Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:39:31.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of dietary fibre, source of fat and dietary energy concentration on the voluntary food intake and performance of growing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. G. Campbell  and
M. R. Taverner
R. G. Campbell
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Werribee, Victoria, 3030, Australia
M. R. Taverner
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Werribee, Victoria, 3030, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Ninety entire male pigs were used in two experiments to investigate the effects of energy concentration on the performance of growing pigs given diets containing relatively high or low levels of fibre. A blended fat product was also compared with tallow as a source of dietary energy for pigs in the first experiment.

In experiment 1, 60 pigs growing between 20 and 45 kg live weight were given 10 diets containing approximately 120 g acid-detergent fibre per kg (80 g crude fibre per kg), and 10, 30, 50, 75 or 100 g/kg of either tallow or the blended fat product.

Although the source of fat had no significant effect on food intake or growth performance, voluntary energy intake and growth rate increased with increase in the level of fat added to the diet and with concomitant increase in dietary digestible energy (DE) concentration up to 50 g/kg and 13·2 MJ/kg respectively. Further increase in the level of fat added to the diet and in DE concentration resulted in a decline in voluntary food intake, whilst energy intake and growth rate remained relatively constant at 27 MJ/day and 720 g/day respectively.

In experiment 2, 30 pigs were used to investigate the animals' response to five levels of dietary DE concentration (11·8 to 15·1 MJ DE per kg) between 20 and 50 kg live weight. The highest level of acid-detergent fibre in the diets was 62 g/kg (50 g crude fibre per kg) and this declined with increase in energy concentration to 30 g/kg (25 g crude fibre per kg) in the diet of highest energy concentration.

Voluntary food intake was not significantly affected by dietary energy concentration, and voluntary energy intake and growth rate increased linearly with increase in dietary energy concentration up to 14·5 MJ DE per kg. Maximum energy intake (31 MJ DE per day) and growth rate (905 g/day) in experiment 2 was proportionately 0·15 and 0·26 higher than that achieved by pigs given the higher fibre diets in experiment 1.

The results for voluntary food intake and growth rate suggested that the pig's demand for energy and consequently its response to dietary energy concentration was affected by dietary fibre concentration.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , October 1986 , pp. 327 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Campbell, R. G. 1978. Effects of partial replacement of wheat by oats and tallow, or tallow residue in the diets of growing pigs. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 18: 218–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. G., Tavlrner, M. R. and Curic, D. M. 1983. The influence of feeding level from 20 to 45 kg live weight on the performance and body composition of female and entire male pigs. Animal Production 36: 193–199.Google Scholar
Cole, D. J. A., Duckworth, J. E. and Holmes, W. 1967. Factors affecting voluntary feed intake in pigs. 1. The effect of digestible energy content of the diet on the intake of castrated male pigs housed in holding pens and in metabolism crates. Animal Production 9: 141–148.Google Scholar
Davies, J. L. and Lucas, I. A. M. 1972. Responses to variations in dietary energy intakes by growing pigs. 3. Effect of level of intake of diets of differing protein and fat content on the performance of growing pigs. Animal Production 15: 127–137.Google Scholar
Fuller, M. F., Cadenhead, A. and Pennie, K. 1984. Effects of omitting lysine from diets conforming to Agricultural Research Council (1981) standards for pigs. Animal Production 39: 449–453.Google Scholar
Keys, J. E., Van Soest, P. J. and Young, E. P. 1970. Effect of increasing dietary cell wall content on the digestibility of hemicellulose and cellulose in swine and rats. Journal of Animal Science 31: 1172–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, J. B. and Ridgman, W. J. 1967. The effect of dietary energy content on the voluntary intake of pigs. Animal Production 9: 107–113.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B. and Ridgman, W. J. 1968. Further studies of the effect of dietary energy content on the voluntary intake of pigs. Animal Production 10: 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savidge, J. A., Cole, D. J. A. and Lewis, D. 1984. A study of dietary energy density and genotype interaction on voluntary food intake of the grower pig. Animal Production 38: 535 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Troelsen, J. E. and Bell, J. M. 1963. A comparison of nutritional effects in swine and mice. Responses in feed intake, feed efficiency and carcass characteristics to similar diets. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 43: 294–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar