Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T19:25:59.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of ewe live weight and body condition score around mating on production from four sheep breeds in extensive grazing systems in Uruguay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. E. Gonzalez ,
D. Labuonora  and
A. J. E. Russel
R. E. Gonzalez
Affiliation:
Agronomic University of Uruguay, Aconcagua 5011 Ap 303, CP 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay
D. Labuonora
Affiliation:
Agronomic University of Uruguay, Aconcagua 5011 Ap 303, CP 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay
A. J. E. Russel
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH
Get access

Abstract

Ewe live iveights were recorded 4 weeks prior to mating, at the beginning of mating and 22 to 23 days later over a period of 3 years in a flock of some 300 breeding ewes comprising approximately equal numbers of Australian Merino, Ideal (Polwarth), Merilin and Corriedale breeds in a pastorally based grazing system in Uruguay. Multiple-bearing ewes were generally heavier than single-bearing ewes which in turn were heavier than ewes which did not conceive, these differences being greatest in 3- and 4-year-old ewes (i.e. in their second and third breeding seasons). Body condition scores of non-pregnant ewes were lower than those of pregnant ewes, particularly in the 3-and 4-year-old age groups. Ewe live weights achieved prior to, during and at the end of the mating period and the body condition score achieved 4 weeks prior to mating all had significant influences on the number of lambs born (P < 0·01) but there were no significant effects of changes in either live weight or body condition over the 4 weeks prior to mating or during the mating period. The effect of body condition score over the range from 2·0 to 4·0 was to increase the proportions of single- and multiple-bearing ewes and to decrease the proportion of non-pregnant ewes such that the number of lambs born per ewe mated increased from 0·94 to 1·38. Fleece weights differed significantly between breeds, Corriedales having the heaviest fleeces and Merilins the lightest (4·26 and 3·22 kg respectively). Wool production was also significantly and positively affected by age (P < 0·01) and by ewe weight at mating (P < 0·01). The results demonstrate the importance of giving preferential nutritional treatment to younger ewes to ensure a satisfactory subsequent lambing performance and improved wool production.

Keywords

body conditionextensive husbandrylamb productionlive weightsheep breed
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 64 , Issue 1 , February 1997 , pp. 139 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adalsteinsson, S. 1979. The independent effects of liveweight and body condition on fecundity and productivity of Icelandic ewes. Animal Production 28:13–23.Google Scholar
Coop, I. E. 1966. Effect of flushing on reproductive performance of ewes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 67: 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doney, J. M., Gunn, R. G. and Horak, F. 1982. Reproduction. In Sheep and goat production (ed. Coop, I. E.), pp. 57–78. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Ducker, M. J. and Boyd, J. S. 1977. The effect of body size and body condition on the ovulation rate of ewes. Animal Production 24: 377–385.Google Scholar
Guerra, J. C., Thwaites, C. J. and Edey, T. N. 1972. The effects of components of body weight on reproductive efficiency in the Merino ewe. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78: 245–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, R. G. 1983. The influence of nutrition on the reproductive performance of ewes. In Sheep production (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 99–110. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. G. and Doney, J. M. 1975. The interaction of nutrition and body condition at mating on ovulation rate and early embryo mortality in Scottish Blackface ewes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85: 465–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, R. G. and Doney, J. M. 1979. Fertility in Cheviot ewes. 1. The effect of body condition at mating on ovulation and early embryo mortality in North and South Country Cheviot ewes. Animal Production 29:11–16.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. G., Doney, J. M. and Russel, A. J. F. 1969. Fertility in Scottish Blackface ewes as influenced by nutrition and body condition at mating. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 73: 289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, F. H. W., White, D. H., Kenney, P. A. and Davis, I. F. 1978. Predicting ovulation rate from liveweight in ewes. Agricultural Systems 3: 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. J. 1983. Nutrition of the pregnant ewe. In Sheep production (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 111–131. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F. 1983. Meeting the feed requirements of the hill ewe. In Sheep production (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 219–238. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Doney, J. M. and Gunn, R. G. 1969. Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72: 451–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treacher, T. T. 1983. Nutrient requirements for lactation in the ewe. In Sheep production (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 133–153. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar