No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Erratum
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2010
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Animal Production, Volume 6, Part 1, p. 53
In Table 5, the identification numbers of twin pairs should read 3, 4, 1, 2 (and not 1, 2, 3, 4)
- Type
- Erratum
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1964
You have
Access