Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T20:19:34.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of nutrition in pregnancy and in lactation on milk yield in ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. T. Treacher
T. T. Treacher
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Berkshire, SL6 SLR
Get access

Summary

1. Dorset Horn ewes were fed individually to make high (H) and low (L) gains in weight in the last 6 weeks of pregnancy. The gains were 20% (H) and 10% (L) of the live weight in week 14 of pregnancy for ewes with twin foetuses, and 16% (H) and 6% (L) for ewes with a single foetus. Three levels of intake imposed during lactation were denned as low (L) 15·0, medium (M) 22·5, and high (H) 30·0 g of feed dry matter/kg of ewe live weight in week 14 of pregnancy. The lambs were removed 12 to 16 hours after parturition and the ewes were machine-milked twice daily for the first 6 weeks of lactation.

2. Ewes making low gains in pregnancy produced lambs with slightly lower birth weights but the difference was not significant for either twins or singles. Pregnancy treatment had no effect on milk yield or live-weight change in lactation, but fat content was increased in milk from ewes on the H treatment in pregnancy (8·06% v. 7·46%).

3. Level of feeding during lactation did not significantly affect milk yields. The total yields in the first 6 weeks of lactation were (L) 49·4 kg, (M) 60·8 kg and (H) 62·7 kg. However, there were significant effects on milk composition. The treatment means for fat content were (L) 8·34%, (M) 8·05% and (H) 6·84% and for solids-not-fat content were (L) 10·04%, (M) 10·37% and (H) 10·82%.

4. Live-weight losses in lactation were (L) 9·1 kg, (M) 6·3 kg and (H) 3·2 kg.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , August 1971 , pp. 493 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock.No. 2, Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Ashton, W. M., Owen, J. B. and Ingleton, J. W. 1964. A study of the composition of Clun Forest ewe's milk. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 63: 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association Of Official Agricultural Chemists. 1960. Official Methods of Analysis, 10th ed., pp. 222–224. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Barnicoat, C. R., Logan, A. G. and Grant, A. I. 1949. Milk secretion studies with New Zealand Romney ewes. 2. Milk yields of ewes and the factors influencing them. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 39: 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnicoat, C. R., Murray, P. F., Roberts, E. M. and Wilson, G. S. 1957. Milk secretion studies with New Zealand Romney ewes. 6. Yield and composition of ewe's milk in relation to growth of the lamb. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 48: 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Standards Institute. 1955. Gerber method for the determination of fat in milk and milk products. Br. Stand. Instn Rep. No. 696, part 2, p. 7.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Ridler, B. and Foot, A. S. 1958. Levels of feeding of concentrates for dairy heifers before and after calving. J. Dairy Res. 25: 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flatt, W. P., Moore, L. A., Hoover, N. W. and Plowman, R. D. 1965. Energy metabolism studies with a high producing lactating dairy cow. J. Dairy Sci. 48: 797–798.Google Scholar
Foot, A. S., Line, C. and Rowland, S. J. 1963. The effect of pre-partum feeding of heifers on milk composition. J. Dairy Res. 30: 403–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. W. and Hogue, D. E. 1963. Studies on the TDN requirements of pregnant and lactating ewes. J. Anim. Sci. 22: 410–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Large, R. V., Alder, F. E. and Spedding, C. R. W, 1959. Winter feeding of the in-lamb ewe. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 53: 102–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrin, D. R. 1958. The chemical composition of the colostrum and milk of the ewe. J. Dairy Res. 25: 70–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. 1961. Variations in the chemical composition of the milk of the cow. Dairy Sci. Abstr. 23: 251–258 and 303-308.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18: 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treacher, T. T. 1967. Effects of nutrition on milk production in the ewe. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Reading.Google Scholar
Treacher, T. T. 1970a. Effects of nutrition in late pregnancy on subsequent milk production in ewes. Anim. Prod. 12: 23–36.Google Scholar
Treacher, T. T. 1970b. Apparatus and milking techniques used in lactation studies in sheep. J. Dairy Res. 37: 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar