Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:39:02.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimation of carcass leanness in young rams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

N. D. Cameron  and
C. Smith
N. D. Cameron
Affiliation:
AFRC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
C. Smith
Affiliation:
AFRC Animal Breeding Research Organisation, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ
Get access

Abstract

The accuracy of six methods to estimate carcass leanness in young rams was studied in 36 Texel-Oxford rams, measured at 5 months of age. The rams were slaughtered and dissected. Plasma non-esterified fatty acid and very low density lipoprotein concentrations, sampled before, during and after fasting, showed no relationship with carcass leanness. The same was true for food conversion efficiency measured from 6 to 16 weeks of age, and for measurements taken with the Scanogram ultrasonic machine. The Vetscan and Danscanner ultrasonic machines gave repeatable measurements of fat depth (0·41 and 0·46 respectively). The Vetscan was the best predictor of carcass leanness by proportionally reducing the residual mean square by about 0·20, corresponding to a correlation of −0·45 between ultrasonic fat depth and carcass leanness. Inclusion of average daily gain and ultrasonic fat depth in a selection index would allow appreciable improvements in both traits.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , April 1985 , pp. 303 - 308
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alliston, J. C. 1983. Evaluation of carcass quality in the live animal. In Sheep Production (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 75–95. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Bennett, G. L., Rae, A. L., Clarke, J. N. and Kirton, A. H. 1983. Research studies for development of a large lean sheep breed. A. Rep. Agric. Res. Div 1982–83. p. 43. N.Z. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries.Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, A., Harrington, G. and Smith, R. J. 1972. Tissue separation — to assess beef and lamb variation. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. (New Ser.) 1: 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooden, J. M., Beach, A. D. and Purchas, R. W. 1980. Measurement of subcutaneous backfat depth in live animals with an ultrasonic probe. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 23: 161–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, H. D., Whitehead, C. C. and Broadbent, L. A. 1982. The relationship between plasma triglyceride concentrations and body fat content in male and female broilers — a basis for selection? Br. Poult. Sci. 23: 15–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempster, A. J. 1979. Variation in carcass characteristics of commercial British sheep with particular reference to overfatness. Meat Sci. 3: 199–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempster, A. J. 1983. Carcass quality and its measurement in sheep. In Sheep Production (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 59–74. Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Arnall, D., Alliston, J. C. and Barker, J. D. 1982. An evaluation of two ultrasonic machines (Scanogram and Danscanner) for predicting the body composition of live sheep. Anim. Prod. 34: 249–255.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1983. Sheep Yearbook. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Pattie, W. A., Thompson, J. M. and Butterfield, R. M. 1975. An evaluation of the Scanogram as an ultrasonic aid for assessing carcase composition in the live sheep. A report submitted to the Australian Meat Board. (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Shelton, M., Smith, G. C. and Orts, F. 1977. Predicting carcass cutability of Rambouillet rams using live animal traits. J. Anim. Sci. 44: 333–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, B. T., Smith, C., King, J. W. B. and Nicholson, D. 1981. Genetic parameters of growth and carcass composition in crossbred lambs. Anim. Prod. 32: 1–7.Google Scholar