Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T18:19:37.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gastro-intestinal re-entrant cannulae for studies of digestion in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1962

R. W. Ash
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
Get access

Extract

The design and manufacture of plastic cannulae are described and the chief hazards associated with cannulated re-entrant fistulae in sheep are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ash, R. W., 1961a. Acid secretion by the abomasum and its relation to the flow of food material in sheep. J. Physiol, 156: 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ash, R. W., 1961b. Stimuli influencing the secretion of acid by the abomasum of sheep. J. Physiol., 157: 185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dougherty, R. W., 1955. Permanent stomach and intestinal fistulas in ruminants: some modifications and simplifications. Cornell Vet., 45: 331.Google ScholarPubMed
Goodall, E., & Kay, R. N. B., 1962. Digestion and absorption in the large intestine of the sheep. XXII Int. physiol. Congr. Leiden. (Proceedings in press.)Google Scholar
Harris, L. E., & Phillipson, A. T., 1962. The measurements of the flow of food to the duodenum of sheep. Anim. Prod., 4: 97.Google Scholar
Hogan, J. P., & Phillipson, A. T., 1960. The rate of flow of digesta and their removal along the digestive tract of sheep. Brit. J. Nutr., 14: 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, A. T., 1952. The passage of digesta from the abomasum of sheep. J. Physiol., 116: 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singleton, A. G., 1961. The electromagnetic measurement of the flow of digesta through the duodenum of the goat and sheep. J. Physiol., 155: 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar