Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:45:01.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effects of oestradiol treatment on activity, growth and survival in neonatal piglets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. E. Hughes
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
G. P. Pearce
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
S. S. Baguio
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to elucidate the effects of intra-muscular injection of oestradiol within 1 min of birth (experiment 1) or within 4h of birth (experiment 2) on piglet activity, growth and pre-weaning survival rate. In experiment 1, 248 piglets (25 litters) were alternately injected within litter at birth with either 1 ml peanut oil/saline solution or 0·1 mg oestradiol benzoate in this carrier solution. The subsequent behaviour, growth and survival of these piglets were recorded. Experiment 2 used 38 litters (385 piglets), these being treated by litter with either of the same two treatments as soon after birth as they were found (approx. range 0 to 4 h). Piglet survival data were collected from this field trial. Oestradiol treatment significantly reduced the intervals from birth to reaching the udder (596 v. 740 s, P < 0·05) and from birth to first sucking (1060 v. 1497 s, P < 0·01) relative to control piglets in experiment 1. Treatment had no significant effect on pre-weaning growth rate (experiment 1), but did tend to reduce early postnatal mortality rate in both experiment 1 (7·2 v. 2·4% for control and oestradiol-treated piglets respectively) and experiment 2 (13·0 v. 10·2% for control and oestradiol-treated piglets respectively). It is concluded that oestradiol treatment at, or soon after, birth induces short-term hyperactivity in piglets. This may subsequently be reflected in an improvement in pre-weaning survival rate of piglets, although further data are required to confirm this conclusion.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, D. M. and Stabenfeldt, G. H. 1975. Endocrine changes in the pig during late pregnancy, parturition and lactation. Biology of Reproduction 12: 508515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barber, R. S., Braude, R. and Mitchell, K. G. 1955. Studies on milk production of Large White Pigs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 46: 97118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bate, L. A. and Hacker, R. R. 1982a. Estrogens and piglet viability. II. Effect of estrogen on piglet viability. Journal of Animal Science 54: 10171022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bate, L. A. and Hacker, R. R. 1982b. Estrogens and piglet viability 1. Serum estogen concentrations in piglets. Journal of Animal Science 54: 10121016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Btinger, B. 1985. [Ethological method for assessing the vitality of newborn piglets]. Monatschefte fur Veterinarmedizin 40: 519524 (Pig News and Information, 7:127abstr.).Google Scholar
Choong, C. H. 1972. Estrogen metabolism in the fetus and placenta of the sow. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, M. C., Meschia, G. and Barren, D. H. 1966. Role of progesterone in inhibition of muscle tone and respiratory rhythm in foetal lambs. Nature, London 212: 842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, G. M. 1989. A symposium-neonatal mortality in the pig. In Manipulating pig production II (ed. Barnett, J. L. and Hennessy, D. P.). APSA, Werribee, Australia.Google Scholar
England, D. C. 1986. Improving sow efficiency by management to enhance opportunity for nutritional intake by neonatal piglets. Journal of Animal Science 63: 12971306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
English, P. R. and Morrison, V. 1984. Causes and prevention of piglet mortality. Pig News and Information 5: 369376.Google Scholar
English, P. R. and Smith, W. J. 1975. Some causes of death i n neonatal pigs. Veterinary Annual 15: 95104.Google Scholar
English, P. R., Smith, W. and MacLean, A. 1982. The sow; improving her efficiency. 2nd ed. Farming Press, Ipswich.Google Scholar
Fahmy, M. H., Holtmann, W. B., Maclntyre, T. M. and Moxley, J. E. 1978. Evaluation of piglet mortality in 28 two-breed crosses among eight breeds of pig. Animal Production 26: 277285.Google Scholar
Farmer, C., Houtz, S. K. and Hagen, D. R. 1987a. Estrone concentration in sow milk during and after parturition. Journal of Animal Science 64: 10861089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farmer, C., Kensinger, R. S. and Hagen, D. R. 1987b. Relationship of estrone and prolactin with growth and survival of piglets to 35D of age. Journal of Animal Science 65: 10341041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D. 1978. Observation on the behavioral development of suckling and early-weaned piglets during the first six weeks after birth. Animal Behaviour 26: 2230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gravas, L. 1979. Behavioural and physical effects of flooring on piglets and sows. Applied Animal Ethology 5: 333345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundloch, H. 1968. Brutifurzorge, brutpflege, verhaltensontogenese und tagesperiodik beim europdischen wildschewein. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 25: 955995.Google Scholar
Hacker, R. R., Hazeleger, W., Van Poppel, F. J. J., Osinga, A., Verstegen, M. W. A. and Van de Wiel, D. F. M. 1979. Urinary oestrone concentration in relation to piglet viability, growth and mortality. Livestock Production 6: 313318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartsock, T. G., Graves, H. B. and Baumgardt, B. R. 1977. Agonistic behavior and the nursing order in suckling piglets: relationships with survival, growth and body composition. Journal of Animal Science 44: 320330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, P. E. and Varley, M. A. 1980. Reproduction in the pig. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Kuipers, M. and Whatson, T. S. 1979. Sleep in piglets: an observational study. Applied Animal Ethology 5: 145151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, N. J. and Hurnik, J. F. 1985. The development of nursing behavior in swine. Applied Animal Behaviour 14: 225232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, D. J., Mackay, J. M. K. and Williams, J. T. 1972. Effects of oestrogen on activity and survival of lambs delivered by hysterectomy. Research in Veterinary Science 13: 399401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molokwu, E. C. I. and Wagner, W. C. 1973. Endocrine physiology of the puerperal sow. Journal of Animal Science 36: 11581163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheel, D. E., Graves, H. B. and Sherritt, G. W. 1977. Nursing order, social dominance and growth in swine. Journal of Animal Science 45: 219229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schouten, W. G. P. 1986. Rearing conditions and behaviour in pigs. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wageningen.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. 1981. Biometry. 2nd ed. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
Stanton, H. C. and Carroll, J. K. 1974. Potential mechanisms responsible for prenatal and perinatal mortality or low viability of swine. Journal of Animal Science 38: 10371044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed