Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:31:37.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of injected and surface-spread slurry on the intake and grazing behaviour of dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

B. F. Pain  and
D. M. Broom
B. F. Pain
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
D. M. Broom
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 2AJ
Get access

Abstract

Direct injection of slurry into soil was tested as a means of avoiding the rejection of herbage by dairy cattle when slurry is spread on the surface. British Friesian dairy cows grazed paddocks that had been injected with slurry at 25 t/ha ( = 60 kg N/ha) 9 weeks previously, had slurry spread on the surface at the same rate and time, or received 60 kg N/ha as ammonium nitrate. There was less herbage dry matter available per cow on paddocks with slurry than on the control. The cattle on the surface slurry treatment consumed approximately 30% less herbage dry matter than those on the other two treatments.

Cattle on pasture with surface-spread slurry spent longer grazing, walked about more during grazing, appeared to take smaller bites of grass, engaged in competitive interactions more frequently and drank more often. Behaviour was less affected on injected paddocks. In a second experiment, paddocks which either received inorganic fertilizer throughout the season, or were injected at 25 t/ha in June and August instead of the fertilizer application, were grazed by the herd at intervals during the season. Injecting slurry had no effect on herbage intake or animal behaviour.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , February 1978 , pp. 75 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Broom, D. M., Pain, B. F. and Leaver, J. D. 1975. The effects of slurry on the acceptability of swards to grazing cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 85: 331–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, M. E. 1976. A simple disc instrument for estimating herbage yield. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 31: 37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, D. P. 1977. The influence of animal manures on the grazing behaviour and herbage intake of cattle. Proc. EEC Seminar Land Spreading of Manures, Modena, 1976. pp. 143–152.Google Scholar
Marten, G. C. and Donker, J. D. 1966. Animal excrement as a factor influencing acceptability of grazed forage. Proc. 10th int. Grassld Congress, Helsinki, pp. 359–61.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1976. Profitable utilisation of livestock manures. Short Term Leaflet No. 171. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Pinner, Middlesex.Google Scholar
Pain, B. F., Leaver, J. D. and Broom, D. M. 1974. Effects of cow slurry on herbage production, intake by cattle and grazing behaviour. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 29: 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankin, J. D. and Taylor, R. J. 1969. A study of some disease hazards which could be associated with the system of applying cattle slurry to pasture. Vet. Rec. 85: 578–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid, G. W., Greenhalgh, J. F. D. and Aitken, J. N. 1972. The effects of grazing intensity on herbage consumption and animal production. IV. An evaluation of two methods for avoiding the rejection of fouled herbage by dairy cows. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 78: 491–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S. 1956. Non-parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar