Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:55:54.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fleece characteristics and postnatal fleece development in Finnish Landrace × Merino sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. L. Ryder
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
D. T. Wilson
Affiliation:
ARC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
Get access

Summary

1. Fleece characteristics in Finnish Landrace × Merino and Merino × Finnish Landrace sheep were compared with those of the parental breeds, and although most characters in the crossbreds showed no significant departure from the parental mean, they had similarities to the Merino which imparted commercial value.

2. The wool was mostly of 60s quality compared with 58s in the Finnish Landrace, and 64s and over in the Merino parents. Crimp number showed heterosis, being 5 to 6 per cm in the crossbreds compared with 2 in the Finnish sheep and 7 in the Merino.

3. The mean fleece weight was 3-5 kg, compared with 2-2 kg in the Finnish sheep and 4-2 kg in the Merino.

4. The mean staple length was 13 cm compared with a very variable length around a mean of 16 cm in the Finnish Landrace, and 10 cm in the Merino.

5. The fibre diameter was nearer to that of the Merino, but not significantly so (primary mean 29·2 μ, secondary mean 26·6 μ).

6. The greater fleece weight of the crossbreds would be expected to be associated with a greater skin follicle density, but they had a secondary/primary follicle ratio of about 10 (compared with 5 in the Finnish Landrace and 20 in the Merino), which did not differ significantly from the parental mean.

7. There was some evidence that fibre development was initially more rapid in the crossbred lambs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carter, H. B. 1943. Studies in the biology of the skin of the fleece. 1. The development and general histology of the follicle group in the skin of the Merino. Bull. Court, sclent. ind. Res., Melb., No. 164.Google Scholar
Dry, F. W. 1955. Multifactorial inheritance of halo-hair abundance in New Zealand Romney sheep. Aust.J. agric. Res. 6: 608623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuirk, B. J. 1970. Hybrid vigour in sheep production. M.Sc. Thesis, Univ. of New South Wales.Google Scholar
Nay, T. and Williams, P. 1969. Some wool follicle and crimp parameters in fine-wool Tasmanian Merinos. Aust. J. agric. Res. 20: 169184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryder, M. L. 1969. Development, structure and seasonal change in the coat of Wiltshire sheep. Anim. Prod. 11: 467477.Google Scholar
Ryder, M. L. 1970. Post-natal fleece development in some primitive sheep and crosses. Z. Tierziicht.ZuchtBiol. 86: 371391.Google Scholar
Ryder, M. L. 1971. Cycles of wool follicle activity in some Shetland sheep. Anim. Prod. 13: 511520.Google Scholar
Ryder, M. L. and Stephenson, S. K. 1968. Wool Growth. Academic Press, London and New York.Google Scholar