Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T03:58:15.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic size-scaling rules in animal growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. S. Taylor
C. S. Taylor
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
Get access

Abstract

Striking similarities are known to exist in the growth processes of different mammalian genotypes. Two genetic size-scaling rules formally summarize these well-established similarities. In consequence, experimental results in one breed or species can often provide an excellent quantitative guide to biological relationships in other species. Despite strong genetic similarity, much genetic diversity usually remains.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 1980 , pp. 161 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaxter, K. L. 1968. The effect of dietary energy supply on growth. In Growth and Development of Mammals (ed. Lodge, G. A. and Lamming, G. E.), pp. 329–344. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Brody, S. 1945. Bioenergetics and Growth. Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
Clark, A. J. 1927. Comparative Physiology of the Heart. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Evans, Elizabeth and Miller, D. S. 1968. Comparative nutrition, growth and longevity. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 27: 121–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunther, B. and Guerra, E. 1955. Biological similarities. Ada physiol. latinoam. 5: 169–186.Google ScholarPubMed
Kleiber, M. 1961. The Fire of Life. Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Linzell, J. L. 1972. Milk yield, energy loss in milk, and mammary gland weight in different species. Dairy Sci. Abstr. 34: 351–360.Google Scholar
Stahl, W. R. 1967. Scaling of respiratory variables in mammals. J. appl. Physiol. 22: 453–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, St C. S. 1965. A relation between mature weight and time taken to mature in mammals. Anim. Prod. 7: 203–220.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. 1968. Time taken to mature in relation to mature weight for sexes, strains and species of domesticated mammals and birds. Anim. Prod. 10: 157–169.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. 1970. Models of maintenance requirements in livestock. In The Use of Models in Agricultural and Biological Research (ed. Jones, J. W. G.), pp. 107–117. Grassland Research Institue, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. 1973. Genetic differences in milk production in relation to mature body weight. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Series) 2: 15–26.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. 1980. Live-weight growth from embryo to adult in domesticated mammals. Anim. Prod. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar