Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:21:58.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic parameters for osteochondrosis traits in elbow joints of crossbred pigs and relationships with production traits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

B. Jørgensen  and
B. Nielsen
B. Jørgensen*
Affiliation:
Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Foulum, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
B. Nielsen
Affiliation:
National Committee for Pig Production, Axelborg, Axeltorv 3, DK-1609 Copenhagen V, Denmark
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A total of 9360 offspring of 12 purebred Duroc sires and 692 Landrace × Yorkshire sows were evaluated for six osteochondrosis traits in the left elbow joints at slaughter. Osteochondrosis traits, growth pre- and post weaning, and meat content at slaughter were analysed simultaneously by a multivariate genetic model. Castrates scored worse than female pigs for nearly all osteochondral traits. Heritability of elbow osteochondrosis was moderate (0·02 to 0·28) and, thus, selection against the disorder is possible. Phenotypic correlations among joint surface abnormalities, cartilage thickness, subchondral lesions and cracks in the cartilage at the osteochondral junction in the medial condyle ranged from 0·33 to 0·69, whereas genetic correlations ranged from 0·75 to 0·97. Phenotypic correlations of the sagittal central groove with other abnormalities in the medial condyle were low and insignificant but genetic correlations were strongly significant (0·66 to 0·77). Depression of the proximal edge of the radius was to some extent phenotypically correlated to abnormalities in the medial humeral condyle (around 0·2), while genetic correlations ranged from 0·05 to 0·52. Significant genetic correlations among osteochondral traits indicate that all are part of the osteochondrosis complex. Abnormalities in the joint surface showed the strongest genetic correlations with other osteochondrosis variables in the elbow joint and were moderately inherited (h2 = 0·22), which indicates that this trait can be used as a marker to select against osteochondrosis. Osteochondral traits had no significant genetic correlations with growth to weaning and to 30 kg, slight negative (favourable) genetic correlations with growth from 30 to 100 kg, and slightly positive (unfavourable) genetic correlations with meat content in carcass.

Keywords

genetic parametersgrowth ratemeat yieldosteochondritispigs
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , December 2005 , pp. 319 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Empel, W. and Sehested, E. 1986. Qualitative, semiquantitative and quantitative diagnosis of osteochondrosis in pigs by computed tomography (CT). Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica 36: 186–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Empel, W., Walach-Janiak, M. and Fandrejewski, H. 1980. Influence of intensity of feeding and protein body content on the incidence of osteochondrosis in six month old pigs. Annals of Warsaw Agricultural University, Veterinary Medicine 10: 39–43.Google Scholar
Fredeen, H. T. and Sather, A. P. 1978. Joint damage in pigs reared under confinement. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 58: 759–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goedegebuure, S. A., Rothschild, M. F., Christian, L. L. and Ross, R. F. 1988. Severity of osteochondrosis in three genetic lines of Duroc swine divergently selected for front leg-weakness. Livestock Production Science 19: 487–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grøndalen, T. 1974a. Osteochondrosis and arthrosis in pigs. I. Incidence in animals up to 120 kg liveweight. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 15: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grøndalen, T. and Vangen, O. 1974. Osteochondrosis and arthrosis in pigs. V. A comparison of the incidence in three different lines of the Norwegian Landrace breed. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 15: 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häni, H., Schwörer, D. and Blum, J. K. 1984. Osteochondrosis (OC) in performance-tested pigs: incidence in Swiss Landrace (SLR) and Swiss Large White (SLW) breeds, relationship to carcass characteristics, performance traits and leg weakness. Proceedings of the eighth international Pig Veterinary Society congressGhent, p. 266.Google Scholar
Häni, H., Troxler, J. and Würsten, B. 1983. [In.uence of housing on the incidence and severity of osteochondrosis in fattening pigs: open front stables on deep straw bedding and partly slatted floor.] Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde 125: 453–475.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, B. 1995. Effect of different energy and protein levels on leg weakness and osteochondrosis in pigs. Livestock Production Science 41: 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, B. 2000. Osteochondrosis/osteoarthrosis and claw disorders in sows, associated with leg weakness. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 41: 123–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jørgensen, B. 2003. Influence of floor type and stocking density on leg weakness, osteochondrosis and claw disorders in slaughter pigs. Animal Science 77: 439–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, B. and Andersen, S. 2000. Genetic parameters for osteochondrosis in Danish Landrace and Yorkshire boars and correlations with leg weakness and production traits. Animal Science 71: 427–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, B., Arnbjerg, J. and Aaslyng, M. 1995. Pathological and radiological investigations on osteochondrosis in pigs, associated with leg weakness. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series A-Physiology, Pathology and Clinical Medicine 42: 489–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kadarmideen, H. N., Schwörer, D., Ilahi, H., Malek, M. and Hofer, A. 2004. Genetics of osteochondral disease and its relationship with meat quality and quantity, growth, and feed conversion traits in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 82: 3118–3127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kincaid, S. A. and Lidvall, E. R. 1983. Observations on the postnatal morphogenesis of the porcine humeral condyle and the pathogenesis of osteochondrosis. American Journal of Veterinary Research 44: 2095–2103.Google Scholar
Lundeheim, N. 1987. Genetic analysis of osteochondrosis and leg weakness in the Swedish pig progeny testing scheme. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica 37: 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundeheim, N. and Rydhmer, L. 1990. Genetic analysis of osteochondrosis and leg weakness in the Swedish Landrace pig population. Proceedings of the fourth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Edinburgh, vol. XV, pp. 493–496.Google Scholar
Nakano, T., Aherne, F. X., Brennan, J. J. and Thompson, J. R. 1984. Effect of growth rate on the incidence of osteochondrosis in growing swine. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 64: 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakano, T., Aherne, F. X. and Thompson, J. R. 1979. Effects of feed restriction, sex and diethylstilbestrol on the occurence of joint lesions with some histological and biochemical studies of the articular cartilage of growing-finishing swine. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 59: 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakano, T., Aherne, F. X. and Thompson, J. R. 1981. Leg weakness and osteochondrosis in pigs. Pig News and Information 2: 29–34.Google Scholar
Nakano, T., Brennan, J. J. and Aherne, F. X. 1987. Leg weakness and osteochondrosis in swine: a review. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 67: 883–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumaier, A. and Groeneveld, E. 1998. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of covariances in sparse linear models. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 30: 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, S.-E. and Reiland, S. 1978. The nature of osteochondrosis in animals. Summary and conclusions with comparative aspects on osteochondritis dissecans in man. Acta Radiologica 358: (suppl.) 299–306.Google ScholarPubMed
Reiland, S. 1978a. Morphology of osteochondrosis and sequelae in pigs. Acta Radiologica 358: (suppl.) 45–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Reiland, S. 1978b. Pathology of so-called leg weakness in the pig. Acta Radiologica 358: (suppl.) 23–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Reiland, S., Ordell, N., Lundeheim, N. and Olsson, S.-E. 1978. Heredity of osteochondrosis, body constitution and leg weakness in the pig. Acta Radiologica 358: (suppl.) 123–137.Google ScholarPubMed
Sather, A. P. and Fredeen, H. T. 1982. The effect of confinement housing upon the incidence of leg weakness in swine. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 62: 1119–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1999. SAS/STATTM user's guide, version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Stern, S., Lundeheim, N., Johansson, K. and Andersson, K. 1995. Osteochondrosis and leg weakness in pigs selected for lean tissue growth rate. Livestock Production Science 44: 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wal, P. G. v. d., Valk, P. C. v. d., Goedegebuure, S. A. and Essen, G. v. 1983. Do gilts and barrows react similarly with respect to leg weakness and osteochondrosis? Veterinary Quarterly 5: 175–177.Google ScholarPubMed
Wegener, K. M., Heje, N.-I., Aarestrup, F. M., Ravn, B. T. and østerby, J. 1993. The morphology of synovial grooves (fossa synoviales) in joints of cattle of different age groups. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series A-Physiology, Pathology and Clinical Medicine 40: 359–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ytrehus, B., Grindflek, E., Teige, J., Stubsjøen, E., Grøndalen, T., Carlson, C. S. and Ekman, S. 2004. The effect of parentage on the prevalence, severity and location of lesions of osteochondrosis in swine. Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series A-Physiology, Pathology and Clinical Medicine 51: 188–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed