Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:53:58.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic and phenotypic parameters in performance-tested pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. R. Walters ,
M. K. Curran  and
P. A. Kentish
J. R. Walters
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of London, Ashford, Kent TN25 5AH
M. K. Curran
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of London, Ashford, Kent TN25 5AH
P. A. Kentish
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of London, Ashford, Kent TN25 5AH
Get access

Summary

Data were available from 11 474 gilts performance-tested on 137 farms. The data were analysed to provide pooled within-farm sire component estimates of h2 and genetic correlations.

Estimates of h2 of 0·43 ± 0·10, 0·44 + 0·09 and 0·49 ±009 were obtained for weight for age, C + K and shoulder fat depths respectively in 3583 gilts in 49 Large White herds. Comparable Landrace values derived from 2810 gilts in 43 herds were 0·44 + 0·11, 0·40 ±0·10 and 0·51 ±0·12 respectively. Estimates were consistent from herd to herd.

Estimates of h2 made on data from 5081 crossbred pigs, of mainly Large White and Landrace parentage, varied with herd from 0·10 to 0·40 for weight for age and from 0·08 to 0·96 for shoulder fat depth. Significant differences between breeds were found for the genetic correlations between weight for age and the fat depths, and between shoulder and mid-backfat depths. The variance was partitioned into various components. For index score, the within-herd variance averaged 73% of the total variance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , October 1977 , pp. 225 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Becker, W. A. 1967. Manual of Procedures in Quantitative Genetics, 2nd ed. Washington State University Press, Pullman, Washington.Google Scholar
Curran, M. K. 1972. Results from the British on-farm testing scheme run by the Meat and Livestock Commission. Proc. Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. 23rdMtg, Pig Study Commission, Verona, Italy, 1972.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. 1964. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Fredeen, H. T. 1969. Effective performance recording in swine. Proc. 2nd Wld Conf. Anim. Prod., College Park, Maryland, 1968, pp. 175–180.Google Scholar
Gerlach, J. 1970. [Ultrasonic measurements as an aid to estimating breeding value in the pig. 4. Studies on the selection of breeding sows with special reference to performance testing on breeders' farms.] Z. Tierzücht ZüchtBiol. 86: 325–348.Google Scholar
Hofstra, B. U. and Minkema, D., 1972. Field testing of young breeding pigs. II. The accuracy of field testing. Proc. Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. 23rd Mtg, Pig Study Commission, Verona, Italy, 1972.Google Scholar
Horst, P. 1971. Ultrasonic and X-ray measuring techniques in pig performance tests. 1. The ultrasonic technique. Z. Tierziicht. ZiichtBiol. 88: 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalm, E. and Glodek, P. 1972. [Problems with within-herd selection indices for gilts in West Germany.] Proc. Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. 23rd Mtg, Pig Study Commission, Verona, Italy, 1972.Google Scholar
Rittler, A. 1966. [The use of ultrasonics as an aid to estimating the breeding value of young boars.] Züchtungskunde, 38: 11–22.Google Scholar
Rittler, A. 1968. [Ultrasonic measurement as an aid to estimating breeding value in the pig. 2. Further studies on the genetic basis of ultrasonic measurements on young boars. ] Z. Tierzücht. ZzüchtBiol. 84: 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. 1959. The sampling variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics 15: 469–485.Google Scholar
Smith, C., King, J. W. B. and Gilbert, N. 1962. Genetic parameters of British Large White bacon pigs. Anim. Prod. 4: 128–143.Google Scholar
Smith, C. and Ross, G. J. S. 1965. Genetic parameters of British Landrace bacon pigs, Anim. Prod. 7: 291–301.Google Scholar
Smith, D. H. and Steane, D. E. 1971. British experience of on-farm testing. Proc, Conf. Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod., Versailles, France, 1971.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1967. Statistical Methods. 6th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Standal, N. 1970. On-the-farm testing of pigs in Norway. Proc. Conf. Pigs—Progress and Potential. Brighton, 1970. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley, Bucks.Google Scholar
Standal, N. and Moen, R. A. 1971. Combining information from test stations and farms when estimating the breeding value of boars. Proc. Conf. Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod., Versailles, France, 1971.Google Scholar
Walters, J. R. 1974. Genetic parameters and environmental variation in pigs—with special reference to performance testing in farm conditions. M.Phil. Thesis, Univ. London.Google Scholar