Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:19:42.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of pasture grazing or storage feeding and concentrate input between 5·5 and 11 months of age on the performance and carcass composition of bulls and on subsequent growth and carcass composition at 620 kg live weight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. W. J. Steen  and
D. J. Kilpatrick
R. W. J. Steen
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland The Queen's University of Belfast, BT7 1NN
D. J. Kilpatrick
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland The Queen's University of Belfast, BT7 1NN
Get access

Abstract

A 3-year experiment has been carried out to compare systems of bull beef production involving pasture grazing and continuous storage feeding and to examine the effects of sward surface height and concentrate input from 5·5 to 11 months of age on grazing behaviour, growth rate and body composition at the end of the treatment period and on subsequent growth rate and carcass composition at commercial slaughter weight. Animals were either set-stocked at pasture to maintain sward surface heights of 6·5 and 10·0 cm or were given grass silage (725 g digestible organic matter per kg dry matter (DM)) supplemented with 0·8, 1·6, 2·4, 3·2 and 4·0 kg cereal-based concentrates (188 g crude protein per kg DM) per head daily. Half of the animals grazed at each sward height were given 1 -6 kg concentrates per head daily while the remainder received no supplement. A total of 255 continental beef breed × Friesian calves which were initially 198 kg live weight were used. From 11 months of age until slaughter at a mean live weight of 620 kg all animals were given grass silage supplemented with 3 kg cereal-based concentrate DM per head daily.

Reducing sward surface height from 10·0 to 6·5 cm increased the proportion of time spent grazing (P < 0·001), reduced the proportion of time involved in other activities and reduced live-weight gain (P < 0·001) from 1·21 to 0·84 kg/day. Offering concentrates at pasture reduced (P < 0·001) the proportion of time spent grazing (the effect being greater with the animals grazing the shorter swards) but did not affect the performance of the animals grazing the taller swards and produced only a modest increase in the live-weight gain (70 g/kg concentrates) of those grazing the shorter swards. At the end of the treatment period, the carcasses of the animals which had been given silage contained proportionally 0·39 more lipid than those of animals which had been at pasture and had the same growth rate. Differences in live weight at 11 months of age due to differences in feeding from 5·5 to 11 months were largely retained until the end of a 7-month period of realimentation while differences in carcass composition at II months were eliminated by slaughter at a constant live weight of 622 kg.

Keywords

bullscarcass compositiongrazingstorage-feeding
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 66 , Issue 1 , February 1998 , pp. 129 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. Recommended procedures for use in the measurement of beefcattle and carcasses. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Allen, D. and Kilkenny, B. 1984. Beef production from dairy-bred calves. In Planned beef production, second edition pp. 131–173. Granada, London.Google Scholar
Andersen, H. R. and Ingvartsen, K. L. 1984. The influence of energy level, weight at slaughter and castration on growth and feed efficiency in cattle. Livestock Production Science 11: 559–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, R. D., Young, N. E. and Laws, J. A. 1985. Changes in the body composition of cattle exhibiting compensatory growth and the modifying effects of grazing management. Animal Production 41: 309–321.Google Scholar
Barthram, G. T. 1986. Experimental techniques: the HFRO sward stick. Biennial report, Hill Farming Research Organisation 1984·1985, pp. 29–30.Google Scholar
Beattie, V. E. 1994. The effects of environmental enrichment on the domestic pig. Ph.D. thesis, The Queens University of Belfast.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E. and Baker, R. D. 1986. Improving the utilization of forage for lean beef production. Animal and Grassland Research Institute, annual report 1985–86, pp. 102–105.Google Scholar
Berge, P. 1991. Long-term effects of feeding during calfhood on subsequent performance in beef cattle (a review). Livestock Production Science 28: 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berge, P., Geay, Y. and Micol, D. 1991. Effects of feeds and growth rate during the growing phase on subsequent performance during the fattening period and carcass composition in young, dairy breed bulls. Livestock Production Science 28: 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidner, T. D., Schupp, A. R., Montgomery, R. E. and Carpenter, J. C. 1981. Acceptability of beef finished on all-forage, forage-plus-grain or high energy diets. Journal of Animal Science 53: 1181–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bligh, E. G. and Dyer, W. J. 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology 37: 911–917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Commission of the European Communities. 1993. The agricultural situation in the community, 1992 report, pp. 9–16Google Scholar
Conway, A. 1968. Grazing management in relation to beef production. V. Effects of feeding supplements to beef cattle on pasture at two intensities of stocking. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 7: 105–120.Google Scholar
Cuthbertson, A., Harrington, G. and Smith, R. J. 1972. Tissue separation — to assess beef and lamb variation. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production (ed. , Bichard), pp. 113–122. Longman, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Drennan, M. J., Conway, A. and O'Donovan, R. 1982. Compensatory growth in cattle. 3. Effect of stocking rate at pasture in summer on animal performance at pasture and during the subsequent winter period. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 21: 1–11.Google Scholar
Gibb, M. J. and Baker, R. D. 1991. Compensatory growth and body composition changes in grazing steers following silage feeding without or with a supplement of fish meal and monensin. Animal Production 52: 237–247.Google Scholar
Hardy, R. 1982. Finishing young bulls on grass silage fed throughout the year indoors. In Efficient grassland farming. (ed. Corrall, A. J.), occasional symposium no. 14, British Grassland Society, pp. 325–326.Google Scholar
Hedrick, H. B., Paterson, J. A., Matches, A. G., Thomas, J. D., Morrow, R. E., Stringer, W. C. and Lipsey, R. J. 1983. Carcass and palatability characteristics of beef produced on pasture, corn silage and corn grain. Journal ofAnimal Science 57: 791–801.Google Scholar
Keane, M. G. and Drennan, M. J. 1980. Effects of diet type and feeding level on performance, carcass composition and efficiency of Friesian steers serially slaughtered. Irish Journal ofAgricultural Research 19: 53–66.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cook, G. L. and Smith, R. J. 1980. The evaluation of a standardised commercial cutting technique for determining breed differences in carcass composition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95: 431–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A. and Harrington, G. 1982. Beef carcase grading and classification. In Carcase evaluation in livestock breeding, production and marketing, pp. 163Granada, St Albans.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, C. R. 1976. The effect of season of harvest on the utilization by growing beef cattle of dried grass given alone or as a supplement to silage. Ph.D. thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Hinks, C. E., Swift, G., Peebles, K. and Hunter, E. A. 1988. Grass height for finishing cattle. In Efficient beef production from grass (ed. Frame, J.), symposium no. 22, British Grassland Society, pp. 232–234.Google Scholar
McCarrick, R. B. 1967. The growth and body composition of beef cattle fed conserved fodders. In Fodder conservation (ed. Wilkins, R. J.), proceedings of the 10th international grassland congress, Helsinki, pp. 575–580.Google Scholar
Moran, J. B. and Holmes, W. 1978. The application of compensatory growth in grass/cereal beef production systems in the United Kingdom. World Review of Animal Production 14: 65–73.Google Scholar
Morris, J. B. and Moir, K. W. 1963. Methods of determining the chemical composition of dead animals. In Carcass composition and appraisal of meat animals (ed. Tribe, D. E.), 2.1–2.22. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation.Google Scholar
Musangi, R. S., Holmes, W. and Jones, J. G. W. 1965. Barley supplementation and voluntary feed intake of fattening beef cattle under restricted and unrestricted grazing conditions. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 24: 1–11.Google Scholar
Nix, J. 1992. Farm management pocketbook. Wye College, University of London.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. C., Steen, R. W. J. and Kilpatrick, D. J. 1993. Growth and development in beef cattle. 1. Direct and residual effects of plane of nutrition during early life on components of gain and food efficiency in beef cattle. Journal ofAgricultural Science, Cambridge 124: 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollan, N. D. 1995. Partitioning of nutrients for growth in ruminants fed on forages. Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, technical review no. 2, March 1995.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. 1989. A comparison of soya-bean, sunflower and fish meals as protein supplements for yearling cattle offered grass silage-based diets. Animal Production 48: 81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. 1992. The effects of energy intake and forage 2: concentrate ratio in the diet on performance, carcass composition and efficiency of lean meat production in beef cattle. Proceedings of the British Grassland Society third conference, Antrim, September 1992, pp. 143–144.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. 1994. A comparison of pasture grazing and storage feeding, and the effects of sward surface height and concentrate supplementation from 5 to 10 months of age on the lifetime performance and carcass composition of bulls. Animal Production 58: 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. 1995. The effect of plane of nutrition and slaughter weight on growth and food efficiency in bulls, steers and heifers of three breed crosses. Livestock Production Science. 42: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. and Kilpatrick, D. J. 1995. Effects of plane of nutrition and slaughter weight on the carcass composition of serially slaughtered bulls, steers and heifers of three breed crosses. Livestock Production Science 43: 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, J. M. and Prescott, J. H. D. 1970. Beef production from grass and silage with autumn-born calves. 2. The effects on the performance of cattle fed on silage of barley supplementation and of previous grazing intensity. Animal Production 12: 443–450.Google Scholar