dual-purpose breeds FV, BV, GV had more meat in the hindquarter and in the shoulder than the FR while these in turn had more meat in the brisket and in the flank and shank muscles. Again the Pi group tended to rank between the aforementioned groups.

Within breeds, large differences between twin pairs indicated high heritabilities for carcass tissue proportions and ratios. The heritability of commercial cut proportions was fairly high but the genetic variance was small, the genetic coefficient of variation being less than 0-02. The different degrees of sexual maturity and of carcass maturity also caused differences in the distribution of meat in the carcasses of young male animals.

Significant mean squares for interactions between treatments and breeds, and genetic correlations of less than unity between performance of twin genotypes in veal and in bulls, indicated age and/or rearing system by genotype interactions between and within breeds for various slaughter traits.

Phenotypic correlations between various slaughter traits were low except where part-whole relationships were involved. It is suggested that slaughter at comparable maturity in the respective treatments was the cause of the weak connection between the traits.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , October 1986 , pp. 235 - 243
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, B. B. 1978. Animal size and efficiency, with special reference to growth and feed conversion in cattle. Animal Production 27: 381–391.Google Scholar
Andersen, B. B., Liboriussen, T., Kousgaard, K. and Buchter, L. 1977. Crossbreeding experiment with beef and dual-purpose sire breeds on Danish dairy cows. III. Daily gain, feed conversion and carcass quality of intensely fed young bulls. Livestock Production Science 4: 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batra, T. R., Usborne, W. R., Grieve, D. G. and Burnside, E. B. 1973. Genotype-environment interaction in calf production. II. Live measurements and carcass traits. Journal of Animal Science 36: 471–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, R. T., Andersen, B. B. And Liboriussen, T. 1978a. Growth of bovine tissues. 1. Genetic influences on growth patterns of muscle, fat and bone in young bulls. Animal Production 26: 245–258.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T., Andersen, B. B. and Liboriusshn, T. 1978b. Growth of bovine tissues. 2. Genetic influences on muscle growth and distribution in young bulls. Animal Production 27: 51–61.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T. and Butterfield, R. M. 1976. New Concepts of Cattle Growth. University of Sydney Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Brabander, D. L. De, Boucque, C. V., Casteels, M., Aerts, J. V. and Buysse, F. X. 1982. Ability of Holstein- Friesian, Dutch Black and White, and Belgian White-Red bull calves for veal and beef production. In Beef Production from Different Dairy Breeds and Dairy Beef Crosses (ed. O'Ferral, G. J. More), pp. 53–67. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brannang, E. 1971. Studies on monozygous cattle twins. XXIII. The effect of castration and age of castration on the development of single muscles, bones and special sex characters. Part II. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 1: 69–78.Google Scholar
Daenicke, R. and Rohr, K. 1978. Influence of nutrition on body composition and carcass quality of fattening bulls of different breeds (German Friesian and Simmental). In Patterns of Growth and Development in Cattle (ed. Boer, H. De and Martin, J.), pp. 423–433. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dieckmann, W.-D. 1971. Schlachtkörperzusammensetzung, Fleischbeschaffenheit und Nährwert des Fleisches von Jungbullen und Kühen in Abhängigkeit von Endmasse, Alter und täglicher Nettozunahme. Dissertation, Akademie für Landwirtschaftlichs Wissenschaftern, Berlin.Google Scholar
Geay, Y. and Robelin, J. 1979. Variation of meat production capacity in cattle due to genotype and level of feeding: genotype-nutrition interaction. Livestock Production Science 6: 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harder, M., Leuenberger, H. and Hagger, CH. 1981. [Results of commercial crossbreeding experiments in 1978-1980 with heifers of different breeds. 2. Carcass quality.] Schweizerische Landwirtschaftliche Monatschefte 59: 66–75.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cook, G. L. and Southgate, J. R. 1982. A comparison of the progeny of British Friesian dams and different sire breeds in 16- and 24-month beef production systems. 2. Carcass characteristics, and rate and efficiency of meat gain. Animal Production 34: 167–178.Google Scholar
Khalil, H. and Pirchner, F. 1986. Growth and carcass traits of bulls and veal calves of continental cattle breeds. 1. Growth and food efficiency. Animal Production 43:225–233.Google Scholar
Kogel, S., Alps, H., Mittelstadt, W. And Eckhard, H. 1978. [Fattening performance and carcass characters of Brown Swiss×German Brown crossbreds in comparison with German Browns. 2. Results of fattening tests of young bulls.] Sayerisches Landwirtschaftliches Jahrbuch 55: 833–842.Google Scholar
Langholz, H. J. and Jongeling, C. 1972. [A genetic evaluation of progeny testing stations for fattening performance and carcass value in cattle.] Zuchtungskunde 44: 368–384.Google Scholar
Lenschow, J., Stunz, H. and Otto, E. 1968. Jungbullenmast auf hohe Endgewichte. Tierzucht 22: 310–313.Google Scholar
Liboriussen, T. 1982. Sire breed influence of various beef breeds on calving performance, growth rate, feed efficiency, carcass and meat quality. In Beef Production from Different Dairy Breeds and Dairy Beef Crosses (ed. O'Ferral, G. J. More), pp. 82–93. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldenbroek, J. K. 1982. Meat production of Holstein Friesians in comparison to Dutch Friesians and Dutch Red and White. In Beef Production from Different Dairy Breeds and Dairy Beef Crosses (ed. O'Ferral, G. J. More), pp. 45–52. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirchner, F., Mayrhofer, G. and Haas, J. 1972. Interaktion genotyp×mastmethode bei mast- und Schlachteigenschaften von rindern. Annales de Genetique et de Selection Animale 4: 136–137 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Rutzmoser, K. 1977. [Genetic correlation between efficiency of milk and meat production by Bavarian Fleckvieh.] Dissertation, Technical University of Munich, Weihenstephan.Google Scholar
Schon, L. 1961. Schlachttierbeurteilung — Schlachtkorperbewertung. Arbeiten der DLG. Band 25. Deutsche Landwirtschaftsgesellschaft Verlag.Google Scholar
Sperling, G., Beckert, H.-G. and Liebenberg, O. 1974. [Fattening performance and slaughter characters of young German Black Pied fattening bulls maintained under commercial conditions to high final weights. 2. Carcass characters.] Archiv fiir Tierzucht 17: 31–49.Google Scholar
Trappmann, W. 1972. [Estimation of phenotypic and genetic parameters of meat production in young bulls under station and field tesing.] Zuchtungskunde 44: 17–28.Google Scholar