Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:45:18.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of molassed sugar-beet pulp nuts supplemented with urea as an energy and protein source for lactating ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. J. Ducker
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Glasgow University Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow
J. Fraser
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Glasgow University Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow
R. G. Hemingway
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Glasgow University Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow
Get access

Summary

A molassed sugar-beet product with added urea and dicalcium phosphate was evaluated as an energy and protein source for housed lactating ewes. Comparisons were made with a barley-vegetable protein and a barley-urea concentrate each formulated to supply approximately the same amount of crude protein. The overall performance of ewes and lambs given barley and vegetable protein was very significantly superior to that of ewes receiving the sugar-beet product. At 6 weeks after lambing the ewes given barley and vegetable protein had lost 57% (with singles) and 23% (with twins) less weight and their lambs had grown 28% (singles) and 48% (twins) more quickly than for ewes receiving the sugar-beet product. The intermediate performance of the ewes receiving barley and urea illustrated that the difference between the barley-vegetable protein concentrate and the sugar-beet product was both an energy and a protein effect.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2. Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E. 1972. A comparative study of the feeding value of dried sugar-beet pulp for milk production. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 78: 371377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemingway, R. G., Parkins, J. J., Ritchie, N. S., Fishwick, G. and Fraser, J. 1976. Urea-containing molassed sugar beet pulp products as major components of barley-based diets for growing Friesian steers. Expl Husb. (In press).Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1973. Feeding the Ewe. Tech. Rep. No. 2. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley, Bucks.Google Scholar
Parkins, J. J., Fishwick, G., Ritchie, N. S., Hemingway, R. G. and Henderson, R. 1975. Urea and phosphate supplemented molassed sugar-beet pulp nuts used as a major component of milk production concentrates for dairy cows. J. Dairy Res. 42: 363369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkins, J. J., Fraser, J., Ritchie, N. S. and Hemingway, R. G. 1974. Urea as a protein source for ewes with twin lambs in late pregnancy and early lactation. Anim. Prod. 19: 321329.Google Scholar
Parkins, J. J., Hemingway, R. G. and Ritchie, N. S. 1974. Molassed sugar-beet pulp nuts supplemented with urea and phosphate used as a milk production concentrate for dairy cows. J. Dairy Res. 41: 289297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronning, M. and Bath, D. L. 1962. Relative milk production value of barley, dried beet pulp, molasses dried beet pulp, and concentrated Steffen filtrate dried beet pulp. J. Dairy Sci. 45: 854857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van es, A. J. H., Nijkamp, H.-J. and Vogt, J. E. 1971. The net energy content of dried sugar-beet pulp and of sucrose when fed to lactating cows. Neth. J. agric. Sci. 19: 4856.Google Scholar
Werner, W., Rey, H. G. and Wielinger, H. 1970. [Properties of a new chromogen for the determination of glucose in blood by the GOD-POD method.] Z. analyt. Chem. 252: 224228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar