Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:56:14.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of intrauterine insemination of sheep with frozen semen: effects of time of insemination and semen dose on conception rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. C. F. Findlater ,
W. Haresign ,
R. M. Curnock  and
N. F. G. Beck
R. C. F. Findlater
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD
W. Haresign
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD
R. M. Curnock
Affiliation:
MLC Pig Breeding Centre, Field Lane, Thorpe Willoughby, Selby YO8 9NL
N. F. G. Beck
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth SY23 3DD
Get access

Abstract

The field application of a laparoscopic technique to permit intra-uterine insemination of ewes with frozen-thawed semen was examined in two trials, conducted over successive years, to (i) determine the optimum time of insemination relative to sponge removal/pregnant mares's serum gonadotropin (PMSG) injection and (ii) establish the relationship between semen dose and conception rate. Pooled semen was used in both trials, and each involved > 900 ewes in a number of commercial flocks.

Maximum conception rates were achieved when insemination was conducted between 54 h and 60 h after sponge removal/ PMSG injection. However, there was no significant difference in conception rate when motile sperm numbers were reduced from 52·2 × 106to 13·0 × 106 motile sperm per uterine horn.

The overall conception rates (pooled over flocks and treatment groups) were 56% and 58% for the two trials, with a wide degree of variation between flocks in both cases (45% to 79% for trial 1 and 45% to 69% for trial 2). However, there was evidence for consistent differences in conception rates between the six flocks involved in both years of the trials.

Keywords

conception rateinseminationsheep
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , August 1991 , pp. 89 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Colas, G. 1979. Fertility in the ewe after artificial insemination with fresh and frozen semen at the induced oestrus, and influence of the photoperiod on the semen quality of the ram. Livestock Production Science 6: 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colas, G. and Guerin, Y. 1981. A new method for thawing ram semen. Theriogenology 6: 623–631.Google Scholar
Corteel, J. M. and Paquignon, M. 1984. Preservation of the male gamete (ram, buck, boar). Proceedings 10th international congress on animal reproduction and artificial insemination, vol. II, pp. 20–27.Google Scholar
Cumming, I. A., Buckmaster, J. M., Blockey, M. A. deB., Goding, J. R., Winfield, G. C. and Baxter, R. W. 1973. Constancy of the interval between luteinizing hormone release and ovulation in the ewe. Biology of Reproduction 9: 24–29.Google Scholar
Curnock, R. M., Reed, H. C. B., Logue, D. N. and Maxwell, W. M. C. 1984. Artificial insemination of ewes with ram semen frozen by the pellet method. Animal Production 38: 546 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Dzuik, P. J. 1965. Double mating of rabbits to determine capacitation time. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 10: 389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dziuk, P. J., Lewis, J. M., Graham, E. F. and Moyer, R. H. 1972. Comparison between natural service and artificial insemination with fresh or frozen sperm at an appointed time in the ewe. journal of Animal Science 35: 572–575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eppleston, J. and Roberts, E. M. 1986. The effects of progestagen, PSMG and time of insemination on fertility in ewes following intra-uterine insemination with frozen semen. Australian Veterinary Journal 63: 124–125.Google Scholar
Findlater, R. C. F. 1989. Intrauterine insemination to improve fertility with frozen semen in sheep. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Fiser, P. S., Ainsworth, L. and Fairfull, R. W. 1987. Evaluation of a new diluent and different processing procedures for cryopreservation of ram semen. Theriogenology 28: 599–607.Google Scholar
Haresign, W. 1990. Controlling reproduction in sheep. In New developments in sheep production, British Society of Animal Production occasional publication no. 14, pp. 23–37.Google Scholar
Haresign, W., Read, S. R., Curnock, R. M. and Reed, H. C. B. 1986. A note on the use of laparoscopy for intrauterine insemination of frozen-thawed semen the ewe. Animal Production 43: 553–556.Google Scholar
Killeen, I. D. and Caffery, G. J. 1982. Uterine spermatozoa with the aid of a laparoscope. Australian Veterinary journal 59: 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killeen, I. D., Caffery, G. J. and Holt, N. 1982. Fertility of ewes following infra-uterine insemination with the aid of a laparoscope. Proceedings 4th annual conference of the Australian Society of Reproductive Biology, Abstr. 104.Google Scholar
King, M. E., Clark, C. F. S., Fraser, C. and Aitkin, R. 1984. The use of sheep artificial insemination for genetic improvement in commercial lamb production. Animal Production 38: 547 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Langford, G. A., Marcus, G. J., Hackett, A. J., Ainsworth, L., Wolynetz, M. S. and Peters, H. F. 1979. A comparison of fresh and frozen semen in the insemination of confined sheep. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 59: 685–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, R. J. and Salamon, S. 1970. Fertility of ram spermatozoa frozen by the pellet method. I. Transport and viability of spermatozoa within the genital tract of the ewe. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 22: 385–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLeod, B. J., Haresign, W. and Lamming, G. E. 1982. Response of seasonally anoestrous ewes to small-dose multiple injections of Gn-RH with and without progesterone pre-treatment. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 65: 223–230.Google Scholar
Maxwell, W. M. C. 1986a. Artificial insemination of ewes with frozen-thawed semen at a synchronised oestrus. 1. Effect of time of onset of oestrus, ovulation and insemination on fertility. Animal Reproduction Science 10: 301–308.Google Scholar
Maxwell, W. M. C. 1986b. Artificial insemination of ewes with frozen-thawed semen at a synchronised oestrus. 2. Effect of dose of spermatozoa and site of insemination on fertility. Animal Reproduction Science 10: 309–316.Google Scholar
Maxwell, W. M. C., Curnock, R. M., Logue, D. N. and Reed, H. C. B. 1980. Fertility of ewes following artificial insemination with semen frozen in pellets or straws, a preliminary report. Theriogenology 14: 83–89.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1982. Sheep artificial insemination. Veterinary Services technical bulletin, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Salamon, S., Evans, G. and Maxwell, W. M. C. 1985. Fertility of ram semen frozen-stored for 16 years. Proeeedings 16th annual conference Australian Society for Reproductive Biology, Abstr. 62.Google Scholar
Salamon, S. and Lightfoot, R. J. 1967. Fertilisation and embryonic loss in sheep after insemination with deep frozen semen. Nature, London 216: 194–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salamon, S. and Lightfoot, R. J. 1970. Fertility of ram spermatozoa frozen by the pellet method. III. The effects of insemination technique, oxytocin and relaxin on lambing. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 22: 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar