Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:05:50.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of xylanase and antibiotic addition on ileal and faecal apparent digestibilities of dietary nutrients and evaluating HCl-insoluble ash as a dietary marker in growing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

Y.-L. Yin
Affiliation:
Changsha Institute of Agricultural Modernisation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hunan, Changsha 410 125, Peoples Republic of China
J.D. McEvoy
Affiliation:
Veterinary Science Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Stony Road, Belfast BT4 3SD, UK
H. Schulze
Affiliation:
Finnfeeds International Ltd, Marlborough SN8 1AA, UK
K.J. McCracken
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science, The Queen’s University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK
Get access

Abstract

The effects of xylanase and antibiotic addition to the diet, and the use of HCl-insoluble ash as a marker, on ileal and faecal apparent digestibilities of nutrients were studied with 12 growing pigs fitted with post-valvular T-caecum cannulae (PVTC). The results showed that the apparent ileal digestibility of non-starch polysaccharide (NSP) was high, (over 0·30). Xylanase, or antibiotics (Avoparcin) or xylanase plus antibiotics supplementation of the wheat middling-based diets did not significantly (P > 0·05) increase the ileal and faecal apparent digestibilities of NSP, neutral-detergent fibre (NDF), dry matter, crude protein, energy or amino acids. There were no significant (P > 0·05) differences between the HCl-insoluble ash and Cr2O3 recoveries at the ileal or at the faecal levels: proportionately, 0·864 and 0·911 for the ileal and faecal recoveries of HCl-insoluble ash, and 0·857 and 0. 915 for the ileal and faecal recoveries of Cr2O3, respectively.

Type
Non-ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, A. 1981. Structure and function of gastrointestinal mucosa. In Physiology of the gastrointestinal tract (ed. Johnson, L.R.), pp. 617639. Raven Press, New York.Google Scholar
Allen, C.M., Bedford, M.R. and McCracken, K.J. 1995. A synergistic response to enzyme and antibiotic supplementation of wheat-based diets for broilers. Proceedings of the 10th European symposium on poultry nutrition, Anatalya, Turkey, pp. 369370.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1984. Official methods of analysis, 14th edition. AOAC, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bakker, G.C. and Jongbloed, A.W. 1994. The effects of housing system on apparent digestibility in pigs, using the classical marker techniques, in relation to dietary composition. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 64: 107115.Google Scholar
Bridge, R., Owen, B.D. and Beames, R.M. 1982. The effectiveness of adding penicillin to a mixture of chlortetracycline and sulpha methazine to improve growth of weanling pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 62: 967969.Google Scholar
Eggum, B.O., Fekadu, M., Wolstrup, J., Sauer, W.C. and Just, A. 1979. The effect of dietary antibiotics on protein and energy metabolism in rats: possible significance of the gut microflora. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 30: 177184.Google Scholar
Englyst, H. and Cummings, J.H. 1984. Simplified method for the measurements of total non-starch polysaccharides by gas-liquid chromatography of constituent sugars as alditol acetates. Analyst 109: 937942.Google Scholar
Fisher Scientific. 1999. Catalogue of fine chemicals. Fisher Scientific.Google Scholar
Fuller, M.F. 1991. Methodologies for the measurement of digestion. In Proceedings of the fifth international symposium on digestive physiology in pigs (ed. Verstegen, M. W. A., Huisman, J. and den Hartog, L.A.), pp. 273288. Pudoc, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Fuller, M.F., Darcy, B., Laplace, J.P., Picard, M., Cadenhead, A., Jung, J., Brown, D. and Franklin, M.F. 1994. The measurement of dietary amino acid digestibility in pigs, rats and chickens: a comparison of methodologies. Animal Feed Science and Technology 48: 305324.Google Scholar
GENSTAT 5 Committee. 1993. GENSTAT 5, release 3 reference manual. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Graham, H., Hesselman, K., Jonsson, E. and Åman, P. 1986. The influence of wheat bran and sugar-beet pulp on the digestibility of dietary components in a cereal-based pig diet. Journal of Nutrition 116: 242251.Google Scholar
Jongbloed, A.W., Bakker, J.G., Goedhart, P.W. and Krol-Kramer, F. 1991. Evaluation of chromic oxide and the HCl-insoluble ash as markers for measuring overall apparent digestibility of some dietary nutrients for pigs. In Proceedings of the fifth international symposium on digestive physiology in pigs (ed. Verstegen, M. W. A., Huisman, J. and Hartog, L.A.), pp. 325329. Pudoc, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Just, A. 1980. Ileal digestibility of protein: applied aspects. In Current concepts of digestion and absorption in pigs (ed. Low, A.G. and Partridge, I.G.), pp. 6675. Technical bulletin 3, NIRD, Reading.Google Scholar
Just, A., Fernandez, J.A. and Jørgensen, H. 1985. The influence of virgniamycin on the ileal and faecal digestibility of nutrients in differently composed diets and the utilization of digestible crude protein and energy. In Proceedings of the third international seminar on digestive physiology in the pig (ed. Just, A., Jorgensen, H. and Fernandez, J.A.), pp. 292295. National Institute of Animal Science, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Just, A., Jørgensen, H. and Fernandez, J.A. 1981. The relation between diet composition and the amount of crude protein (amino acids) disappearing in the hind gut with and without addition of antibiotics to the diet. In Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on amino acids (ed. T. Zebrowska, , Buraczewska, L., Buraczewski, S., Kowalczyk, J. and Pastuszewska, B.), pp. 147151. Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw.Google Scholar
Just, A., Sauer, W.C., Bech-Andersen, H., Frgensen, H. and Eggum, B.O. 1979. The influence of the hind gut microflora on the digestibility of protein and amino acids in growing pigs elucidated by addition of antibiotics to different fractions of barley. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 43: 8391.Google Scholar
Kirchgessner, M. 1975. Physiological effects of Payzone in diets for pigs and calves. Züchtungskunde 47: 3241.Google Scholar
Leeuwen, P. van, Kleef, D.J. van, Kempen, G.I.M. van, Huisman, J. and Verstegen, M.W.A. 1991. The post valve T-caecum cannulation technique in pigs applicated to determine the digestibility of amino acids in maize, groundnut and sunflower meal. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 65: 183193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeuwen, P. van, Veldan, A., Boisen, S., Deuring, K., Derksen, G.B., Verstegen, M.W.A. and Schaafsma, G. 1996. Apparent ileal dry matter and crude protein digestibility of rations fed to pigs and determined with the use of chromic oxide (Cr2O3) and acid-insoluble ash as digestive markers. British Journal of Nutrition 76: 551562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, A.G. 1980. Nutrient absorption in pigs. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31: 1087-1089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, J.F., Aherne, F.X. and Okai, D.B. 1974. Use of HCl-insoluble ash as an index for determining apparent digestibility with pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 54: 107109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCracken, K.J. and Allen, C.M. 1995. Problems in interpretation of laboratory studies on the role of feed enzymes in diets for broilers. In Proceedings of the second European symposium of feed enzymes (ed. Hartingsveldt, W., Hessing, M., Lugt, J.P. van der and Somers, W.A.C.), pp. 5864. Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Millard, P. and Chesson, A. 1984. Modifications to swede (Brassica napus L) anterior to the terminal ileum of pigs: some implications for the analysis of dietary fibre. British Journal of Nutrition 52: 583594.Google Scholar
Mills, P.A., Rotter, R.G. and Marquardt, R.R. 1989. Modification of the glucosamine method for the quantification of fungal contamination. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 69: 11051107.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1986. The analysis of agricultural materials, third edition. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Monaghan, C. 1996. Effects of feed enzymes on ileal and faecal digestibility of selected cereal and protein sources for growing pigs. M.Phil. thesis, The Queen’s University of Belfast. Google Scholar
Moore, J.H. 1957. Diurnal variations in the composition of the faeces of pigs on diets containing chromium oxide. British Journal of Nutrition 11: 273288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moughan, P.J., Smith, W.C., Pearson, G. and James, K.A.C. 1991a. Assessment of apparent ileal lysine digestibility for use in diet formulation for the growing pig. Animal Feed Science and Technology 34: 95109.Google Scholar
Moughan, P.J., Smith, W.C., Schrama, J. and Smits, C. 1991b. Chromic oxide and insoluble ash as faecal markers in digestibility studies with young pigs. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 34: 8588.Google Scholar
Nyman, M. 1985. Fermentation of dietary fibre in the intestinal tract. Ph.D. thesis, University of Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
Pollmann, D.S. 1992. Probiotics in swine diets. In Proceedings of the international round table on animal feed biotechnology (ed. Leger, D.A. and Ho, S.K.), pp. 6575. Centre for Food and Animal Research, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Saha, D.C. and Gilbreath, R.L. 1991. Analytical recovery of chromium from diet and faeces determined by colorimeter and atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 55: 433446.Google Scholar
Vranjes, M.V. and Wenk, C. 1995. Influence of dietary enzyme complex on performance of broilers fed on diets with and without antibiotic supplementation. British Poultry Science 36: 265275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
nsche, J., Borgmann, E., Hennig, U., Kreienbring, K. and Bock, H.-D. 1984. Application of the HCl-insoluble ash as an indicator for the determination of nutrient, including amino acid, digestibility at the end of the small intestine and the whole digestive tract of pigs. Archives of Animal Nutrition 12: 817831.Google Scholar
Yen, J.T., Tess, M.W., Pond, W.G. and Dickerson, G.E. 1983. Digestibility and metabolism of dietary nitrogen and energy in contemporary, genetically lean and obese pigs as estimated by total fecal collection and acid insoluble ash. Journal of Animal Science 56: 426430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, Y.-L., Huang, R.l., Zhong, H.Y., Chen, C.M., Li, T.J. and Pan, Y.F. 1993. Nutritive value of feedstuffs and diets for pigs. I. Chemical composition, apparent ileal and faecal digestibilities. Animal Feed Science and Technology 44: 127.Google Scholar
Yin, Y.L., McEvoy, J.D.G., Schulze, H., Hennig, U., Souffrant, W.B. and McCracken, K.J. 2000a. Apparent digestibility (ileal and overall) of nutrients and endogenous nitrogen losses in growing pigs fed wheat or its by-products without or with xylanase supplementation. Livestock Production Science 62: 119132.Google Scholar
Yin, Y.L., McEvoy, J.D.G., Schulze, H., Hennig, U., Souffrant, W.B. and McCracken, K.J. 2000b. Apparent digestibility (ileal and overall) of nutrients as evaluated with PVTC-cannulated or ileo-rectal anastomised pigs fed diets containing two indigestible markers. Livestock Production Science 62: 133142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zebrowska, T. 1973. Digestion and absorption of nitrogenous compounds in the large intestine of pigs. Rocznik nauk Rolniczych, Series B 95: 6590.Google Scholar