Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:11:07.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A genetic analysis of body weight traits in young Bauscat and Giza White rabbits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. H. Khalil
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture at Moshtohor, Zagazig University, Banha Branch, Egypt
E. A. Afifi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture at Moshtohor, Zagazig University, Banha Branch, Egypt
J. B. Owen
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of North Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW
Get access

Abstract

The effects of various genetic and environmental factors on body-weight traits were studied in 3051 records of Bauscat (B) and Giza White (G) rabbits in the period from October 1976 to September 1983. Sixty-five sires and 289 dams were used for analysis of data of body weight at 6 weeks and bi-weekly up to 12 weeks of age. Year and month of birth exerted a pronounced effect on body weights of rabbits. Sex differences on the other hand were small at all ages studied and no pattern of parity effects was observed. Effects of litter size at birth were significant for 6-week weight but not for weights taken at later post-weaning ages. Body weights at the four ages studied decreased as litter size at weaning increased. Litter-weight effects on body weights decreased significantly as the age of the rabbit advanced. Sire and dam affected significantly most of the body-weight traits studied. The proportion of variance attributable to both sire and dam components for all body weights studied in G rabbits were generally larger than those in B rabbits. Heritabilities from sire and dam components of variance for body weights n i B rabbits were substantially lower than the corresponding estimates in G rabbits. Genetic and phenotypic correlations among body weights at all ages studied were positive and of moderate or high magnitude, and tended to decrease in value as the differences between the two ages increased.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blasco, A., Balsega, M. and Garcia, F. 1983. [Analysis of productive characters in meat production rabbits. I. Growth characters.] Archivos de Zootecnia 32: (123), 118.Google Scholar
Bogdan, S. D. 1970. The heritability of live weight in rabbits. Animal Breeding Abstracts 40: 134 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Carregal, R. D. 1980. [Evaluation of heterosis, combining ability and maternal and reciprocal mating effects in rabbits.] 2nd World Rabbit Congress, Barcelona, pp. 213220. Annales de Génétique et de Sélection Animale 12: 297 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
El-Amin, F. M. 1974. A selection experiment for improvement of weight gains and feed conversion efficiency in rabbits. Ph.D. Thesis, Bristol University.Google Scholar
Emara, M. E. A. 1982. Effect of crossbreeding on some productive traits in rabbits. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Moshtohor, Zagazig University, Egypt.Google Scholar
Ghany, M. A., Badreldin, A. L., Shafie, M. M. and Hanafi, M. 1961. Some factors affecting body weight i n Giza rabbits. Journal of Animal Production United Arab Republics 1: 121134.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1977. User's guide for LSML76. Mixed model least-squares and maximum likelihood computer program. Ohio State University, Columbus. (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Henderson, C. R. 1953. Estimation of variance and covariance components. Biometrics 9: 226252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdas, S. and Szendro, Z. 1982. Milk production of rabbits. Hungarian Agricultural Review 32: 95100.Google Scholar
Khalil, M. H., Owen, J. B. and Afifi, E. A. 1987. A genetic analysis of litter traits in Bauscat and Giza White rabbits. Animal Production 45: 123133.Google Scholar
Lebas, F. and Matheron, G. 1982. Livestock production in Europe. Perspectives and prospects. VIII. Rabbits. Livestock Production Science 9: 235250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukefahr, S. 1982. Evaluation of rabbit breeds and crosses for overall commercial productivity. Ph.D. Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA.Google Scholar
McReynolds, W. E. 1974. Genetic parameters of early growth in a population of New Zealand White rabbits. Ph.D. Thesis, Ohio State University, Corvallis, USA.Google Scholar
Mgheni, M., Christensen, K. and Kyomo, M. L. 1982. Selection experiment on growth and litter size in rabbits. I. Effect of litter size and growth. Tropical Animal Production 7: 217225.Google Scholar
Mostageer, A., Ghany, M. A. and Darwish, H. I. 1970. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for the improvement of body weight in Giza rabbits. Journal of Animal Production United Arab Republic 10: 6572.Google Scholar
Niedzwiadek, S. 1978. The Evaluation of Slaughter Value and Its Application in the Selection of Rabbits. Institute of Zootechnology, Krakow, Poland.Google Scholar
Nossier, F. M. 1970. A study on some economical characteristics in some local and foreign breeds of rabbits. M.Sci. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Egypt.Google Scholar
Randi, E. and Scossiroli, R. E. 1980. Genetic analysis of production traits in Italian New Zealand White and California pure-bred populations. 2nd World Rabbit Congress, Barcelona. Annales de Génétique et de Sélection Animale 12: 296 (Abstr.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swiger, L. A., Harvey, W. R., Everson, D. O. and Gregory, K. E. 1964. The variance of intra-class correlation involving groups with one observation. Biometrics 20: 818826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talus, G. M. 1959. Sampling errors of genetic correlation coefficients calculated from analysis of variance and covariance. Australian Journal of Statistics 1: 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valderrama de diaz, G. and Varela-alvarez, H. 1975. [Genetic study on the improvement of some production characters in rabbits.] Agrociencia No. 21, pp. 115124.Google Scholar