Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:19:45.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of pattern of feed distribution during the reproductive cycle on the performance of sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. A. Lodge
G. A. Lodge
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough
Get access

Summary

Three groups of 10 Large White gilts were allocated on a littermate basis to 3 feeding regimes, for 3 successive pregnancies and lactations, to provide the following daily allowances: (A) 6 lb feed per day in pregnancy and 2 lb plus 1 lb per pig suckled in lactation; (B) the same total as (A) but given as 4 lb per day in regnancy and 6 lb plus 1 lb per pig suckled in lactation; (C) a lower overall allowance distributed during pregnancy as 5 lb during weeks 1, 2, 15 and 16, 3 to 5 lb during weeks 3, 4, 13 and 14 and 2 lb during weeks 5 to 12, and during lactation increasing by 1 lb per day to appetite or a maximum of 26 lb at the 21st day, and then decreasing by 1 lb every alternate day to a minimum of 5 lb. Creep-feed was provided ad libitum from 3 weeks of age until weaning at 8 weeks of age. Differences between groups in litter size and weight at birth were not significant but the combined measure of litter weight was significantly lower in C than in A and B (P<0·05); litter size (P<0·05) and litter weight (P<0·01) but not individual pig weight increased with parity. At 3 and 8 weeks of age there were no significant differences between groups in size or weight of litters or in individual pig weights. Pigs of Group C sows consumed significantly more (P< 0·001) creep feed (7 lb per head) than those of Groups A and B. Sows of Group A gained double the weight of Groups B and C during pregnancy (P<0001) and lost significantly more (P<0·001) during lactation; Groups B and C did not differ significantly in either respect. Efficiencies of feed conversion (EFC) of total food into total weight by sow and litter were poorest in Group A and best in Group C.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , May 1969 , pp. 133 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bowland, J. P. 1967. Energetic efficiency of the sow. J. Anim. Sci. 26: 533–539.Google Scholar
Clawson, A. J., Richards, H. L., Matrone, G. and Barrick, E. R. 1963. The influence of level of total nutrient and protein intake on reproductive performance in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 22: 662–669.Google Scholar
Dean, B. T. and Tribble, L. F. 1961. Reproductive performance of swine fed different planes of energy during gestation. Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Stn., No. 774.Google Scholar
Eyles, D. E. 1959. Feeding and management of pregnant sows on pasture. Anim. Prod. 1: 41–50.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A., Elsley, F. W. H. and MacPherson, R. M. 1966a. The effects of level of feeding of sows during pregnancy. I. Reproductive performance. Anim. Prod. 8: 29–38.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A., Elsley, F. H. W. and MacPherson, R. M. 1966b. The effects of level of feeding of sows duri ng pregnancy. II. Changes in body weight. Anim. Prod. 8: 499–506.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A., McDonald, I. and MacPherson, R. M. 1961. Weight changes in sows during pregnancy and lactation. Anim. Prod. 3: 269–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Grady, J. F. 1967. Effect of level and pattern of feeding during pregnancy on weight change and reproductive performance of sows. Ir. J. agric. Res. 6: 57–71.Google Scholar
Parker, J. W. and Clawson, A. J. 1967. Influence of level of total feed intake on digestibility, rate of passage and energetic efficiency of reproduction in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 26: 485–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmon-Legagneur, E. 1965. Quelques aspects des relations nutritionnelles entre la gestation et la lactation chez la truie. Annls Zootech. 14: 1–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon-Legagneur, E. and Jacquot, R. 1961. Quelques aspects des relations nutritionnelles entre la gestation et la lactation chez la truie. C. R. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 253: 1618–1620.Google Scholar
Salmon-Legagneur, E. and Rerat, A. 1962. Nutrition of the sow during pregnancy. In Nutrition of pigs and poultry, p. 207–223. (ed. Morgan, J. T. and Lewis, D.), Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Smith, D. M. 1960a. The effect of condition at farrowing upon the subsequent milk yield and the efficiency of production. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 3: 598–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. M. 1960b. The yield and energy content of milk and the energetic efficiency of sows on different levels of nutrition during gestation and lactation. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 3: 745–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar