Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:38:19.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Freeze-branding of young beef animals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

Norman Day ,
D. McEwan Jenkinson  and
J. Walker-Love
Norman Day
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, The West of Scotland Agricultural College, Ayr and Department of Physiology, Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
D. McEwan Jenkinson
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, The West of Scotland Agricultural College, Ayr and Department of Physiology, Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
J. Walker-Love
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, The West of Scotland Agricultural College, Ayr and Department of Physiology, Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
Get access

Summary

The effects of freeze-branding young beef animals using two coolants were investigated and an attempt was made to avoid hide damage.

1. Branding with irons cooled in liquid nitrogen gave good markings but resulted in severe hide damage.

2. CO2-branding caused much less hide damage but gave fewer legible brands.

3. Legible brands with both coolants always resulted in some marking of the hide.

4. Branding on the jaw provided a satisfactory means of identification without loss of hide value.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , February 1971 , pp. 93 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dowling, D. A. and Nay, T. 1960. Cyclic changes in the follicle and hair coat in cattle. Aust.J. agric. Res. 11: 1064–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, A. L., Naghski, J., Farrell, R. K. and Winward, L. D. 1968. Microscopic study of leather defects. III. Structural changes induced by freeze-branding. J. Am. Leath. Chem. Ass. 63: 614–630Google Scholar
Farrell, R. K., Koger, L. M. and Winward, L. D. 1966. Freeze-branding of cattle, dogs and cats for identification. J. Amer. vet. med. Ass. 149: 745–752.Google ScholarPubMed
Findlay, J. D. and Jenkinson, D. McEwan. 1960. The morphology of bovine sweat glands and the effect of heat on the sweat glands of the Ayrshire calf. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 55: 247–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkinson, D. McEwan and Nay, T. 1968. Sweat gland and hair follicle measurements as indicators of skin type in cattle. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 21: 1001–1011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyne, A. G., Hollis, D. E., Chase, H. B. and Hayman, R. H. 1967. Changes experimentally produced in the pigmentation of the skin and coat of sheep. Aust. J. Sci. 30: 30–31Google Scholar
McFetridge, D. G. and Rollinson, D. H. L. 1968. Identifying animals by freeze-branding.Vet. Rec. 83: 178.Google Scholar
Michail, G. R. 1963. Hair neogenesis in rat skin. Archs Derm. 88: 713–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A. C. 1949. Survival of rat skin following freezing. J. exp. Zool. 110: 77–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed