Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T18:26:09.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of level of feeding of sows during pregnancy. II. Changes in body weight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. A. Lodge ,
W. H. Elsley  and
R. M. MacPherson
G. A. Lodge
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
W. H. Elsley
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
R. M. MacPherson
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen
Get access

Extract

1. Twelve groups of 3 litter-sister Large White gilts were given during three successive pregnancies a daily meal allowance of either 6 lb. (Group A) 3 lb. (Group B) or 3 lb. for 76 days followed by 6 lb. until parturition (Group C). During 8-week lactation periods all received the same daily allowance of 4 lb. meal plus 0·8 lb. for each piglet suckled.

2. Net weight gains during the three successive pregnancies respectively were: Group A, 114, 97 and 79 lb.; Group B, 11, 10 and 7 lb.; Group C, 47, 44 and 35 lb. The differences between groups were highly significant (P<0·001) and there was a significant parity interaction (P<0·05) in that Group A sows showed a significant decline in net weight gain from parity to parity whereas those of Groups B and C did not. No relationship was found between net weight gain and litter weight at birth.

3. Weight changes during the three successive lactation periods respectively were: Group A, –37, –41 and –36 lb.; Group B, 2, 14 and 4 lb.; Group C, –10, –14 and –5 lb. The differences between groups were significant to various degrees in different lactations. There was no relationship between weight changes during lactation and total litter weight at 3 weeks of age.

4. Overall weight changes from first service to third weaning were: Group A, 160 lb.; Group B, 72 lb.; Group C, 71 lb. The differences between Group A and Groups B and C were highly significant (P<0·001).

5. The implication of the results as an indication of feed requirements for reproduction is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , October 1966 , pp. 499 - 506
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brody, S., Proctor, R. C., & Ashworth, U. S., 1934. Growth and development. XXXIV. Basal metabolism, endogenous nitrogen, creatinine and neutral sulphur excretions as functions of body weight. Res. Bull. Missouri agric. Exp. Sta. no. 220.Google Scholar
Clawson, A. J., Richards, H. L., Matrone, G., & Barrick, E. R., 1963. The influence of level of total nutrient and protein intake on reproductive performance of swine. J. Anim. Sci., 22: 662–669.Google Scholar
Crowther, C., 1938. Nutrition and reproduction. J. Minist. Agric. Fish., 45: 797–805.Google Scholar
Dean, B. T., & Tribble, L. F., 1961. Reproductive performance of swine fed different planes of energy during gestation. Res. Bul. Missouri agrie. Exp. Sta. no. 774.Google Scholar
Heap, F. C., & Lodge, G. A., 1965. Unpublished data; University of Nottingham School of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Lenkeit, W., Gütte, J. O., Kirchoff, W., Soehngen, F. K., & Farriés, E., 1956. Langfristigen Untersuchungen zum ausseren und inneren Stoffweschel des graviden und laktierenden Schweines. 4. Weitre Untersuchungen zur Abhangigkeit des N-Umsatzes wahrend der Laktation von der Nahrstoffversorgung wahrend der Graviditat. Z. Tierernähr. Futtermittelk., 11: 337–352.Google Scholar
Lenkeit, W., Molnar, S., Lanztsch, H. J., & Gütte, J. P., 1962. Untersuchungen uber den Beginn der Mobilisierung der eingelagerten Korperreserven von Ca, P und N im Graviditats-Laktations-Zyklus bei Sauen. Z. Tierphysiol. Tierernähr. Futtermittelk. 17: 65–90.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A., Elsley, F. W. H., & MacPherson, R. M., 1966. The effects of level of feeding of sows during pregnancy. I. Reproductive performance. Anim. Prod., 8: 29–38.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A., & Lucas, I. A. M., 1959. Breeding and rearing pigs. In Scientific Principles of Feeding Farm Livestock. Farmer and Stockbreeder Publn., London, pp. 125–167.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A., McDonald, I., & MacPherson, R. M., 1961. Weight changes in sows during pregnancy and lactation. Anim. Prod., 3: 269–275.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. H., & Kelley, N. A. R., 1938. Energy requirements of swine and estimates of heat production and gaseous exchange of use in planning the ventilation of hog houses. J. agric. Res., 56: 811–829.Google Scholar
Moustgaard, J., 1962. Foetal development. In Nutrition of Pigs and Poultry (Proc. Univ. Nottingham 8th Easter School), Butterworths, London, pp. 189–206.Google Scholar
Rerat, A. M., 1963. Efficiency of Animal Production. Pigs. Proc. World Conference on Animal Production, Rome, 2: 89–110.Google Scholar
Salmon-Legagneur, E., 1962. Effet chronologique d'une modification du niveau alimentaire chez la truie gestante. Ann. Zootech., 11: 173–180.Google Scholar
Salmon-Legagneur, E., & Jacquot, R., 1961a. Influence du niveau alimentaire sur le compórtement nutritionnel de la truie gestante. C.R. Acad. Sci., 253: 253–1497.Google Scholar
Salmon-Legagneur, E., & Jacquot, R., 1961b. Quelques aspects des relations nutritionelles entre la gestation et la lactation chez la truie. C.R. Acad Sci., 253: 1618–1620.Google Scholar
Vanschoubroek, F., 1963. Studien en Onderzoekingen over de Voeding van Varkens. Laboratorium voor Zootechnie, Rijksuniversitiet, Gent, Belgium.Google Scholar