Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:06:13.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Environmental and genetic causes of variation in production traits of Damascus goats. 2. Goat productivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. P. Mavrogenis
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
A. Constantinou
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Nicosia, Cyprus
A. Louca
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Nicosia, Cyprus
Get access

Abstract

Data on 1474 lactation records obtained from 1972 to 1978 were used to study environmental and genetic influences on production characters in the Damascus goat. Year and month of kidding had a significant effect on 90- and 150-day milk production after weaning, lactation length and litter weight at weaning (P < 0·01), but no influence on litter weight at birth. Milk production after weaning was not related to litter weight at birth or at weaning. Age of goat at kidding had a significant quadratic effect on milk production, and litter weight at birth and at weaning. No such effects were found for lactation length.

Estimates of heritability, from paternal half-sib correlations, for 90- and 150-day milk production were similar (0·29 (s.e. 0·14)). The genetic correlation between 90- and 150-day milk yield (0·92 (s.e. 0·03)) was high, indicating that part and whole lactation yields are influenced by the same genes. The phenotypic correlations among milk yield traits and lactation length were also high and positive.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amble, V. N., Khandekar, N. C. and Garg, J. N. 1964. Statistical studies on breeding data of Beetal goats. I.CAR. Res. Ser., No. 38.Google Scholar
Dickerson, G. E. 1959. Techniques and Procedures Animal Science Research. American Society of Animal Science, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
Hadjipanayiotou, M. and Louca, A. 1976. The effects of partial suckling on the lactation performance of Chios sheep and Damascus goats and the growth rate of lambs and kids. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 87: 1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1975. Least-squares analysis of data with unequal subclass numbers. U.S. Dep. Agric, ARS H-4.Google Scholar
Hohenboken, W., Corum, Kathleen and Bogart, R. 1976. Genetic, environmental and interaction effects in sheep. I. Reproduction and lamb production per ewe. J. Anim. Sci. 42: 299306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louca, A., Mavrogenis, A. and Lawlor, M. J. 1974. Effects of plane of nutrition in late pregnancy on lamb birth weight and milk yield in early lactation of Chios and Awassi sheep. Anim. Prod. 19: 341349.Google Scholar
Louda, F. and Doney, J. M. 1976. Persistency of lactation in the Improved Valachian breed of sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 87: 455457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavrogenis, A. P. and Louca, A. 1980. Effects of different husbandry systems on milk production of purebred and crossbred sheep. Anim. Prod. 31: 171176.Google Scholar
Morand-fehr, P. and Sauvant, D. 1978. Nutrition and optimum performance of dairy goats. Livestock Prod. Sci. 5: 203213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. 1959. The sampling variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics 15: 469485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rønningen, K. 1967. A study of genetic parameters for milk characteristics in goats. Meld. Norg. LandbrH0gsk., Vol. 46, No. 2.Google Scholar
Rønningen, K. and Gjedrem, T. 1966. Effect of age and season of kidding on milk yields in goats. Meld. Norg. LandbrHøgsk., Vol. 45, No. 21.Google Scholar
Singh, R. N., Acharya, R. M. and Biswas, D. K. 1970. Evaluation of genetic and non-genetic factors affecting some economic traits in goat. Acta Agric. scand. 20: 1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steine, T. A. 1975. [Factors affecting characters of economic importance in goats.] Meld. Norg. LandbrHøgsk., Vol. 54, No. 2.Google Scholar