Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-01T16:34:34.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fat partitioning and tissue distribution in crossbred ewes following different growth paths

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

B. W. Butler-Hogg  and
I. D. Johnsson
B. W. Butler-Hogg
Affiliation:
AFRC, Meat Research Institute, Animal Physiology Division, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
I. D. Johnsson
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
Get access

Abstract

Forty Hampshire Down × Mule (Blue-faced Leicester cf × Swaledale 2) ewe lambs, obtained within a week of birth, were reared on milk replacer and from 6 weeks of age on a complete pelleted diet. Food intake of individual lambs was controlled to produce periods of high (H: ca. 210 g/day) and low (L: ca. 110 g/day) rates of live-weight gain from 4 to 20 and 20 to 36 weeks of age. Groups of eight lambs were slaughtered and dissected at 20 weeks having followed either growth paths H or L, and at 36 weeks having followed growth paths LL, HL or LH.

Growth path had little effect on the lean or bone content of the carcass, but had a significant effect on carcass fat content and distribution. At the same carcass weight, the ratio of intermuscular to subcutaneous fat was higher in leaner carcasses. When compared at the same weight (ca. 35 kg) but different ages (H, 20 weeks; LL 36 weeks), the slower growing LL lambs contained 1·22 kg more fat than the H lambs, primarily in the intermuscular and subcutaneous depots but also in the internal omental depot. At the same age and weight (ca. 36 weeks and 48 kg), lambs which had followed the growth path LH contained 2·5 kg more fat than lambs which had followed the HL path. These differences in fatness are thought to have come about through changes in the effective protein:energy ratio of the diet, induced by the manipulation of food intake.

Carcasses of HL lambs would be of more value to the meat trade compared with LH, since they would require less fat trimming before retail sale.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , February 1986 , pp. 65 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Black, J. L. 1974. Manipulation of body composition through nutrition. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 10: 211–218.Google Scholar
Brown, A. J. and Williams, D. R. 1981. Beef carcass evaluation — measurement of composition using anatomical dissection. Memo. Meat Res. Inst. No. 47.Google Scholar
Burton, J. H. and Reid, J. T. 1969. Interrelationships among energy input, body size, age and body composition of sheep. J. Nutr. 97: 517–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler-Hogg, B. W. 1984. The growth of Clun and Southdown sheep: body composition and the partitioning of total body fat. Anim. Prod. 39: 405–411.Google Scholar
Graham, N. McC., Black, J. L., Faichney, G. J. and Arnold, G. W. 1976. Simulation of growth and production in sheep—model 1: a computer program o t estimate energy and nitrogen utilisation, body composition and empty liveweight change, day by day, for sheep of any age. Elements of model. Agric. Systems 1: 117–125.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. 1932. Growth and the Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. 2nd ed. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Johnsson, I. D. and Hart, I. C. 1985. Pre-pubertal mammogenesis in the sheep. 1. The effects of level of nutrition on growth and mammary development in female lambs. Anim. Prod. 41: 323–332.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J. and Cuthbertson, A. 1977. A survey of the carcass characteristics of the main types of British lamb. Anim. Prod. 25: 165–179.Google Scholar
Margan, D. E., Faichney, G. J., Graham, N. McC. and Donnelly, J. B. 1982. Digestion of a ground and pelleted diet in the stomach and intestines of young sheep from two breeds. Aust. J. agric. Res. 33: 617–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morand-Fehr, P. and Bas, P. 1983. Croissance et metabolisme du tissu adipeux chez le chevreau. Proc. 34th Meet. Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. A. and Owen, J. B. 1972. The nutrition of artificially reared lambs. 1. The effect of different feeding methods applied at three stages of growth. Anim. Prod. 15: 285–292.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. A. and Owen, J. B. 1973. The nutrition of artificially reared lambs. 3. The effect of sex on the performance and carcass composition of lambs subjected to different nutritional treatments. Anim. Prod. 16: 49–57.Google Scholar
Murray, D. M. and Slezacek, Olga 1976. Growth rate and its effect on empty body weight, carcass weight and dissected carcass composition of sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 87: 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donovan, W. M. 1974. Developmental changes in the bodies of Dorper sheep. 4. Effects of rate of live body-mass gain and energy concentration of diet on body composition of weaned Dorper lambs. Rhodesian J. agric. Res. 12: 113–125.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., McDonald, I., Fraser, C. and Corse, Elizabeth L. 1971. The nutrition of the early weaned lamb. III. The effect of ad libitum intake of diets varying in protein concentration on performance and on body composition at different live weights. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 77: 351–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., McDonald, I., Grubb, D. A. and Pennie, K. 1976. The nutrition of the early weaned lamb. IV. Effects on growth rate, food utilization and body composition of changing from a low to a high protein diet. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 86: 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., MacLeod, N. A., Fahmy, S. T. M., Istasse, L. and Hovell, F. D. DeB. 1983. Investigation of nitrogen balance in dairy cows and steers nourished by intragastric infusion. Effects of submaintenance energy input with or without protein. Br. J. Nutr. 50: 99–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palsson, H. and Verges, J. B. 1952. Effects of the plane of nutrition on growth and the development of carcass quality in lambs. Part II. Effects on lambs of 30 1b carcass weight. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 42: 93–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, T. W., Graham, N. McC. and Donnelly, J. B. 1982. The effect of plane of nutrition on the body composition of two breeds of weaner sheep fed a high protein diet. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 98: 241–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, T. W., Graham, N. McC. and O'callaghan, M. 1972. Growth in sheep. 1. The chemical composition of the body. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 79: 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sully, R. J. and Morgan, J. H. L. 1982. The influence of feeding level and type of feed on the carcasses of steers. Aust. J. agric. Res. 33: 721–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulloh, N. M. 1963. The carcase compositions of sheep, cattle and pigs as functions of body weight. In Carcase Composition and Appraisal of Meat Animals (ed. Tribe, D. E.), pp. 5.1–5.16. CSIRO, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Winter, W. H. 1971. A study of weight loss and compensatory gain in sheep. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Melbourne.Google Scholar