Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:31:25.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Food intake, growth and body composition in Australian Merino sheep selected for high and low weaning weight. 1. Food intake, food efficiency and growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. M. Thompson ,
J. R. Parks  and
Diana Perry
J. M. Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Anatomy, University of Sydney, 2006, NSW, Australia
J. R. Parks
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Sydney, 2006, NSW, Australia
Diana Perry
Affiliation:
NSW Department of Agriculture, Trangie, 2823, NSW, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Changes in the pattern of food intake, food conversion efficiency and growth from weaning to maturity, were examined in 35 rams and ewes from flocks of Merino sheep selected for high (weight-plus) and low (weight-minus) weaning weight and from a randomly bred control flock. The sheep were individually fed a pelleted ration ad libitum for at least 72 weeks and up to 90 weeks post weaning. Weekly food intake was described as an increasing exponential function of age with a linearly declining asymptote, about which a regular oscillation occurred, and weekly body-weight gain was described as an increasing exponential function of weekly food intake, about which a regular oscillation also occurred.

The oscillations in weekly food intake had a period of about 52 weeks and appeared to be largely associated with seasonal variations in temperature, with an increased food intake during winter and a decreased food intake during summer. The oscillations in both the food-intake and body-weight functions were of similar phase and period and it was suggested that the body-weight oscillations were due to variation in gut-fill, a result of the seasonal oscillations in food intake.

Selection for weaning weight changed the shape and magnitude of the food-intake curve, with the weight-plus having a greater rate of food intake (i.e. appetite) in the early stages of growth and a greater asymptote than the weight-minus animals. Selection for high and low weaning weight also resulted in an increase and a decrease in mature weight. Both strains had a similar growth efficiency, although when calculated as gross food conversion efficiency the weight-plus were higher than the weight-minus animals at the same body weight, whereas there was no difference between strains at the same age.

The rams had both a higher asymptote and a slower rate of decline in food intake than the ewes. Rams had a higher mature weight than the ewes, although ewes had a slightly greater growth efficiency. However, when calculated as gross food conversion efficiency, ewes tended to be lower than rams, when compared either at the same age, or at the same body weight.

When the food-intake curves were standardized for differences in mature size, strain differences in the magnitude of the food-intake curves were reduced, although differences in the shape were still apparent. Shape differences in the food-intake curves were reflected in the shape of the standardized growth curves, with the weight-plus maturing at a faster rate than the weight-minus animals. There was little difference between the sexes in the initial shape of the food-intake curve, although at later ages ewes had a lower food intake than rams. There was little difference between the sexes in the shape of the standardized growth curves.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 55 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaxter, K. L., Fowler, V. R. and Gill, J. C. 1982. A study of the growth of sheep to maturity. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 98: 405–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. A. and Frahm, R. R. 1975. Feed efficiency in mice selected for preweaning and postweaning growth. J. Anim. Sci. 41: 1002–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzhugh, H. A. Jr 1976. Analysis of growth curves and strategies for altering their shape. J. Anim. Sci. 42: 1036–1051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forbes, J. M. 1982. Effects of lighting pattern on growth, lactation and food intake of sheep, cattle and deer. Livest. Prod. Sci. 9: 361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, J. G. 1964. Effect of time of year on the roughage intake of housed sheep. Nature, Lond. 240: 798–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. 1932. Growth and the Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Jennrich, R. I. 1977. Stepwise descriminant analysis. In Statistical Methods for Digital Computors (ed. Enslein, K., Ralston, A. and Wilf, H. S.), pp. 76–95. Wiley-Intersciencc, New York.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. C. and Bakker, H. 1979. The effects of selection for different combinations of weights at two ages on the growth curve of mice. Theor. appl. Genet. 55: 57–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merritt, E. S. 1974. Selection for growth rate in broilers with a minimum increase in adult size. Proc. 1st Wld Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Vol. 1, pp. 951–958.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1976. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Tech. Bull. 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Nie, H. N. and Hull, C. H. 1981. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Update 7–9. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Parks, J. R. 1970. Growth curves and the physiology of growth. 1. Animals. Am. J. Physiol. 219: 833–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, J. R. 1982. A Theory of Feeding and Growth of Animals. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattie, W. A. 1965a. Selection for weaning weight in Merino sheep. 1. Direct response to selection. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 5: 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattie, W. A. 1965b. Selection for weaning weight in Merino sheep. 2. Correlated responses in other production characters. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 5: 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattie, W. A. and Williams, A. J. 1966. Growth and efficiency of post-weaning gain in lambs from Merino flocks selected for high and low weaning weight. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 6: 305–309.Google Scholar
Pattie, W. A. and Williams, A. J. 1967. Selection for weaning weight in Merino sheep. 3. Maintenance requirements and the efficiency of conversion of feed to wool in mature ewes. Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 7: 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricard, F. H. 1975. [Selection for the shape of the growth curve in the fowl. Experimental design and first general results.] Annls Gen. Sel. Anim. 7: 427–443.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. C. 1979. Side effects of selection for growth in laboratory animals. Livest. Prod. Sci. 6: 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schanbacher, B. D., Hahn, G. L. and Nienaber, J. A. 1982. Effects of contrasting photoperiods and temperatures on performance traits of confinement- reared ewe lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 55: 620–626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spillman, W. J. and Lang, E. 1924. The Law of Diminishing Increment. World, Yonkers.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. 1968. Genetic variation in growth and development of cattle. In Growth and Development of Mammals (ed. Lodge, G. A. and Lamming, G. E.), pp. 267–290. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. 1980. Genetic size-scaling rules in animal growth. Anim. Prod. 30: 161–165.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. M. and Parks, J. R. 1983. Food intake, growth and mature size in Australian Merino and Dorset Horn sheep. Anim. Prod. 36: 471–479.Google Scholar
Timon, V. M. and Eisen, E. J. 1970. Comparisons of ad libitum and restricted feeding of mice selected and unselected for post-weaning gain. 1. Growth, feed consumption and feed efficiency. Genetics, Princeton 64: 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, K. H., Thompson, J. M., Bayreld, R. F. and Perry, D. 1984. Anorexia and progressive weight loss in long-term feeding experiments with sheep. Aust. vet. J. 61: 193–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weston, R. H. 1968. Factors limiting the intake of feed by sheep. III. The mean retention time of feed particles in sections of the alimentary tract. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19: 261–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, S. P. 1973. Selection for a ratio of body weight gains in mice. J. Anim. Sci. 37: 1098–1103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed